Anyone believes in a blockchain governance?

[Red Chieftain]

Hey there. I'm a newbie here, but I think it's the right place to discuss something intriguing me - blockchain for running companies and even the entire countries. You know, DAO and all this stuff (hope the word Ethereum is not a swear word at this forum).

The interest was catalyzed by the already renowned Vlad Zamfir's articles (https://blog.goodaudience.com/blockchain-governance-101-eea5201d7992 this is where it all started from) on the decentralized governance; the message and the wrathful responses to them coming from pretty much everybody.

So, is there anybody thinking that blockchain will inevitably become a part of the big politics and businesses? And, if so, do the communities like that of Aragon, Ethereum or something like this https://dgov.foundation/ really matter, is it possible to actually influence anything through them and so does the active participation there make any sense or not?

[1715073491]

1715073491

[1715073491]

1715073491

[1715073491]

1715073491

[SneakyLady]

Blockchain will definitely become a huge part of how governments and businesses are governed. Everything will likely become collective and decentralized, as our current model is based on deception of the masses and profit for a select few, leading to a variety of problems. There are enough people who are fed up with this and found the beginning of the solution in blockchain technology.

It will succeed because it human nature to its advantage, as people will be financially rewarded for making good decisions instead of making corrupt decisions.

[Red Chieftain]

Blockchain will definitely become a huge part of how governments and businesses are governed. Everything will likely become collective and decentralized, as our current model is based on deception of the masses and profit for a select few, leading to a variety of problems. There are enough people who are fed up with this and found the beginning of the solution in blockchain technology.

It will succeed because it human nature to its advantage, as people will be financially rewarded for making good decisions instead of making corrupt decisions.

I agree. But, realistically, how can Buterin or Zamfir or whoever else change anything without being allowed to so by the authorities in the first place? And if the thing changes everything so radically, making the politicians look dull, corrupted and generally unnecessary, why would they let that happen?