How dangerous is it to write the truth?

[Qcrypto]

The market works in a funny way. Paid ratings and reviews are widely accepted and do not hurt anyone but the naive investors. They are often written by the projects themselves to make them look good. After all, that is the purpose of marketing and promotion.

What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?


This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.

https://crypto-potential.com/report/1


How would you feel about this as an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?

[asriloni]

The market works in a funny way. Paid ratings and reviews are widely accepted and do not hurt anyone but the naive investors. There are often written by the projects themselves to make them look good. After all, that is the purpose of marketing and promotion.

What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?


This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.

https://crypto-potential.com/report/1


How would you feel about this and an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?

that's not something new for me, I have seen so many times the ico that create their own reviews. There was a case that even worst than it just like when you are seeing the ico that claimed has already raised million dollars but they doesn't wanna show the evidence just like the smartcontract address or bank account if this project received funds from the private investors.

[bayu7adi]

if all truth is upheld, then the world of cryptocurrency leaves only quality people in the seriousness of building a cryptocurrency
there will be no scammer who dares to oppose the strength of the cryptocurrency community
but all that is very difficult to create, because we know, that money can cause loss of trust between each other

[Qcrypto]

if all truth is upheld, then the world of cryptocurrency leaves only quality people in the seriousness of building a cryptocurrency
there will be no scammer who dares to oppose the strength of the cryptocurrency community
but all that is very difficult to create, because we know, that money can cause loss of trust between each other

Ain't that the truth.

Smart money exists because of the dumb money.

[marshalljp]

The market works in a funny way. Paid ratings and reviews are widely accepted and do not hurt anyone but the naive investors. They are often written by the projects themselves to make them look good. After all, that is the purpose of marketing and promotion.

What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?


This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.

https://crypto-potential.com/report/1


How would you feel about this as an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?

I for one say the truth will set you free. Transparency is best though there could be business reasons as to why one would limit the data flow. So... perhaps dangerous for the project but best over all for the users.

[Zixy]

The market works in a funny way. Paid ratings and reviews are widely accepted and do not hurt anyone but the naive investors. They are often written by the projects themselves to make them look good. After all, that is the purpose of marketing and promotion.

What would happen if you were to bring out the truth and say it like it is? How dangerous is it?
It the truth befits investors and destroys the projects, would that cause a balance?


This example of an ICO report shows the truthful facts which go beyond official documentation.

https://crypto-potential.com/report/1


How would you feel about this as an Investor and as an ICO that was just evaluated?

It is dangerous if you're writing a truth about a big company. You can destroy their business and they won't be happy about it.

That report is hardcore. I wouldn't mind having this type of information at my disposal. There are so many scams going on in the crypto right now, this might be a breath of fresh air.
As an investor I would like to know the sources which the information came from (links, screenshots, audio), something to prove the credibility of information.
If this was my ICO being evaluated, if I'm not a scam, there is nothing for me to fear and I would take those facts and points on which to improve my ICO.

[Tarion]

I do not know how dangerous it is, but everybody understands, that you can buy ratings on the rating websites, you can buy bounty hunters, you can buy yourself a community and even more. Just be more selective and try to avoid scammers.

[SaoAccel]

Well everything has it's price even trust ratings from ICO listing sites which can easily bought if you have the cash that suffice the amount they want. This scenario is already common here in the crypto currency market, already seen many ICOs that has many good ratings but still fail. This is why I would rather do my own research rather than trusting them.

[IVEXO]

Well
Inthe world today nothing is free and for every existing Website ; their aim is to make money
Which has led to receiving payment for listing , even exchanges get paid for listing
Everything is paid for from creation of token to website creation whitepaper publishing

Just be smart and strong
Know when to walk in and when to walk out of every trade

[patz22]

That's how it works bud not just in this industry you can also see this in any kind of business. There are flaws in any project but you have to look on the brighter side on how it will benefit us(investors) but of course if the project is just a show without having the exact product it should not be tolerated and we should bring the truth so that no one will lose their money.

[Qcrypto]

Well everything has it's price even trust ratings from ICO listing sites which can easily bought if you have the cash that suffice the amount they want. This scenario is already common here in the crypto currency market, already seen many ICOs that has many good ratings but still fail. This is why I would rather do my own research rather than trusting them.

It is sad that the scenario is common and there are people that accept this as normal. But as always, it's the naive investors who don't know the nature of these projects that always get the shorter end of the stick

[qazgroup]

It is always good to see and read reviews and information from as many prospects and angles as possible, regarding each project that you are looking to invest, for example if we find a very positive and exciting article about a project we should also look for critical reviews or we can say if we are shown only the pros we should do our research and know about the cons of that project as well to be clear whether to invest or not.

[shark69]

Because those who give ratings do not fully understand whether they really can to guarantee ICO success, they only carry out their services as promotional tools.
People will always believe that. The successful ICO mechanism is not seen by how much the project is included in the ICO rating site, but how they are able to manage their integrity for their supporters.

[10c]

I would support such a website that would make real reviews for new projects and was incorruptible. Maybe even would I like to be in a team of people who would rate ICO. If you will need people in your team than PM to me)

[xuv500]

Regarding what information you are looking for? I feel cryptocurrency is the best invention of human and I guess this is e new world made by crypto for block chain. If you plan and invest then you can see a lot of money in a quick time.

[Galley]

We always and everywhere pay for everything. Everything is sold and bought. If desired, any ICO company can order ratings. In this, we have been convinced more than once. Therefore, it is absolutely not worthwhile to rely on them when choosing an ICO for investment. Focus on your research and experience, it will be much more reliable.

[MonkeySlapFest]

Never ever write the truth it will bite you in the ass quicker than you can pull your pants up after your mum catches you mid yank!

Bad times

[carrigan]

So sad, but I think that what you said is already true. This time, tends to be dangerous to enter in such ICO with only paying attention on the ratings. Not all rating websites make their rating based on the analysis. The best way to avoid this danger is analyzing them by our own research. It will be better. Analyze deeply their project, team, social media, and other elements to avoid such scam projects.

[Qcrypto]

I would support such a website that would make real reviews for new projects and was incorruptible. Maybe even would I like to be in a team of people who would rate ICO. If you will need people in your team than PM to me)

Thanks for the support. I've just PM'd you.

[mihtju]

It has long been no news that developers pay money for a good assessment of their ICO. There are a huge number of such examples. It seems to me that nobody pays attention to the ICO rating for a long time.