Announcement @Lauda @ThePharacist @actmyname @Timelord2067 @suchmoon

[bitsnack]

They tagged you as your a account seller, you just contribute spam to the forum, not suprised. 

Deal with it.

[Thule]

They tagged you as your a account seller, you just contribute spam to the forum, not suprised. 

Deal with it.

And you are clearly even to dumb to read

[suchmoon]

People who will get the special treatment from me

suchmoon

Looks like my trust rating on you is spot on. So I'm assuming I'm getting a free massage or something.

[Vod]

i start protecting my good name and business doing the same these faggots did with the only diffrence that i will post real evidence to not fall to their low level

I really doubt anyone who calls others "faggots" has a good name anywhere.  :/

[The Sceptical Chymist]

No i'm going to inform the crypto community about these people.

So in my case, you're going to inform a bunch of people about whatever it is you know about me (which probably isn't much), and those people likely won't give a shit anyway since I'm a complete nobody outside of bitcointalk.  I'm not even that big a deal on bitcointalk to begin with, outside of being on DT.

These threats seem to sound vaguely familiar to me.  The whole "I've got so much dirt on ____ and will release it in X days, so watch out" rings a bell, but I can't seem to remember who it was who last said crap like this.  For some reason, QS comes to mind but I could be mistaken.

I really doubt anyone who calls others "faggots" has a good name anywhere.  :/

I'm sure there are certain circles on the internet where that might not be true, but if he's going to include such epithets in his "expose" on the members he's listed, it's probably not going to reflect well on him.

Anyway, can't wait for the outcome of this.  My curiosity is piqued.

[OgNasty]

I really doubt anyone who calls others "faggots" has a good name anywhere.  :/

I'm sure there are certain circles on the internet where that might not be true, but if he's going to include such epithets in his "expose" on the members he's listed, it's probably not going to reflect well on him.

Indeed.  You can see a whole list of people here who trust those who use such terms to describe others:

[suchmoon]

So in my case, you're going to inform a bunch of people about whatever it is you know about me

You might be off the hook. Instead some "pha racist" dude is gonna get... uhm... treated by the OP, who has trouble with spelling among many other things.


Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

[Lauda]

My rating does not even affect you anymore. Maybe it is time to let this go and get a life?
Protip: Stuff like this usually results in more consequences.

* Lauda is done with this thread. Cheerio.

[Quickseller]

People who will get the special treatment from me

suchmoon

Looks like my trust rating on you is spot on. So I'm assuming I'm getting a free massage or something.

    Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

I am not an expert, but I think you might have forgotten to explain why he is a scammer.

[suchmoon]

I am not an expert

Oh don't sell yourself short, your trust score and your trust history indicates otherwise:


Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

[Thule]

I see Lauda already removed one negativ feedback from me .Good start.


But let's talk also about another topic about the abuse of DT members giving for the same action multiple negativ trust feedback even months later just to push somebody down .....


I got the negativ feedback for buying an account on august 2017.

For the same reference i get another negativ feedback from Lauda and ThePharmacist on January 2018 which means 5 months later.
Of course i didn't get it for buying that account but because i started questioning it to one of Lauda's gang members.

So after being punished for something which is not against forum rules 5 months later i get again negativ feedback from 2 stupid DT members for the same reference i recived 5 months ago.
Isn't this a clear abuse with the intention to discredit someone by giving him high negativ trustfeed ?

How does it come both gave me negativ trust at the same day which was 5 months after i received a negative feedback for the account buy for this action which was 5 months before that ?
Its clearly an attack and abuse of the DT power to discredit someone not important for what.

They gave that bogus feedback not because i bought that account but because i started questioning their actions and their gang is working quickly to push anybody down questioning them.

They just copied the reference link (archive) from the first poster and gave the same reason.
Are we going now to make for each one who has a negativ feedback 10 backup negativ feedbacks or is it to discredit someone to death who has legit claims against their group.

The last of Laudas group gave me even 7 months after buying an account a negativ trust feedback the 6th one for the same reason.
How many negativ feedback is someone getting when doing something "wrong" ?

How does it come other people got only 1 negativ feedback and me 6 for a single reason over a time span of 10 months?

You fucking peace of shits clearly wanted to discredit me in public .
(I'm sorry for using that kind of language ,since i don't use it normaly but these faggots make my blood boil)
As a gift for your love to me i will share all your info and past history with all your related people.

@Lauda about your consequences i give a shit.You want to go to court let's do it.

You took this path and i won't step back before my name is cleaned as peace of shits like you don't know what it means to have a name.
You choosed to discredit someone so lets see what people will say when getting a full detail about your past actions.

[suchmoon]

I see Lauda already removed one negativ feedback from me .Good start.

Oh sneaky Lauda, clearly got scared of your treatment. Here is how you can scare everyone else into removing their ratings against you:

• Go to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
• Paste the following into the trust list box:

Code:

~suchmoon
~The Pharmacist
~actmyname

• Click the Update button. Their ratings will be removed immediately.

[Thule]

I am not an expert

Oh don't sell yourself short, your trust score and your trust history indicates otherwise:

This justifies you to abuse on other members?

You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.

[nosacky]

I strongly agree with this

check my thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5060006.0


hopefully anyone can stop their false accusations

[suchmoon]

This justifies you to abuse on other members?

No, this justifies me to laugh at Quicksy.

[Thule]

This justifies you to abuse on other members?

No, this justifies me to laugh at Quicksy.

Looks like you are a retard demanding from other people quality posts but are unable to provide yourself a clear reference of somebody who scammed or tried to scam and being unable to admit it

[Quickseller]

I am not an expert

Oh don't sell yourself short, your trust score and your trust history indicates otherwise:

That looks a lot like a deflection to me.

Just because justification was not posted, does not mean it doesn’t exist and a small number of these types of instances is different than giving these types of ratings on a regular basis.

[Findingnemo]

I see Lauda already removed one negativ feedback from me .Good start.


But let's talk also about another topic about the abuse of DT members giving for the same action multiple negativ trust feedback even months later just to push somebody down .....


I got the negativ feedback for buying an account on august 2017.

For the same reference i get another negativ feedback from Lauda and ThePharmacist on January 2018 which means 5 months later.
Of course i didn't get it for buying that account but because i started questioning it to one of Lauda's gang members.

So after being punished for something which is not against forum rules 5 months later i get again negativ feedback from 2 stupid DT members for the same reference i recived 5 months ago.
Isn't this a clear abuse with the intention to discredit someone by giving him high negativ trustfeed ?

I still can see Lauda's negative feedback on your trust page,go and check the untrusted ratings because now lauda is not a DT member so it won't show up in default trust ratings.

Any DT member can give as much as ratings if they want and more DT members can give feedbacks for the same reason also which doesn't means abusing the system tho,and more over -2 or -32 it won't make any difference,simply you can't participate in any campaigns.

[suchmoon]

That looks a lot like a deflection to me.

I'm heartbroken as usual.

Just because justification was not posted, does not mean it doesn’t exist

Right. So you don't need to provide justification but everyone else needs to do so in a manner made up by you. Sounds almost legit.

and a small number of these types of instances is different than giving these types of ratings on a regular basis.

Dude... your trust history is littered with no-reference ratings, butthurt ratings, meaningless "I don't trust this person" ratings, etc. You're certainly not somebody who should lecture anyone on the topic of the trust system, Mr. Escrow Scammer.

I have clearly stated what I think of the OP and why, and provided a reference, and the OP was kind enough to confirm the validity of that rating with this awesome thread. If you don't like that you can... I don't know... cry or something.

[Thule]

VOD you are a DT member ?

How the fuck did you get it ?
You are even to dumb to read.
You gave me negativ feedback with the reason that i claimed that thePharmacist scammed 100 BTC from me ?


Where the fuck did you blind asshole read that ?
1.5x glasses are not helping anymore?

Would love to see your poor claim reference .And a stupid fuck like you is making false accuses on purpose ?

But i guess Lauda asked you to claim so ?Heh ?



You are now part of my love circle

Now show me fucker one sentence where i claimed i got scammed by ThePharmacist
BTW reading your low quality threads you must be a retarded poor old pot smoker.
If you call the topics of your threads quality to bitcointalk i guess that would be the biggest joke in the century

47 years old and still so stupid ?You are clearly a shame for all canadians.