Reporter Statistics

[TheBeardedBaby]

I know someone who has probably more than 50k good reports now, but I won't reveal his name.
A few months ago he had 48k.. and he is not a bot.
Here is the proof (if he didn't photoshoped it)


Hmm the image quality is bad, I don't have time to find out why, here is the link to the image.
https://m.imgur.com/gallery/rQnhcBx

[ChemicalSpillage]

@iansenko

[Welsh]

Probably easier than plagiarism (to some extent)... if you look for overlapping Twitter/Facebook accounts or Bitcoin addresses then I think you cover a wide berth. This can also be automated

Those are the easier cases! It's when you start diving deeper with the individual linguistic fingerprints that we all have. Some are easier than others. Obviously, this isn't really enough to go by on its own, but when combining with other data the user has posted could prove to be useful. I think I've only done this a couple of times in the past, and that was back when I was reporting. I remember years back I looked at the type of language this alt ring was using, their login times, and all sorts. If my memory serves me correct they didn't have any addresses posted publicly. They were then banned. I've yet to do this as a moderator though as it just takes so much time, and without any other data backing it up its a waste of time.

[DaveF]

I have 263 bad reports, and now that the new system out where bad reports are actually shown you'll be able to guess why, and hopefully improve upon that. Honestly, bad reports aren't that big of a deal.

Are you talking about the number of bad reports or is there a place that I can see which reports I made that were considered bad?

The number of bad reports is nice, but the issue is when I went to bed I had 8 unhandled reports. I woke up with 2 unhandled reports and another 2 bad ones added to my count. I have no idea which ones were good, which ones were bad and which ones were not looked at yet.

If there is a link to see which is which please share. If it's someplace obvious feel free to poke fun of me...

Thanks,
Dave

 

[o_e_l_e_o]

If there is a link to see which is which please share.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine

You need to have 300 good reports before it gives you an individual breakdown of your reports, though.

[DaveF]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine

You need to have 300 good reports before it gives you an individual breakdown of your reports, though.

Well that's kind of backwards. You get to guess for your first few hundred reported posts, then we tell you what we think is good and what we think is bad.
I would like to think that after 300 good reports I would have figured it out.

Ah, well off to report some more.

-Dave

[malevolent]

Well that's kind of backwards. You get to guess for your first few hundred reported posts, then we tell you what we think is good and what we think is bad.
I would like to think that after 300 good reports I would have figured it out.

I think the reasoning is that:

a. it's not a problem if someone makes a bad report, as one correct report is worth many bad ones;
b. if every user could see which of their reports are bad/good/unhandled, it could create a bigger burden on mods, Global mods and admins with questions why their report was handled the way it was.

[Lafu]

For sure if a user reports statistic have 10 good reports and 500 bad reports he should think about his reporting skillz maybe ,
but as malevolent says 1 good report is better than 10 bad reports . 

[tbct_mt2]

b. if every user could see which of their reports are bad/good/unhandled, it could create a bigger burden on mods, Global mods and admins with questions why their report was handled the way it was.

I guess it is one of reasons why theymos has not yet create reporter badges and requirements to get those badges. Even if badges do not bring any sort of benefits to reporters (that we all believe badges don't have), it still might result in spamming wave of reports, and more bad reports might be submitted. If any kind of reporter badges launched, I think requirements to get them should be kept in secret, like lucky number of activity to hit Legendary rank.
If someone usually make post reports, just keep doing this, and when a beautiful day comes with lucky number of total good reports, a reporter badge will be rewarded for that account.

[OcTradism]

If that image is not a product of photoshop, you should be awarded a Legendary Reporter Badge. You deserve it because you are one of most powerful fighters against spammers.

[TryNinja]

If that image is not a product of photoshop, you should be awarded a Legendary Reporter Badge. You deserve it because you are one of most powerful fighters against spammers.

"Total time logged in: 13.7 billions years and 5 minutes."

[OcTradism]

If that image is not a product of photoshop, you should be awarded a Legendary Reporter Badge. You deserve it because you are one of most powerful fighters against spammers.

"Total time logged in: 13.7 billions years and 5 minutes."

I did not notice it :V

[DaveF]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine

You need to have 300 good reports before it gives you an individual breakdown of your reports, though.

Well that's kind of backwards. You get to guess for your first few hundred reported posts, then we tell you what we think is good and what we think is bad.
I would like to think that after 300 good reports I would have figured it out.

Ah, well off to report some more.

-Dave

WooHoo up to 200 good reports.
Yeah, it's not much compared to some of you but still I added a lot in the last 30 days.

You have reported 203 posts with 99% accuracy (200 good, 3 bad, 0 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports.

-Dave

[DaveF]

WooHoo finally got over 300.
Yeah I know I'm still a slacker compared to some of you, but I do report the ones I see.
Also, can now see the list of what has been done to the ones I reported.

-Dave

[Lafu]

Here is my update on the reports Statistic !

Code:

Bitcoin Forum > Your reports

You have reported 17601 posts with 100% accuracy (17506 good, 34 bad, 61 unhandled).

[DaveF]

Dave patting himself on the back....I'm up to 400 good reports.
Yeah, I am still an amateur compared to some of you, but I try.
-Dave

[DiamondCardz]

Probably reported about 50 posts in the last few days in my crusade to clean up my favorite forum section Only had 1 of those marked bad so far and to be fair my report was pretty flimsy on that one. My plan is to keep reporting and reporting and reporting until people finally get the message and post threads in their intended sections, but who knows if they ever will

[LoyceV]

I was whitelisted by hilariousandco a few weeks back, hoping that would reduce the delay of 4 seconds between reports: it doesn't!
So once you have enough activity to wait only 4 seconds between posts, there's nothing else that can increase your reporting speed.

My stats:

You have reported 6797 posts with 99% accuracy (6447 good, 79 bad, 271 unhandled).

And on url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1903546]LoyceMobile[/url]:
519 posts, 100%, 495 good, 3 bad, 21 unhandled.

[Lafu]

Because i see some activity here in this thread and i forgot to look for it at some stage here are my reports !
Little late but at least i got a few more in the mean time on it .
Nice to see some new faces in here as well.

Code:

You have reported 17672 posts with 100% accuracy (17576 good, 34 bad, 62 unhandled).

[Welsh]

I was whitelisted by hilariousandco a few weeks back, hoping that would reduce the delay of 4 seconds between reports: it doesn't!
So once you have enough activity to wait only 4 seconds between posts, there's nothing else that can increase your reporting speed.

This might be worth looking at as 4 seconds when reporting certain types of spam can be annoying for the reporter, and deter them from reporting. I know there's tools out there such as Suchmoon's where you can add reports to queues, but having it natively within the forum so there's not such a wait. I think anyone over 5000+ good reports should be only limited to a 1 second cool down. Then, that will likely prevent too many errors/requests, and still not interrupt with reporting.