[AMD/Nvidia/CPU] FinMiner

[FinMiner]

FinMiner 2.4.3
Ethash, CryptoNight (v6, v7, v8) on GPU and RandomHash/PASC on CPU.

We are glad to present you the newest version of next generation of FinMiner by Finom AG.
FinMiner is a versatile tool for mining cryptocurrencies which are based on Ethash, CryptoNight (v6, v7, v8) and RandomHash (PascalCoin) algorithms. This tool is suitable for both novice and professional users. Fast, reliable, efficient.
Our competitive advantages:

• Three in one - Ethash and CryptoNight on GPU and RandomHash on CPU in one miner.
• PASC on CPU - highest performance on the new algorithm RandomHash among competitors.
• Fastest CryptoNight on CUDA - we have done what others could not, and we continue working to increase efficiency. CryptoNight on AMD with FinMiner is also worth a try.
• Less stale shares - the number of stale shares on Ethash is reduced to the theoretical minimum value*.
• Effective mining: high performance and efficient utilization of electricity.
• Radeon RX550 (Baffin) - FinMiner has increased the level of hashrate on Ethash for these cards by 8-10%.
• AMD, Nvidia or CPU - it's up to you, FinMiner supports both types of GPU for mining Ethash and CryptoNight and CPU for RandomHash.
• Cross platform: FinMiner will bring you profit regardless of OS. The supported platforms are Windows and Linux.
• Stable and autonomous: FinMiner became smarter. Miner is able to control the state of video cards and, in case of hardware error (for instance: hashrate drop or GPU hang), it can reboot itself or the entire system.
• Customization flexibility: FinMiner is ready to operate, you just need to indicate a wallet. However, if you are experienced user, then additional parameters will help you to adjust the miner according to your own understanding of best efficiency.
• Standard API for remote access: The current version of FinMiner allows you to control the miner remotely by using standard software, such as ETHman Remote Manager.
• Advanced statistics: aside from hashrate, FinMiner will inform you about GPUs temperature, power consumption*, average hashrate and much more.
• Technical support 24.7: Our support service will answer all your questions promptly and with a pleasure.
• The high-qualified crew of experienced software engineers: We are permanently improving the efficiency of FinMiner, working on its optimization and expanding its functionality.
• Public product: we do not hide anything from you. You know who we are, and you can always contact us.
• Safe use: we are going through a Microsoft security check, and Windows Defender does not recognize FinMiner as a threat (does not remove or interfere with its work). Windows version of FinMiner is digitally signed, so it cannot contain viruses.

GitHub:     https://github.com/FinMiner/FinMiner
Download: for Linux
                for Windows

FinMiner - Best with nanopool.org

*  - The number of stale shares is highly dependent on the connection speed to a pool. The longer the ping response time is, the more likely it is for stale shares to appear.
** - Some video cards do not provide the data on power consumption; for such cards this information will not be displayed in FinMiner.

[1714133911]

1714133911

[1714133911]

1714133911

[1714133911]

1714133911

[1714133911]

1714133911

[1714133911]

1714133911

[polyminer1]

FinMiner 2.4.1
Ethash, CryptoNight (v6, v7, v8) on GPU and RandomHash/PASC on CPU.

You're aware that using CC0 licensed code requires you to share your code, and further modification of it, by law.
see  http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

[biospb]

Hi!

on 4c/4t cpu it is 30% faster than rhminer.
but on 6c/12t (win) - it is 30% slower - cpu usage is about 85%, and very high (~20%) kernel usage (sync object problem?)

also finminer 2.4.1 does not start mining if mport=0
and no hashrate/shares/rejects provided through api for pascalcoin:
[ "2.4 - PascalCoin", "36", "0;0;0", "", "0;0;0", "off", "", "pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15556", "0;0;0;0", "", "", "0", "0", "0", "0", "" ]


Cheers

[van-13]

Your miner supports hardfork Ubiq?

[biospb]

Code:

2018-11-21 19:44:09: PascalCoin: An error occured while parsing JSON reply from server. Message: {"method":"miner-notify","params":[{"block":262330,"version":4,"part1":"BA000400CA02200042B6D71C8BDD83EB6DAB79713BCFCFF330C4AB5BA2BB7B7C02A30882B54E31E62000CA1FF7B7804CE8BC3AFA0C5A7F7F72E372C30A3A3FFAC81563C67672781D2DFD20A1070000000000040004009FCABF1D",
"part3":"5567C1E322558ACF028D9ED2EE596FFD4D998A67CF775C403894441C89A8387BE3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991
PascalCoin last 10 min - Total: 341.753 H/s.
2018-11-21 19:44:10: New job from pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15556
PascalCoin - Total speed: 270.561 H/s, Total shares: 5 Rejected: 0, Time: 29:45
PascalCoin: CPU: 270.561 H/s
2018-11-21 19:44:13: PascalCoin: An error occured while parsing JSON reply from server. Message: B7852B85500000000","payload_start":"4e616e6f706f6f6c2f3535333131313534363430","target":268435456,"target_pow":"0000ffffff800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","timestamp":1542818624}],"id":0,"result":null,"error":null}

[thepra787]

Very good

[BillieCrypt]

You have made an interesting program for mining. Now this niche needs to be updated, because Claymore has stopped working on its programs, and the overall situation with mining does not look very good. I recommend you to add support for Siacoin, their hashrate fell significantly after hardfork, it makes sense in mining on the GPU.

[marlon45]

Tried a few different miners (only ever did CPU mining, never GPU unfortunately) and the best hashrate I ever got was with Moonify's app. Will definitely give this one a go. Congratz on the project

[FinMiner]

Hi!

on 4c/4t cpu it is 30% faster than rhminer.
but on 6c/12t (win) - it is 30% slower - cpu usage is about 85%, and very high (~20%) kernel usage (sync object problem?)

also finminer 2.4.1 does not start mining if mport=0
and no hashrate/shares/rejects provided through api for pascalcoin:
[ "2.4 - PascalCoin", "36", "0;0;0", "", "0;0;0", "off", "", "pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15556", "0;0;0;0", "", "", "0", "0", "0", "0", "" ]


Cheers

Hi!
What version do you use?
If you still have 2.4.1, please update it and compare results

[FinMiner]

Your miner supports hardfork Ubiq?

Will support soon

[FinMiner]

You have made an interesting program for mining. Now this niche needs to be updated, because Claymore has stopped working on its programs, and the overall situation with mining does not look very good. I recommend you to add support for Siacoin, their hashrate fell significantly after hardfork, it makes sense in mining on the GPU.

Thank you,
We will consider this opportunity

[FinMiner]

2018-11-21 19:44:09: PascalCoin: An error occured while parsing JSON reply from server. Message: {"method":"miner-notify","params":
...
...
...
B7852B85500000000","payload_start":"4e616e6f706f6f6c2f3535333131313534363430","target":268435456,"target_pow":"0000ffffff800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","timestamp":1542818624}],"id":0,"result":null,"error":null}

Thanks a bunch,
We will fix it ASAP

[ol92]

On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads)  with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.

With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.

But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.

[FinMiner]

On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads)  with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.

With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.

But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.

We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.

[ol92]

On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads)  with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.

With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.

But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.

We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.

Ok, thanks, I have already installed WSL. I will try tonight. Does performance on WSL similar than a proper linux installation ?

[ol92]

On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads)  with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.

With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.

But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.

We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.

Ok, thanks, I have already installed WSL. I will try tonight. Does performance on WSL similar than a proper linux installation ?

Are you sure the higher hashrate is real and not a bug:

In rhminer from polyminer, in release notes of 0.9.4:

Fixed wrong hashrate on linux. (a thread-concurrency bug made H/S show-up higher on linux.)

PS: I have 4450k/s on linux with 24 threads (somewhat optimal setting, more threads gives better hahsrate at the beginning but decreases with time), against 3200kh/s on windows.

[vacarosie200]

i try it
slower by 3% then was know miners

eth 1050ti only 13.4 mh/s

[FinMiner]

On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads)  with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.

With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.

But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.

We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.

Ok, thanks, I have already installed WSL. I will try tonight. Does performance on WSL similar than a proper linux installation ?

Are you sure the higher hashrate is real and not a bug:

In rhminer from polyminer, in release notes of 0.9.4:

Fixed wrong hashrate on linux. (a thread-concurrency bug made H/S show-up higher on linux.)

PS: I have 4450k/s on linux with 24 threads (somewhat optimal setting, more threads gives better hahsrate at the beginning but decreases with time), against 3200kh/s on windows.

Hashrate should be similar

[FinMiner]

On pascal (randomhash): hashrate decrease on windows on a 7960x (16 cores, 32 threads)  with all 32 threads: from above 3500h/s to lower than 3000. To avoid this problem, I need to limit to 24-26 threads, with around 3200h/s.

With rhmininer with 32 threads, I am at around 3100 h/s.
So far, your miner is better: 3200h/s with 24 threads, 175w, instead of 3100 at 200w with rhminer.

But maybe you can manage to solve the problem of hashrate decrease at 32 threads, with a stable 3500 h/s.

We are working on it, however, until a new version appears you should try to install windows 10 linux subsystem and run linux version of FinMiner. I promise you, results will be better.

Ok, thanks, I have already installed WSL. I will try tonight. Does performance on WSL similar than a proper linux installation ?

Are you sure the higher hashrate is real and not a bug:

In rhminer from polyminer, in release notes of 0.9.4:

Fixed wrong hashrate on linux. (a thread-concurrency bug made H/S show-up higher on linux.)

PS: I have 4450k/s on linux with 24 threads (somewhat optimal setting, more threads gives better hahsrate at the beginning but decreases with time), against 3200kh/s on windows.

I am sure,
We did no have the problem with hashrate reported as rhminer had. You can check the hashrate on any pool.

[FinMiner]

i try it
slower by 3% then was know miners

eth 1050ti only 13.4 mh/s

What algo you are talking about?