Obelisk SC1 Review | Earning $90 a Day | ASIC Blake2b Siacoin Miner

[VoskCoin]

The Obelisk SC1 Siacoin Blake2b ASIC miner is earning $90 dollars per day in this cryptocurrency bear market, lets review it!
Watch my Obelisk SC1 mining @ Luxor - http://bit.ly/luxorsc1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsfnsChedDY


Nebulous Labs has forked (invalidated) the Bitmain Antminer A3's & Innosilicon S11's off of their Blake2b Siacoin network in favor of preserving their Obelisk investment. Obelisk SC1 Blake2b ASIC miners are now the only mining equipment capable of mining the top 50 cryptocurrency by marketcap Siacoin and thus the earnings for this batch 1 obelisk sc1 asic miner are rather ridiculous!

Wondering how to setup your Obelisk ASIC SC1 DCR1 miner?
Find your IP address, login to router or use Who's On My Wifi

Enter the IP address corresponding to your miner in your browser, and then enter admin as the user and admin as the password to login to your obelisk miner.

Ex. pool config to mine Siacoin w/ Luxor 0% currently SIA pool

stratum+tcp://sc-us.luxor.tech:3333

Wallet address . worker name

e6374ba7874a7c441d277320f99398a39999179dfa26932aa38291f18487b564d8953a17efa2.yt

Password

x

Links to resources in the Obelisk SC1 Review video

Siacoin official website - http://bit.ly/2RwYdS8
Obelisk Miner official website - http://bit.ly/2QsMRht
CoinGecko Siacoin to USD calculator - http://bit.ly/2quJ6xk
Watch my Obelisk SC1 mining @ Luxor - http://bit.ly/luxorsc1
Obelisk Scanner firmware updater (sc1/dcr1) - http://bit.ly/2QjT6ol
Hyperspace, Siacoin Classic, Sia Prime - http://bit.ly/2JEiEKb
Hyperspace spacecash bitcointalk ANN - http://bit.ly/2ALSYZb
Siacoin Classic bitcointalk ANN thread - http://bit.ly/2PMBHaZ
Obelisk SC1 Miner Batch 1 official details - http://bit.ly/2PcMDPB

Mining Rig Parts IN STOCK on Amazon - http://geni.us/WQd7cCs

VoskCoin Patreon - https://www.patreon.com/VoskCoin
VoskCoin Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/VoskCoin/
VoskCoin Reddit - https://www.reddit.com/r/voskcoin/
VoskCoin Discord Server Invite - https://discord.gg/FGGmS2z
VoskCoin Twitter - https://twitter.com/VoskCoin
VoskCoin Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/voskcoin/

VoskCoin Official Donation Addresses, support appreciated!
BTC - 12PsgKuhcJrEqJbD3oMN7rcEcuyqyqRznL
ETH - 0xDEe6A2ae293F8C58Ef71649658344BbF382b6e70
ZEC - t1ZoVF5t75NahSAfuwpcyHA8uzkPyocXpJZ
Loki - 
LScbLXmws9RA4SXVz5GhGm3N2YfKShw6MQGeyAjYc3bE5nYHUw3UUWxgKGN8kCnWQkfZEGN1PBxX7Zk y3aVJSpGxTZTuDLB
XMR - 484HoyS4h2fenvLKQkuUV7FwnJaGK8LMX43tiJ3UZdVU53d2MxFiQ1jbSfyorsXZVs1SvoPVh4nipjd 7b4GVgFGmCgygdpV
Doge - DHgX7vJjBsmYcB1GgubGtu3TVJkqQgCG6B

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to http://Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

Whether you agree or disagree with the decision of the Siacoin development team aka Nebulous labs please do not direct that at me. I am simply reporting on how this miner performed pre and post fork, I have already voiced my opinion in the last video. I am not a professional investor, this is not investment advice, and obviously I own cryptocurrencies.

[1714951446]

1714951446

[1714951446]

1714951446

[yrk1957]

It was making $90 only in the first day beacuse there were no blocks found for 14 hours after fork due to an error in difficulty adjustment timing. Now it’s more like $65.

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

[korhank]

Is it really logical to buy q new Obelisk nowadays? What's your opinions?

[VoskCoin]

It was making $90 only in the first day beacuse there were no blocks found for 14 hours after fork due to an error in difficulty adjustment timing. Now it’s more like $65.

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

Do you have a link to another sc1 pool side? Would like to compare earnings especially if it’s on another pool

It is unfortunate miners were the casualties here however a3 for example weren’t even profitable anymore anyway

Not saying it’s right, but I am just saying lol

[VoskCoin]

Is it really logical to buy q new Obelisk nowadays? What's your opinions?

You can’t buy a new one at the original price of 2500 or less anymore, with everything in crypto it’s a gamble. I think if you get this miner soon at a more reasonable price of 3-5k it could be a decent move. Otherwise you could be left waiting a long time to break even

[yrk1957]

It was making $90 only in the first day beacuse there were no blocks found for 14 hours after fork due to an error in difficulty adjustment timing. Now it’s more like $65.

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

Do you have a link to another sc1 pool side? Would like to compare earnings especially if it’s on another pool

It is unfortunate miners were the casualties here however a3 for example weren’t even profitable anymore anyway

Not saying it’s right, but I am just saying lol

No, I am on Luxor too.

[VoskCoin]

It was making $90 only in the first day beacuse there were no blocks found for 14 hours after fork due to an error in difficulty adjustment timing. Now it’s more like $65.

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

Do you have a link to another sc1 pool side? Would like to compare earnings especially if it’s on another pool

It is unfortunate miners were the casualties here however a3 for example weren’t even profitable anymore anyway

Not saying it’s right, but I am just saying lol

No, I am on Luxor too.

Do you have just one unit?

[yrk1957]

It was making $90 only in the first day beacuse there were no blocks found for 14 hours after fork due to an error in difficulty adjustment timing. Now it’s more like $65.

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

Do you have a link to another sc1 pool side? Would like to compare earnings especially if it’s on another pool

It is unfortunate miners were the casualties here however a3 for example weren’t even profitable anymore anyway

Not saying it’s right, but I am just saying lol

No, I am on Luxor too.

Do you have just one unit?

No, a few;)

Edit: Doing about 33500 SC in "72hr Rewards" per unit.

[VoskCoin]

It was making $90 only in the first day beacuse there were no blocks found for 14 hours after fork due to an error in difficulty adjustment timing. Now it’s more like $65.

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

Do you have a link to another sc1 pool side? Would like to compare earnings especially if it’s on another pool

It is unfortunate miners were the casualties here however a3 for example weren’t even profitable anymore anyway

Not saying it’s right, but I am just saying lol

No, I am on Luxor too.

Do you have just one unit?

No, a few;)

Edit: Doing about 33500 SC in "72hr Rewards" per unit.

here's my chart

[nsummy]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

[yrk1957]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

[Marvell2]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

Asic manufacturers ARE the bad guy wtf u blabbing about, I own zero obelsik and I applaud the move by sia
developmers have to take a hard line vs the champions of centralization, bitman and innosilion compete with thier own customers to mine and also keep they best gear to themselves and thier friends.

we need more forks to drive them out

[nsummy]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

You are crazy if you think they aren't mining this themselves.

One address with 130 workers:  https://siamining.com/addresses/572ccd09746e4b82666bb1c947bb4aef52f655e0e96ddb7c14c08b10165d68efbc7b63c8490f
Another with 67 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/06cc9f9196afb1a1efa21f72160d508f0cc192b581770fde57420cab795a2913fb4e1c85aa30
Another with 48 workers: https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/a152ee47ef01407055494ed24b4af3f1caa73a463550e5ce78e3420a661dbe5887af1242c18a
39 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/3ca729e03bcad696a2500316be194349069ee2823a7e953163f431e8d2d1a0f1d7a075315d1e

[Marvell2]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

You are crazy if you think they aren't mining this themselves.

One address with 130 workers:  https://siamining.com/addresses/572ccd09746e4b82666bb1c947bb4aef52f655e0e96ddb7c14c08b10165d68efbc7b63c8490f
Another with 67 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/06cc9f9196afb1a1efa21f72160d508f0cc192b581770fde57420cab795a2913fb4e1c85aa30
Another with 48 workers: https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/a152ee47ef01407055494ed24b4af3f1caa73a463550e5ce78e3420a661dbe5887af1242c18a
39 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/3ca729e03bcad696a2500316be194349069ee2823a7e953163f431e8d2d1a0f1d7a075315d1e

even if they are , its their coin , they actually give a damn about thier ecosystem and economy unlike bitmain and innno who just dump into oblivion.  If they are mining they probably need to in order to get back market share of the coins that inno and bitmain haven’t had time to dumping
comparing the dev mining to the asic company dumpers is truely apples to oranges.

[yrk1957]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

You are crazy if you think they aren't mining this themselves.

One address with 130 workers:  https://siamining.com/addresses/572ccd09746e4b82666bb1c947bb4aef52f655e0e96ddb7c14c08b10165d68efbc7b63c8490f
Another with 67 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/06cc9f9196afb1a1efa21f72160d508f0cc192b581770fde57420cab795a2913fb4e1c85aa30
Another with 48 workers: https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/a152ee47ef01407055494ed24b4af3f1caa73a463550e5ce78e3420a661dbe5887af1242c18a
39 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/3ca729e03bcad696a2500316be194349069ee2823a7e953163f431e8d2d1a0f1d7a075315d1e

You are just throwing muck without knowing any facts.

Did you know that Inno was self-mining 45% of the network?

Did you know that batch 1 SC1 has 3600 odd units, of which 20% were kept aside for Obelisk's own mining, and they they did not actually manufacture those 20%?

So if they did not make the 20% they had declared they would mine with initially, then why would they mining with these 200 units now? They could have just made 20% more and made boatloads of money now.

Now tell me how many of your ASICs were bricked by this fork?

[abstractHaze]

im upset vosk gives this attention. i know ur reviewing. but fuck them soul sucking fucks.

[nsummy]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool.  

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

You are crazy if you think they aren't mining this themselves.

One address with 130 workers:  https://siamining.com/addresses/572ccd09746e4b82666bb1c947bb4aef52f655e0e96ddb7c14c08b10165d68efbc7b63c8490f
Another with 67 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/06cc9f9196afb1a1efa21f72160d508f0cc192b581770fde57420cab795a2913fb4e1c85aa30
Another with 48 workers: https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/a152ee47ef01407055494ed24b4af3f1caa73a463550e5ce78e3420a661dbe5887af1242c18a
39 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/3ca729e03bcad696a2500316be194349069ee2823a7e953163f431e8d2d1a0f1d7a075315d1e

You are just throwing muck without knowing any facts.

Did you know that Inno was self-mining 45% of the network?

Did you know that batch 1 SC1 has 3600 odd units, of which 20% were kept aside for Obelisk's own mining, and they they did not actually manufacture those 20%?

So if they did not make the 20% they had declared they would mine with initially, then why would they mining with these 200 units now? They could have just made 20% more and made boatloads of money now.

Now tell me how many of your ASICs were bricked by this fork?

Yes I knew they were self-mining.  Who cares?  Sia wanted Asics, they got them.  This fork would have happened regardless if Inno was self-mining.  They would have found another excuse.

I am not throwing muck, just pointing out irregularities.  I have a hard time believing someone pre-ordered 150 of these units.   How do you know they didn't keep the extra units?  Because they said so?

I had zero units bricked.  I was smart enough to sell my A3, as soon as Vosk said he got rid of his!

[nsummy]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

You are crazy if you think they aren't mining this themselves.

One address with 130 workers:  https://siamining.com/addresses/572ccd09746e4b82666bb1c947bb4aef52f655e0e96ddb7c14c08b10165d68efbc7b63c8490f
Another with 67 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/06cc9f9196afb1a1efa21f72160d508f0cc192b581770fde57420cab795a2913fb4e1c85aa30
Another with 48 workers: https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/a152ee47ef01407055494ed24b4af3f1caa73a463550e5ce78e3420a661dbe5887af1242c18a
39 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/3ca729e03bcad696a2500316be194349069ee2823a7e953163f431e8d2d1a0f1d7a075315d1e

even if they are , its their coin , they actually give a damn about thier ecosystem and economy unlike bitmain and innno who just dump into oblivion.  If they are mining they probably need to in order to get back market share of the coins that inno and bitmain haven’t had time to dumping
comparing the dev mining to the asic company dumpers is truely apples to oranges.

You have overdosed on the Sia Kool-aid my friend.

[Marvell2]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool. 

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

You are crazy if you think they aren't mining this themselves.

One address with 130 workers:  https://siamining.com/addresses/572ccd09746e4b82666bb1c947bb4aef52f655e0e96ddb7c14c08b10165d68efbc7b63c8490f
Another with 67 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/06cc9f9196afb1a1efa21f72160d508f0cc192b581770fde57420cab795a2913fb4e1c85aa30
Another with 48 workers: https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/a152ee47ef01407055494ed24b4af3f1caa73a463550e5ce78e3420a661dbe5887af1242c18a
39 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/3ca729e03bcad696a2500316be194349069ee2823a7e953163f431e8d2d1a0f1d7a075315d1e

even if they are , its their coin , they actually give a damn about thier ecosystem and economy unlike bitmain and innno who just dump into oblivion.  If they are mining they probably need to in order to get back market share of the coins that inno and bitmain haven’t had time to dumping
comparing the dev mining to the asic company dumpers is truely apples to oranges.

You have overdosed on the Sia Kool-aid my friend.

I don't really care about SIA or its project, I actually have 3 A3s collecting dust as well.

This fork hurts innosilicon and Bitmain thats the coolaid I am overdosed on quite happy with that .

[VoskCoin]

Well the fork should have served a lesson to Innosilicon. It’s unfortunate that their customers were caught in the cross-fire. They would do well to think twice before buying anything from Innosilliocn due to its shady practices.

I hope you are joking.  If anything this is a lesson showing us the future viability of Sia.  Nebulous was looking for any excuse for this fork.  First Bitmain was the bad guy, then it was Innosilicon.  Its no coincidence that the "attack on the network" reached its crescendo as soon as Obelisk shipped out all of batch one.   If you are going to call Innosilicon shady, I think you have to do the same in regards to Obelisks business practices.

Now we have the company's miners all mining on their centralized pool.  

Lets see Inno self-mines and owns 45% of the network? Not shady?

Obelisk Tech makes these miner, but forgoes the 20% it was supposed run on their own, and further more decides not to manufacture any more iterations? Shady?

Leave the viability of Sia Storage aside, its got nothing to do with miners.

You are crazy if you think they aren't mining this themselves.

One address with 130 workers:  https://siamining.com/addresses/572ccd09746e4b82666bb1c947bb4aef52f655e0e96ddb7c14c08b10165d68efbc7b63c8490f
Another with 67 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/06cc9f9196afb1a1efa21f72160d508f0cc192b581770fde57420cab795a2913fb4e1c85aa30
Another with 48 workers: https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/a152ee47ef01407055494ed24b4af3f1caa73a463550e5ce78e3420a661dbe5887af1242c18a
39 workers:  https://mining.luxor.tech/miners/SC/3ca729e03bcad696a2500316be194349069ee2823a7e953163f431e8d2d1a0f1d7a075315d1e

You are just throwing muck without knowing any facts.

Did you know that Inno was self-mining 45% of the network?

Did you know that batch 1 SC1 has 3600 odd units, of which 20% were kept aside for Obelisk's own mining, and they they did not actually manufacture those 20%?

So if they did not make the 20% they had declared they would mine with initially, then why would they mining with these 200 units now? They could have just made 20% more and made boatloads of money now.

Now tell me how many of your ASICs were bricked by this fork?

Yes I knew they were self-mining.  Who cares?  Sia wanted Asics, they got them.  This fork would have happened regardless if Inno was self-mining.  They would have found another excuse.

I am not throwing muck, just pointing out irregularities.  I have a hard time believing someone pre-ordered 150 of these units.   How do you know they didn't keep the extra units?  Because they said so?

I had zero units bricked.  I was smart enough to sell my A3, as soon as Vosk said he got rid of his!

Yeah the A3 was definitely not a unit I thought would have a long shelf-life lol, fortunately they were selling in the 2000s for awhile.

It was a classic bitmain release, get as early as possible, overclock as much as possible, and sell before Bitmain or Inno saturate the hashrate. Also to be fair the guy I resold to also recouped his investment as well