I'm accusing you of running a
scam exchange.
Your posted data is all bogus. For example.
https://api.wacdaq.pro/api/server_status This is the data requested from your server to report the number of current users who are online.
But if you open that URL in two tabs at the same time, you'll notice that the numbers are always different. And not even close.
40 people did not suddenly exit your site in the 100 milliseconds that it took for my second tab to load.
...
Well, this is an unfortunate accusation, especially because it pretty much set the stage for the rest of the piled-up negativity in this thread.
"Scam Exchange"? How is anything you posted serves to be an indication of such strong accusation?
From what I know, this exchange is pretty much in a testing mode even today.
Can you point out at one person being scammed? Probably not, but isn't it what is required to "support" an accusation like that?
Do you think that perhaps some testing might be required now and then and that perhaps you simply witnessed such an event?
RE "...40 people ... suddenly exit..." , or could this be an indication of some fine programming of trading algorithms (bots) being worked on to serve platform market makers and users, all built-in?
Anyway, as posted in Kovrita Project's thread (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170932.0;topicseen), project's first of stablecoin series USDk has been listed on Wacdaq.pro.
If anybody is interested to know how such listing is NOT of any risk to Kovrita platform users, feel free to discuss this in the project's thread.
Kindly,
Nathan