How to choose bounty?

[Mpamaegbu]

Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?

I had those cancelled out because they're not true indicators to choosing a credible project. I have participated in ICOs that had all that yet they scammed. What about Viox? Westerncoin? Hextracoin? They all had those features but where are they today?

[1714971149]

1714971149

[1714971149]

1714971149

[1714971149]

1714971149

[MuhNofa]

I think what you mentioned is enough to make sure the bounty is good or not I also often make bounty selections like the ones you mentioned above, but sometimes I also check their youtube account to see if their team / ceo explain their project to the public

[Favouredhart]

What i do before choosing a bounty is this: i would first check the white paper, then check the project team, join their social platforms,check out for the activeness, also the use case of the project. With these, if i am satisfied, i start the bounty.

[libert19]

Just want to add that if you want to make sure to rewarded for your work then choose projects who have already reached the soft cap.

[kuverty]

Here are some things that I look for when I decide a bounty is worthy.
Active development team.
The project team is public.
Interesting partnerships.
Not a long roadmap.

[phuonganhdpa]

it's correct. The things you listed are quite complete. But the fact is that scam projects are also becoming more sophisticated. They will also do most of this list. In the end, the above things are just to limit the scam. Not more

[m.rifki]

it's correct. The things you listed are quite complete. But the fact is that scam projects are also becoming more sophisticated. They will also do most of this list. In the end, the above things are just to limit the scam. Not more

unfortunately now the project scam is also starting to develop their abilities. it's very difficult now to see a project scam by just looking at the team and selling it. there is a project that is almost very perfect and gets bounty participants very much, and finally at the end of the campaign they disappear and don't pay.

[yulchatar]

Many criteria are not really indicative. I, like many, most often choose a project watching the team. But for the bounty, the campaign manager is also important. Therefore, it is preferable for me to work with a trusted manager, with whom I have already worked with before.

[bitcoin31]

Maybe those number of members in telegram is not accurate because base on my experienced  I joined in ICO last year 2018 and I see there is thousands of members in telegram group chat and maybe that is good because maybe a lot of people have interest to invest to the campaign but Im wrong because after that the ICO was scam and I see there is a lot of deleted account and maybe those deleted account in telegram is the team who have a lot of account. Hard to trust now because there is a lot of fake project.

[qomariah95]

Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?

I think points 1,3,5 and 6. That's what I think is obligatory to know. With that going forward, of course, the bounty will be very good. And actually it all depends on the investor. If investors are interested in the project it is certainly more good.

[likit123]

ICO ratings may be biased and moreover, bribed. As for the design of the site - I do not agree. Only in nature, the male must be bright to attract females. And here everything must be restrained, clearly, without excesses.
The number of subscribers in the telegram says nothing. When the project turns out to be a scam, all the signatories will suffer equally. I agree with the 5 and 6 points.

[Jrfranco]

Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?

Choosing the right bounty is important in order to reward yourself from your hard work, one thing to consider is how in demand the project is, and it is appealing to the investors and of course the trust rating of the bounty manager, managing on it. Of course, you should definitely more background check on the team members of the project because some others are just using other identity in order for them to gather more investors.

[reynald70]

I think to choose a good Bounty must see from a team that is always active on all social media and have many good partners, so that if we participate in the Bounty campaign you will feel that the team is always active and has good news, and choose if a project get Softcap. Because when the ICO project has gotten Softcap it will usually be registered in exchange.

[ivaf]

Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique don’t even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?

I also try to read whitepaper - how the document is written, whether it displays all aspects of the project and so on.
Also a big plus is the availability of a prototype of the working product of the project (MVP), the presence of developments in the repository on the githab.

[hdclover]

Nowadays its very hard to find a bounty campaign which actually pays. Forget about $1000, its now hard to earn even $100. Those days are definately gone.
Find a campaign which do you think will actually pay. Don't join campaigns from new managers who promises Like millions of dollars for bounty. Its just non sense.

[NaXxow]

I choose bounty in terms of roadmap and the credibility of team or devs. The idea and the potential of the project is the highlights on how to choose bounty. And also, do not expect high rewards on those, because legit projects are not promising very good result rather showing the potential and growth of the project.

[minttop]

I have a special strategy regarding bounties. During these hard times I prefer payouts in fix tokens, but as for majority of my projects I don't receive tokens due to bad market.
You know, ICOs don't collect money and don't pay to hunters

[strunberg]

I have a special strategy regarding bounties. During these hard times I prefer payouts in fix tokens, but as for majority of my projects I don't receive tokens due to bad market.
You know, ICOs don't collect money and don't pay to hunters

if developers team decided using fix token reward scheme, i am sure the risk from dumping price could be minimize.they will spend less token allocation for bounty.

[benres]

Great! Thanks for sharing your criteria and indeed you got the top and most important in choosing a good bounty platform to promote and be a community member of! At this time of the bear market I guess one thing that I can contribute is to make sure that the platform that we must be joining should have plans to solve most of the problems of adaption of cryptocurrency! I hope that the more criteria will be suggested in your thread.

[Adhichan]

I have a special strategy regarding bounties. During these hard times I prefer payouts in fix tokens, but as for majority of my projects I don't receive tokens due to bad market.
You know, ICOs don't collect money and don't pay to hunters

if developers team decided using fix token reward scheme, i am sure the risk from dumping price could be minimize.they will spend less token allocation for bounty.

if using scheme could make certainity about token price, i think all bounty manager could use this.it will make protection to their investors.no one hold much coins that maybe dumped in market.