Bitcoin Forum
April 18, 2024, 09:21:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: StakXMR Cryptonight v8 performance  (Read 386 times)
Ursul0 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 857
Merit: 262


View Profile
October 18, 2018, 03:26:37 PM
Last edit: October 18, 2018, 04:42:59 PM by Ursul0
 #1

Hey guys, how's your v8 performance?

On Polarises (both 8GB and 4GB) I see a drop in hashrate of roughly 10%

However Vegas is a diffident story, it seems to be somewhat inconsistent.
My optimal v7 threads intensities were 2024 and 1968 and while it seems to be working fine on a single Vega56(18.6.1 driver), producing about 20% lower hash, just above 1600...
It gives me trouble on a rig of mixed ones (FE, 64, 56) it will still run on those high intensities, but the GPUs would produce around 1000h/s
And after I lower it all to about 1800&1200 some of the GPUs(one 56 and one 64) would not go above 1000h/s, while the rest would hash  at around 1300.

Any ideas?

Just built 2.5.1, yet it seems to make no difference.



If you want to be a moderator, report many posts with accuracy. You will be noticed.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713475271
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713475271

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713475271
Reply with quote  #2

1713475271
Report to moderator
huntingthesnark
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 357
Merit: 26


View Profile WWW
October 18, 2018, 04:01:03 PM
 #2

Hey guys, how's your v8 performance?

On Polarises (both 8GB and 4GB) I see a drop in hashrate of roughly 10%

However Vegas is a diffident story, it seems to be somewhat inconsistent.
My optimal v7 threads intensities were 2024 and 1968 and while it seems to be working fine on a single Vega56(18.6.1 driver), producing about 20% lower hash, just above 1600...
It gives me trouble on a rig of mixed ones (FE, 64, 56) it will still run on those high intensities, but the GPU would produce around 1000h/s
And after I lower it all to about 1800&1200 some of the GPUs(one 56 and one 64) would not go above 1000h/s, while the rest would hash  at around 1300.

Any ideas?

Just built 2.5.1, yet it seems to make no difference.


Not sure if this is a related issue, but I'm getting a similar issue (one 64 and one 56 in a rig will not go above a few hundred h/s). Tried all the usual things, kinda stumped now. Running Cast.

For the latest Crypto news and alts info check out https://coinsjar.info/
Fascinat
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 19, 2018, 10:12:47 AM
 #3

I have the R9 nano, dropped from 710H/s to 540 H/s using the same clock. The V7 uses Claymore and V8 uses XMR Stak.
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 906
Merit: 507


View Profile
October 19, 2018, 10:47:10 AM
 #4

I have the R9 nano, dropped from 710H/s to 540 H/s using the same clock. The V7 uses Claymore and V8 uses XMR Stak.
I could never get my older r9 cards to perform on other miner like they would on claymore he's working on the v8 so hopefully will be out soon
Divinity666
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 312
Merit: 2


View Profile
October 19, 2018, 02:22:04 PM
 #5

xmr-stak won't work on my R9 Furies, but xmrig did, I got 840kH\s@130Wt per card using 1920 intensity(tried 2024, 1984, 1952 but it didn't work).

ps all my furies have 60CU(50% unlock)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!