Why do developer find it difficult to pay bounty hunters

[Tigra3458]

Not all bounty programs did not pay bounty hunters, many did. But what is there is that there seems to be more  developers with scam intent than before.

Today it is possible to notice also that many eminent bounty the managers have ceased to accompany ISO in protest against the conditions obviously foreshadowing the failure.

[demenBTC]

I see the reason to be the intention to scam bounty hunters. A reliable project will be upright from the beginning to distribution of tokens but if they are shitty, they keep giving excuses and eventually not pay up.

by not paying bounty hunters means that the project has shown itself to be a scam, the development team will pay and seriously if they really want to develop their tokens in the future, the bounty hunter is like a double-edged knife, bounty hunters are very useful to help make ico and bounty hunters can destroy the image of a project that is difficult to pay

[Gopo6789]

Now this topic is especially important, because many projects use the fact that the rules prescribe the point that they can change the rules at any time. Many agree to send far away such projects, but many bounty hunters are willing to work for any rules and for any money potamu that$ 20 in their country a lot of money

[Xiroartoni]

Looking at the situation at hand now in cryptocurrency bounty hunting case, we could all see that bounty hunter has turn to a cage of war between dev and hunter these days and that really gives me concern.

Doing bounty does mean that bounty hunters are useless or something cause the way and manner developers are handling hunters now gives a very wrong signal and I see this technology as a way forward for all not a mix to scam people or get rich over night.

Though the technology is decentralized and more why we are having issue as the developer can't be sue or sue , so any bounty that hunters participate in is not a contract as we do have a clause in the terms which says " the team can change the rules any anytime " which make the whole contract useless and not legal as both party have right to decide what is good for the project after the first agreement is sign and if there must be a change them there must be an agreement between the two party not that one party will just decide on what he think will favour him alone and will now point out to the clause that say " they can change the rules anytime" 

Imagine a project who lock bounty reward for 90days base on agreement and even after that time they never release it and keep posting the hunters.

Imagine a project that assign 3% of the total supply to hunters and only used 1% and after the hard work of the hunters completing the task stipulated in the rules , the team change the rules and reduce the reward from 1% to 0.07% , like the real reward is 1M and was reduce to 70,000 for all bounty hunters .

Allowing this type of things happening and going Scott free is dmagi g the image of this great technology and making it look to newbies as a scam when many are still agitating and we that are in this space still give them chance to bad mouth our great community which I think need a very urgent attention to curb all scam project .

Because they know they'll get away with it. Developers care little that someone has spent a lot of time on their favorite product. They are ready to save on everything and everyone. So far, there are no regulators that would protect the rights of the bounty. I only hope that such projects will not live long. Bad always comes back and greed sometimes very quickly finished with the team. A good team with a good project usually pays for the work of the bounty. I hope that the old days will return and we still earn our

[spngebob]

Because they know they'll get away with it. Developers care little that someone has spent a lot of time on their favorite product. They are ready to save on everything and everyone. So far, there are no regulators that would protect the rights of the bounty. I only hope that such projects will not live long. Bad always comes back and greed sometimes very quickly finished with the team. A good team with a good project usually pays for the work of the bounty. I hope that the old days will return and we still earn our

Only reason why they are getting away is because there are not enough complains for not receiving payouts.    In one regular bounty campaign there are more than thousand hunters I think if all these people start not only complaining but spread word that they were scammed, these projects will lose their costumers in short time and it will be in their best interest to send payments then.

[Tylev]

Now bounty hunters have developed very tense relations with ICO projects, because the ICO team inscribes such clauses into the conditions of joining their project, which from a legal point of view are generally illegal, since they arbitrarily allow any changes by one party to the transaction. There are wines in this and bounty hunters who join the project, even without delving particularly into the text of the terms of the agreement. This enables unscrupulous ICO teams to abuse their rights. This should be changed now or will be changed already when states begin to regulate this type of activity.

[earnbitcoins]

There are bounty hunters living in countries where jurisdictions are unclear or outright illegal to obtain crypto. As such, there are many bounty programs conducting KYC procedures - which brought the attention to the fact that there were actually too many people abusing the bounty programs - creating duplicate accounts, fake entries, fake accounts, etc.

So all in all, what goes around comes around?

[Haunebu]

Now bounty hunters have developed very tense relations with ICO projects, because the ICO team inscribes such clauses into the conditions of joining their project, which from a legal point of view are generally illegal, since they arbitrarily allow any changes by one party to the transaction. There are wines in this and bounty hunters who join the project, even without delving particularly into the text of the terms of the agreement. This enables unscrupulous ICO teams to abuse their rights. This should be changed now or will be changed already when states begin to regulate this type of activity.

This is true. 2018 has amplified the importance of finding good bounty campaigns since so many bounty hunters have been deceived in different ways and sidelined leading to a relatively bad impression of bounty campaigns in general.

For example, I had participated in a particular bounty campaign during the first half of this year and it has been delayed until the first half of next year which goes to show how horrible bounties have become in general.

Bitcoin paying bounties are far more reliable in general and I advise participating in such bounties when compared to risking your time and energy for a bounty where you might not earn anything at all.

[karagun125]

i think there are lot of reasons why the project developer is difficult to pay the bounty hunters. the one reason is that maybe the project's target soft cap has not been reached, and therefore they can't pay something to the bounty hunters. the second reason maybe the project is just fraud and they are only using bounty hunters to promote their project.

[oper802]

I see the reason to be the intention to scam bounty hunters. A reliable project will be upright from the beginning to distribution of tokens but if they are shitty, they keep giving excuses and eventually not pay up.

Yeah, sometimes this is happening to us. Becoming a bounty hunter is not an easy thing, we spent much time to promote a project. And after all of that, we are not paid. Actually, this is a risk of becoming a bounty hunter, but we still feel bad for that.

[mariaana]

There is always a worry for bounty hunters now. There are ICO that reach softcap but is still not able to pay bounty hunters. I have a bad experience with investment or security tokens that are lock.  Dev of this ICO used the money for their project operation and promises that the bounty hunters can have their token unlock once the exchange is available but later has to change to token to another name. I really cannot understand until now why such successful ICO cannot unlock their token for bounty hunters who advertised ICO to reach softcap.

[Psynthax]

Because they know they'll get away with it. Developers care little that someone has spent a lot of time on their favorite product. They are ready to save on everything and everyone. So far, there are no regulators that would protect the rights of the bounty. I only hope that such projects will not live long. Bad always comes back and greed sometimes very quickly finished with the team. A good team with a good project usually pays for the work of the bounty. I hope that the old days will return and we still earn our

Only reason why they are getting away is because there are not enough complains for not receiving payouts.    In one regular bounty campaign there are more than thousand hunters I think if all these people start not only complaining but spread word that they were scammed, these projects will lose their costumers in short time and it will be in their best interest to send payments then.

Sometimes some project just get away with such thing tho, but legit project I'll trust that they are really paying and have the intention to.
Unlike those scammy project even if there's millions of complain they would just keep their mouth silent because that's their intention from the very beginning.

[Dexion]

this is the reality of the current bounty conditions, in my opinion the bad market is their main reason, some projects decided to lock a  tokens for a long time, some projects decided to reduce allocations, some projects decided to extend bounty time, and others.

2018 is a very bad year for the bounty world.

[ipsec]

Bounty Hunters themselves to blame in this. They use automated programs to perform tasks, they spam on the forum. When altcoin comes to the exchange listing they are collapsing in price. None of the developers is not profitable. Therefore, they delay the timing of the award participants.

[posi]

Bounty Hunters themselves to blame in this. They use automated programs to perform tasks, they spam on the forum. When altcoin comes to the exchange listing they are collapsing in price. None of the developers is not profitable. Therefore, they delay the timing of the award participants.

Yes, bounty hunters are to be blame in the part of spamming the forum but not all bounty hunters are into such thing but I dont see any reason why bounty hunters are to be responsible for the price collapsing of a project when the maximum total token allocated for all bounty hunters are just 8% over all token. Besides, I only see the new project miners as the reason for the price collapsing.

[Omela44]

Sometimes i feel that dev team does not intend to pay the bountie anyway. They promise a lot and give little or nothing. Even projects that have reached their hardcap do not pay for the bountie that led to success.

[BADBITCH]

Sometimes i feel that dev team does not intend to pay the bountie anyway. They promise a lot and give little or nothing. Even projects that have reached their hardcap do not pay for the bountie that led to success.

You are definitely right about bounty managers, the good thing is, it is not every manager that has such attitudes, so you can just avoid such platform ok.
Very soon, there will be a move to appreciate bounty hunters, and even though it seems impossible to do, it will happen

and projects, will begin to acknowledge our efforts.

[suzanne5223]

don't join in their ICO if you don't like their rules and if that can change anytime then no investors in ICO of course that will turn not good then the bounty hunters in that will also experience that even they promote for so long that ICO i think this is one of the reason why they can't pay then for me if you going to create new here in crypto i think trading site and gambling site are the recommended to do or to run here in crypto so join in this kind of ICO,Moreover if they launch a new coins/tokens here better to think if this will turn very useful so that's will go popular so join in that

I support what you said but it seems like most bounty hunters only just want to join an ICO earn some $ but they ignore the most important part of going through the bounty terms and condition/ rules and regulations before joining because out of all the bounties posted on here only few are qualified.

[Shatterlean22]

Excuses me please ,what about projects with no ICO? Funds Here and there , won't projects become successful without funds? I believe that any project that doesn't pay bounty hunters due to market price or soft cap issue are just bad projects

[bawa_23]

It all depends on the height of Soft cap & Hard cap reached of the project. Developers will not Pay from their own pocket.