Satoshi Nakamoto's P2P foundation profile makes a reply

[Its About Sharing]

I think you should probably review some of his professional writing before you decide that is the case.

Anyone can correct an email if given time. Satoshi's correspondences with Gavin and the team, were the ones Satoshi just "wrote" (more spontaneously) and those emails
that Dorian "just wrote", seem on another lower level.

[1715136220]

1715136220

[1715136220]

1715136220

[1715136220]

1715136220

[1715136220]

1715136220

[1715136220]

1715136220

[cuddaloreappu]

if you really want to know who satoshi is...visit this sub-reddit.

http://www.reddit.com/r/satoshistories

[AliceWonder]

I'm not saying I am Satoshi Nakamoto, but think about it... have you ever seen me and Satoshi on this forum at the same time ?

[giveBTCpls]

I was actually half convinced the guy with a confused face (the old guy they followed into the entrance of his house) was the actual real deal acting confused, but I guess I was wrong and the mistery must go on.

[CrackedLogic]

http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto

"I am not Dorian Nakamoto."





I saw this posted by /u/l0gz on reddit  a few minutes before posting it here

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1zrshb/real_satoshi_nakamoto_denies_being_dorian_nakamoto/

Huh??? 
I cannot compute

[AliceWonder]

I was actually half convinced the guy with a confused face (the old guy they followed into the entrance of his house) was the actual real deal acting confused, but I guess I was wrong and the mistery must go on.

Satoshi has been too good with opsec to make the kind of blatant mistake that would be required for that old guy to be Satoshi.

[BitCoinDream]

There are some great comments on this conversation...

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1zrshb/real_satoshi_nakamoto_denies_being_dorian_nakamoto/

Newsweek should have waited at least three confirmations before publishing their story.

They couldn't. They were trying to exploit "headline malleability."

We have two negatives: Dorian Nakamoto denies he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto denies he is Dorian Nakamoto.

[PalmerLaura]

We have two negatives: Dorian Nakamoto denies he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi Nakamoto denies he is Dorian Nakamoto.

[cryptmebro]

Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

[oblivi]

Well I actually took the time to read some of this and it seems they have a lot more evidence than last time. If it is really Dr Craig it would suck. It was cooler when the man was an unknown myth.

[theymos_away]

Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

Wright brought this upon himself. I don't expect anything from Satoshi about this.

[cryptmebro]

Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

Wright brought this upon himself. I don't expect anything from Satoshi about this.

Good point.

[target]

I knew it! craig just want to get credits. tip my hat to satoshi for being anonymous! its not weird to have pricacy

[Quickseller]

Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

Too bad that Wright is deliberately trying to make it look like as if he is satoshi. For example in the YouTube video when he is asked who he is and what his involvement in Bitcoin is, Wright could have easily come up with a better answer if he wanted to hide the fact that he is satoshi (assuming he is in fact satoshi, which I doubt). He obviously knew well in advance that he would be speaking, and he could have just as easily said something to make it look like he is not satoshi (if that is what he wanted, against probably not the case).

[Kakmakr]

Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

Too bad that Wright is deliberately trying to make it look like as if he is satoshi. For example in the YouTube video when he is asked who he is and what his involvement in Bitcoin is, Wright could have easily come up with a better answer if he wanted to hide the fact that he is satoshi (assuming he is in fact satoshi, which I doubt). He obviously knew well in advance that he would be speaking, and he could have just as easily said something to make it look like he is not satoshi (if that is what he wanted, against probably not the case).

His response rather indicate to me, someone who is undecided on the matter. He wants to say something, but something is holding him back. It could be one huge elaborate hoax or it could be the real deal. He is obviously VERY intelligent and very private, and he ticks most of the <Wright> boxes. Excuse the pun. ^hmf^

I think, we might just have the real deal here. 

[Quickseller]

Inb4 Satoshi says "I am not Dr. Craig Steven Wright."

Too bad that Wright is deliberately trying to make it look like as if he is satoshi. For example in the YouTube video when he is asked who he is and what his involvement in Bitcoin is, Wright could have easily come up with a better answer if he wanted to hide the fact that he is satoshi (assuming he is in fact satoshi, which I doubt). He obviously knew well in advance that he would be speaking, and he could have just as easily said something to make it look like he is not satoshi (if that is what he wanted, against probably not the case).

His response rather indicate to me, someone who is undecided on the matter. He wants to say something, but something is holding him back. It could be one huge elaborate hoax or it could be the real deal. He is obviously VERY intelligent and very private, and he ticks most of the <Wright> boxes. Excuse the pun. ^hmf^

I think, we might just have the real deal here. 

I think the chances of this guy being satoshi are fairly small. However regardless of if Wright is in fact satoshi, Wright wants the world to believe that he is satoshi

[cryptmebro]

If the real Satoshi wanted to go public, he would have no trouble providing solid proof. He also would have no reason to make passive aggressive comments and innuendo. This whole thing reaks of a sham.

[hiddensphinx]

If the real Satoshi wanted to go public, he would have no trouble providing solid proof. He also would have no reason to make passive aggressive comments and innuendo. This whole thing reaks of a sham.

Maybe David Kleiman has the private keys to the 1 million Bitcoin and died with it?