Lauda Not Anymore in DT now | How does DT work?

[LoyceV]

might be a better idea to prioritize those that are now neutral from lauda's removal from dt.

Agreed! But I can't scrape that

[1714899020]

1714899020

[1714899020]

1714899020

[1714899020]

1714899020

[1714899020]

1714899020

[S_Therapist]

Wondering how you noticed this so quickly, possibly an alt account that's no longer painted red?

Yesterday, I saw red paint in mmm01's profile while today it is not, simple.

If you're curious, you can click the 'hierarchical view' link at the bottom of the page, and you will be able to see exactly which users have decided to include or exclude certain users from their trust lists.

Nicely explained. Thank you mate.

Hey, Happy Birthday to You.

I'll compile a list of accounts tagged by Lauda.

Is it possible to list accounts who were only painted by Lauda?
Sorry, I am quite late.

[Quickseller]

As per, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full, Lauda is...

Included by: Blazed & hilariousandco

Excluded by: HostFat, OgNasty & Tomatocage
 
Someone must have excluded him recently. Who is he?

SaltySpitoon previously had Lauda in his trust list due to the dubious claim that since many new users included Lauda in their trust list, and that many experienced users excluded Lauda, that new users collectively want lauda on DT. This logic did not make sense.

[Cashi]

Well, if it's not possible to sort out this problem and add Lauda again to DT2, there will be lot of work for remaining DT members to tag the now untagged cheaters. 

I'm sure they won't stay long untagged, so if they join a bounty now they will get kicked very soon if they receive red trust again. But after all these DT changes show, how important it is to have abuser's accounts tagged at least by two DT members.

[Quickseller]

Well, if it's not possible to sort out this problem and add Lauda again to DT2, there will be lot of work for remaining DT members to tag the now untagged cheaters. 

You spelled ‘scammer’ wrong.

[S_Therapist]

Well, if it's not possible to sort out this problem and add Lauda again to DT2.

There is nothing to sort out. If any DT1 member includes Lauda in his trust list, it will sort out automatically.

there will be lot of work for remaining DT members to tag the now untagged cheaters.  

Trying to list all the users who turned into neutral from red.
Learn More- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5045629

[LoyceV]

Trying to list all the users who turned into neutral from red.
Learn More- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5045629

You beat me to it: Keeping an eye on users with red trust from Lauda

[S_Therapist]

Trying to list all the users who turned into neutral from red.
Learn More- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5045629

You beat me to it: Keeping an eye on users with red trust from Lauda

Not exactly, there has some difference between the two lists. You are listing all the people who have been tagged by Lauda while I am listing people who have been turned into neutral from red.
Also, I have listed 100 only till now.

[LoyceV]

You are listing all the people who have been tagged by Lauda while I am listing people who have been turned into neutral from red.

I've sent a PM to Vod, asking to update those profiles on BPIP so I can scrape their current trust. With that, I could exclude all current red (and banned!) accounts too.

[OgNasty]

You are listing all the people who have been tagged by Lauda while I am listing people who have been turned into neutral from red.

I've sent a PM to Vod, asking to update those profiles on BPIP so I can scrape their current trust. With that, I could exclude all current red (and banned!) accounts too.

Thank you both for your efforts in filling this gap quickly to protect forum users.

[S_Therapist]

You are listing all the people who have been tagged by Lauda while I am listing people who have been turned into neutral from red.

I've sent a PM to Vod, asking to update those profiles on BPIP so I can scrape their current trust. With that, I could exclude all current red (and banned!) accounts too.

It will be quite easy for you, also less time-consuming. I do have to do it manually which consumes huge time. So, can I stop working on it? As, it is easier for you.

Removed from DT1 it doesn't mean all feedback has removed. All feedback will reflect on Untrusted feedback. If someone visit profiles and check untrusted feedback than obviously he will see that tag. If anybody never check all feedback before make any trade than it will not much benefits to make list. If peoples are very lazy than he deserve scam.  

I doubt 10% people know that there is a trust system without DT, lol. Also, those trust isn't seen in profile by default if you don't change your setting.

[The Cryptovator]

Removed from DT1 it doesn't mean all feedback has removed. All feedback will reflect on Untrusted feedback. If someone visit profiles and check untrusted feedback than obviously he will see that tag. If anybody never check all feedback before make any trade than it will not much benefits to make list. If peoples are very lazy than he deserve scam.

It would be better option if others DT tag them those have tagged by Lauda. But I think its not possible as well. On the other hand, as far as I know Lauda removed DT1 multiple time and someone put back again. I think same thing will happen again. So there is nothing celebrate for scammers.

[LoyceV]

It will be quite easy for you, also less time-consuming. I do have to do it manually which consumes huge time. So, can I stop working on it? As, it is easier for you.

Up to you
If you still want to check who's red or not, I'd say start from my list once it's ready (~2000 profiles takes ~40 minutes to scrape), the ones who are offline for a very long time aren't really relevant at the moment.

[Quickseller]

It would be better option if others DT tag them those have tagged by Lauda. But I think its not possible as well. On the other hand, as far as I know Lauda removed DT1 multiple time and someone put back again. I think same thing will happen again. So there is nothing celebrate for scammers.

It would probably be an even better option to verify that anyone someone is considering leaving negative trust that they are in fact a scammer (or someone who will likely scam in the future). They shouldn’t leave a negative rating just because lauda says the are a scammer without evidence.

[S_Therapist]

It would probably be an even better option to verify that anyone someone is considering leaving negative trust that they are in fact a scammer

I don't think DT member tagged someone without any issue although there might be some exceptions.

(or someone who will likely scam in the future).

A proverb going that Black will take no other hue.

They shouldn’t leave a negative rating just because lauda says the are a scammer without evidence.

Most of those have enough reference link. Without reference link, tagging again will look awkward. In this case, DT can check the ref link and tag.