Is global warming a scam?

[MakeMoneyBtc]

I don't see any reason why global warming could be called a scam. Iean, what would be the point of lying people something bad is about to happen to this planet? Everyone is talking about this all around the world and there are some many studies made on this to prove its actually true and it just doesn't make sense to invent all of this.

[paddyfield]

If anybody thinks that global warming a scam, please just watch weather news around the world and you will get idea what is going on with weather and climate changes.

How many years have you watched the weather forecast?Have you seen the Jurassic weather forecast?Have you seen the weather forecast 5000 years ago?

[paddyfield]

The Jurassic period and the weather conditions of 5,000 years ago were found in geological exploration, when temperatures were higher than they are now.About 400 to 500 years ago, humans entered the ice age,The temperature went down, and you might say that's why carbon emissions are controlled.

[BADecker]

Check the links in the article.


Leftist lunatics dropping the phrase “climate change”… “climate crisis” to be the new phrase to terrorize everyone with a shameless, contrived HOAX

Before there was “global warming,” there was “global cooling.”

A renowned Time magazine article from the mid-1970s claimed that the earth was rapidly cooling and for the same reasons — human-caused technology and activity. What’s more, the next “Ice Age” was just around the corner, and a large portion of the world’s population would starve to death because of dramatically shortened growing seasons. (See a portion of the article at the Free Republic and the actual link to a snippet of the original article on Time’s website here).

Well, that turned out to be false. So the climate hucksters had to come up with something else to scare the bejesus out of all of us so we’d just turn over all authority — and all our money — to the ‘powers that be.’

The world isn’t cooling, the change went, it is warming, and so much so that we’ve only got a few years to live. Or something like that.

But after years of trying and failing to sell the “global warming” hoax, the Left-wing science propagandists came up with a new phrase — “climate change” — because, after all, who could argue the fact that, throughout history, the earth’s climate has…changed?

Now that phrase has also failed to sufficiently convince the bulk of the world’s people to surrender their liberty and their property and their money to the globalists. So it’s time to change it again — to “climate crisis.” Or “environmental collapse.” (Related: NASA declares carbon dioxide is GREENING the Earth… reveals how Green New Deal is a DEATH cult that would collapse global ecology.)

[stegos4privacy]

I don't think it's a scam. Polar ice caps are melting at an alarming rate, lakes are drying up, typhoons are more frequent. We only have one home and that is Earth. We should do our best to protect it at all cost.

[Regat]

https://climate.nasa.gov

Here you can find a lot of facts and researches about global warming and weather with all the References.

Remember: When we are talking about science the first important thing are references and if those studies are recognized by the scientific community.

Doubting about this in 2019 has no excuses anymore, you can use Google, understand how to verify a scientific article and study. The situation is now very complicated and we need to act fast.
I can understand that for normal people decrypting right information out of this enormous amount of information we eat everyday is not easy. Be sure that if there is someone that wants you to continue to doubt about climate change is who's running the oil companies and who's polluting the world right now.

You can start to study to make an opinion about it and stop doubting, that's a general rule and again: Studying is not reading an article on a shady blog or watching a video posted by your aunt about a secret renegade scientist, you need references and opinion from the scientific community, not from idiots who never studied what they're talking about. Always verify what you're reading.

[BADecker]

^^^ If you are going to recognize the scientific community, do it in the same way you would let someone into your house... only after he is bonded.

In other words, make the scientists take the oath or affirmation, get them on the stand, and let them make their statements there. Then, bond them so that if they have damaged anyone by lying, that there is monetary recourse for all who were damaged. And place them under contract for liability for what they said on the stand.

Why? Because there are tons of studies that show global warming is a farce. Certainly there is climate change. Temperatures go up and they go down. Then they go up, again, and down again. That's the standard understanding in science.

[Ucy]

The earth goes through cycle? Or it is dying? Anyone conversant with the Bible especially parts   like the Book of Esdras (apocryphal) won't be surprised at all. Lots of mysteries are revealed in that book.

I think the earth was not created to last even for 20,000yrs. It  ages like people age. Desertification, drying water bodies are all symptoms of the aging.
At this rate of aging, the earth will probably won't be habitable in 1500yrs.   Google: "Earth’s Magnetic Field decay rate" to know why I said this... Earth magnetic field could vanish in 2000yrs. but unfortunately some scientists try to downplay this fact with the term  "Reversal".

[Zythiphill]

If there is a world catastrophe, it can unite many Nations , I think part of the truth is still there , as the winters are not the same as before were in my city

[omonuyak]

Most times I look at this warning we do have about the globe as a scam and it is a well plan propagation to create fear in the mind of the society and to move people's mind from the real thing to falsehood. Remember that we are at the time when a lot of falsehood has been brought into our society and we most be careful of information we allowed into our minds.

[Regat]

^^^ If you are going to recognize the scientific community, do it in the same way you would let someone into your house... only after he is bonded.

In other words, make the scientists take the oath or affirmation, get them on the stand, and let them make their statements there. Then, bond them so that if they have damaged anyone by lying, that there is monetary recourse for all who were damaged. And place them under contract for liability for what they said on the stand.

Why? Because there are tons of studies that show global warming is a farce. Certainly there is climate change. Temperatures go up and they go down. Then they go up, again, and down again. That's the standard understanding in science.

Are you really responding to my comment, after you read it, with:

"..there are TONS of studies that show global warming is a farce" without posting the actual studies and ALL the references that they have?

We can't talk about science without indicate facts (we shouldn't talk about anything without facts), which I did, with the Nasa website (https://climate.nasa.gov), and references (that let you understand where the data are coming from, and if those are real studies). Than, AGAIN, you should verify the study, you can, with all the references, and if those studies are recognized by the scientific community (which are not a secret organization, but scientists that STUDIED all their life to understand a specific phenomenon). Our only way to understand if something could be true is to trust the majority of these people (almost the totality in this case).

We are in a very dark phase in our history. Malicious or simply wrong people are writing studies, published and especially advertised around by people that NEVER studied anything and unfortunately can't understand the system at all. Please, study as much as possible and always verify what you read, don't be the prey of the communication system.

[BADecker]

^^^ Perhaps you are one of those who is a real scientist who has done the studies. If you are, have you considered all the implications of the observations you have made, from every angle? If you aren't, why are you relying on some studies, and not the others? How do you know that some studies are accurate and others aren't?

Get out there and take a look at the cold winters the northern part of the USA has been having for the last couple years. That's just one simple observation that shows that if there is any global warming at all, it's on the decline. But if you say that the Sahara was exceptionally hot the last couple of years, have you really balanced all the reports to see what is happening around the world?

[Regat]

^^^ Perhaps you are one of those who is a real scientist who has done the studies. If you are, have you considered all the implications of the observations you have made, from every angle? If you aren't, why are you relying on some studies, and not the others? How do you know that some studies are accurate and others aren't?

Get out there and take a look at the cold winters the northern part of the USA has been having for the last couple years. That's just one simple observation that shows that if there is any global warming at all, it's on the decline. But if you say that the Sahara was exceptionally hot the last couple of years, have you really balanced all the reports to see what is happening around the world?

I can't understand if you're trolling. I'm just saying that every observation that you make in science must be shared with studies that prove it, all other observations are just meaningless. In science you have to prove your findings. When you say a number, you have to prove the calculation behind that number. You can't just say a number and wait for others to prove that the calculation behind it is wrong, that's completely crazy.

You can tell if a certain study is accurate and others aren't because of whether the majority of the scientific community agrees on it or not, that's how it works. You don't ask people on the street if a study is accurate. LOL

So, again, if you're trolling you're not funny, but if you go out of your house looking at the mountains and try to compare your observations with those of people that studied for their whole lives and are actually proving something with scientific studies, I'm afraid we're talking about bigger problems than not being funny, sorry.

[Johnzky]

Climate change from global warming is indeed and we can evaluate this from our own abilities. The heat is extensive and very different from the past years the rainy season is changing and eventually happening in summer(this is what in our country) but ofcourse in yours has also some difference on what you are having in past

[semobo]

Humans did many inventions for the centuries which can create changes in the world's environment causes global warming as well.It is not a scam but if we can change the current system into more global friendly then all the changes can recover to the original state but will take longer time.

[cryptjh]

I think global warming is real enough, it both man-made but the world is generally moving away from an ice age that lasted 100.000  years and ended around 12.000 years ago.
So even it the humans stopped their pollution the world would continue to warm up.

[pamchik]

lmao ofc it is

[BADecker]

^^^ Perhaps you are one of those who is a real scientist who has done the studies. If you are, have you considered all the implications of the observations you have made, from every angle? If you aren't, why are you relying on some studies, and not the others? How do you know that some studies are accurate and others aren't?

Get out there and take a look at the cold winters the northern part of the USA has been having for the last couple years. That's just one simple observation that shows that if there is any global warming at all, it's on the decline. But if you say that the Sahara was exceptionally hot the last couple of years, have you really balanced all the reports to see what is happening around the world?

I can't understand if you're trolling. I'm just saying that every observation that you make in science must be shared with studies that prove it, all other observations are just meaningless. In science you have to prove your findings. When you say a number, you have to prove the calculation behind that number. You can't just say a number and wait for others to prove that the calculation behind it is wrong, that's completely crazy.

You can tell if a certain study is accurate and others aren't because of whether the majority of the scientific community agrees on it or not, that's how it works. You don't ask people on the street if a study is accurate. LOL

So, again, if you're trolling you're not funny, but if you go out of your house looking at the mountains and try to compare your observations with those of people that studied for their whole lives and are actually proving something with scientific studies, I'm afraid we're talking about bigger problems than not being funny, sorry.

I can't tell if you are just being silly or what? Anybody can print out studies. Anybody can get cohorts to say the studies are real.

Nobody can tell if the studies are real except if he does them himself... or at least participates. But if he is honest, or if his studies matter, let him get on the stand under oath and testify, with penalties and imprisonment if he is lying.

In the case of global warming, there are so many studies that suggest the opposite, that GW isn't known to be factual, and that G-cooling seems more logical.

[abeecrypto]

The more fear the general public has, the more control the world's elite has over them.

Do you think that the global warming/climate change controversy is one of these instances?

I think it is arrogant to think we can affect climate change. The earth goes through various cycles which alter conditions. We do have some affect on what happens, but I the extent of our contribution is likely very limited.

I'm not saying something it's something that we shouldn't worry about. We have to come up with alternate living solutions to minimize deaths and other catastrophes, but I don't think it's all our fault.

Thoughts?

Cycles keeps going naturally when there are no alteration. But when alteration sets in, an imbalance is created. Humans excessive exploitation of the natural resources has created that imbalance.
I don't think climate change/global warming is a scam?

[RobertRay]

I believe it's true and we need to take care of it. However, I suppose, people in the North are happy, coz now the temperature is higher.