Yumerium and bounty hunters - Looks like a SCAM

[Tosin12]

This deceiving and unethical behavior in managing of bounty campaigns is being orchestrated by the team and bounty manager from the beginning of the campaign by deliberately including in the rules and regulations of the bounty the right to make some changes at their own discretion which majority of bounty hunters are not taking cognizance of, the moment we start reading and understanding bounty rules, the less the accusations of bounty scam in respect to bounty pool

[coinlocket$]

Second project left from Amazix after Equi same thing, they also left flipnick, let's see what will happen on that one too.

[Sama517]

This is very bad of an ICO and its bounty campaign. How can people suffer and work tirelessly for you over several months and you end up reducing their rewards? It is not good at all. Even FTEC did the same thing giving reason that it was as a result of the low token sales. The hunters ended up getting little or even nothing.

[Terrmit]

I can say one thing that fraudsters are entering a new level. They even hire professional professionals who draw all this to them. According to this information, I can not understand scam. To be honest, little-known projects are much more successful.

[melomanskiy]

I saw a lot of information about this project, but I did not think that such an incident would turn out with bounty hunters. This is definitely not fair to the people who worked on advertising the project for about six months. I hope that you will resolve this issue and in case the leadership does not go to the meeting, you will be able to punish them in all fairness.
 

[melomanskiy]

Second project left from Amazix after Equi same thing, they also left flipnick, let's see what will happen on that one too.

I hope that this situation will not happen again with the FlipNpik company, otherwise it will be a shame) they also have a bounty that lasts 35 weeks. And this is a very long time. It remains only to cross your fingers and think about the good)

[olgahappy]

This is terrible. I sympathize with those who participated there. Recently, scammers are becoming more cunning. A lot of people don't want to do bounty anymore. Because of such projects, the mood is falling.

[GREENch]

Hi, GREENch!

I'm, yura04071989, conducted YUMERIUM bounty Round 2. The entire bounty campaign was calculated and even more, given the incorrect assessment of the first round of content creation - we rechecked it for free at the request of the bounty members. On October 26, all google forms and spreadsheets were counted and transferred to the YUMERIUM team. Our work on this was completed and according to the CEO's distribution of tokens was supposed to begin within a week from the moment of transfer. Then in the bounty management chat, a message was received from the CEO that 2% could not be distributed. We provided all the arguments regarding the fact that the company does not fulfill its obligations to the participants of the bounty. Considering the situation on the market and a small volume of sales, we proposed to make the distribution of tokens in parts, or freeze the tokens of the participants of the bounty and unfreeze them after a lapse of time, but pay the participants' reward in full. The team said that would think about this option.
A few days later, the team wrote that they finally decided that in this situation, some of the tokens will be burned and the bounty payment will be 2% from 26,362,027.94 YUM. And they ask us to remove the size of the bounty pool and the related figures from the bounty thread to avoid misunderstandings due to changes.
1)We did not change Bounty thread!
2)We also didn't ban participants who express their opinions either in the main chat or in the Bounty chat.

In the picture above, there are 2 figures:
263620.3 - the amount that the team left for bounty round 2 (similar to round 1)
and 6338137 - the amount that we left in the cap since this was the initial condition that the campaign refused to fulfill.

Unfortunately, this decision of the project team, on which neither the first round team or the second round bounty team can in any way influence, our opinion is extremely negative about this attitude of the development team towards the participants of the bounty and they (the development team) know about it.

Hi, yura04071989.

Thank you for explaining the situation. It would be nice if you could attach screenshots of the negotiations with the development team. I think that on the basis of these data, everyone who wants to show the true face of the YUMERIUM project will be able to write articles. It will also be possible to send the material to well-known crypto publishers for publication.

[KotiKo]

I did not expect such a trick. Although I was a little tense when the Amazix stopped working on Yumerium. I think that the bounty manager has nothing to do with it, all responsibility lies directly with the team

[l10no]

many projects do bad things on bounty hunters, not only Yumerium, whether it's from the team or cheating game bounty manager, indeed we have been required to be honest about being hunters, while those who make their own rules actually violate them

[warning_btc]

I am ot be surprised from project wich postpone their ICO, cant collect moneys, change bounty managing team.
There is many scam signals duing ico

[ropyu1978]

I saw the yumerium having problems from the first time ico was held. yes, I forgot to read it on meta, if I'm not mistaken but it seems true that this ico has a problem. maybe you should discuss with the team and the developer
however, if sales do not reach the target, this is common
(please correct if I'm wrong).

[kutangterbang]

indeed the team was not open, they should have said what was the biggest problem with the project, so they distributed their tokens dishonestly. or indeed from the beginning they intend to deceive all participants

[sergei1703]

indeed the team was not open, they should have said what was the biggest problem with the project, so they distributed their tokens dishonestly. or indeed from the beginning they intend to deceive all participants

All we can make now - it is tell everyone that this project is a full bullshit, and there is no good future here. Because if you start with a fraud - you product will die very very soon. Bounty participants have helped this project to raise money - and Yumerium abused us!

[Sevarchik]

I am participated in the first round of his bounty campaign.
How i understand they want to pay 2% from raised funds, and if they sold small amount of tokens, then there all is fair, or i am not understand something ?

[mrSamuel]

project developers behaved very ugly towards the people who helped them. With this act they have spoiled their reputation. Now, no self-respecting investor will pay attention to this project.

[judeafante]

Once again, carefully re-reading the conditions of participation in the bounty campaign, I come to the conclusion that we can not say that the project SCAM, as they left a loophole:

If we talk about the fact that the project management can be trusted, or I would dare to invest my money in them, then definitely not. But in fact, they did not violate the conditions of the bounty campaign.

That's very ugly and unacceptable so if they change their rule and say we did not hit hardcap so no bounty hunters will be going to get their rewards is that acceptable they can change the rules but not about giving rewards to bounty hunters, bounty manager should be the one to blame if rewards are changed after the ICO.

[3acaga]

The bounty manager didn’t completely blame it. Each had a choice and opportunity not to take part in the bounty campaign.
By the rules of clause 2, the developers left a spare option for deceiving the hunters - but the hunters decided to take part in the bounty themselves.
P.S. For the future, bounty hunters need to learn more about bounty campaigns and not to participate if they are not completely sure.

[beeelzebub]

Well, another ico choose to scam bounty hunters. Not unexpected unfortunately.

Did they reach the hard cap? Or are they giving out tokens with the ratio of raised money compared the hard cap?

[Vit83]

ICO must understand that positive bounty hunters will write about it in the hundreds of sources, when they making unfair moves they will say about this thousand places. Crypto community is quite small, and doing such things will show everybody their real attitude to the community. In fact I don't know about this ICO anything, but I will remember and never buy them or participate their further events.