All about bounty payments and its effect to the project

[Aryleeto]

Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.

But no one will now pay in eth , the project will simply be at a loss , it is better to pay in tokens as it is profitable for the project , and in General the ico is not in the best spirit

[1715423610]

1715423610

[1715423610]

1715423610

[1715423610]

1715423610

[1715423610]

1715423610

[Gab20]

It is undeniable that bounty hunters dump, but before that, there are some set of people who also dump, but that it is still not clear whether investors or those who partner with the project team are the ones that dump tokens and cause the dump from the beginning.
Therefore, bounty hunters should not be blamed for dumping their tokens, because a good project will not be affected any any dump from them.

[Redemption59]

Though falling price mark can be attributed to a failing project, I do wonder why people mostly blame bounty hunters for dumping while in the real essence, only 1-5% of token distribution is allocated for bounty. Investors dump and bounty hunters also dump when both see price falling. we should consider that 1-5% of token distribution out of 100% is not enough to cause fall in price and to make bounty managers and investors really understand this, project managers should decide to pay in ETH and still observe if they won't see great dumping of tokens. people should refrain from blaming bounty hunters and face the reality.

[Bohdan Rabeha]

I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.

I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it,  price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"

I also believe that the ico is currently not profitable for investment. And at the same time the market has a lot of one-day projects. This means that confidence in such projects has dropped significantly. I also went to bounty hunter. But i don`t want to promote one-day projects. At the same time new projects appear daily and they need to be properly filtered.

To avoid falling prices on exchange, projects need to create a system gradual transfer of tokens for bounty hunters so that they gradually sell these tokens.
But the project itself should be promising and very often communicate with the audience.

[Little Mouse]

It's your wrong thoughts, bounty hunters aren't promised not to sell, in fact, no one is promised. Everyone can do whatever they wish, no bounty hunter is guilty. You are blaming bounty hunters, imagine, no bounty hunters sells, who would dump then, you investors of course and who will be the loser? It's bounty hunters.

[todayin]

the amount of bounty does not exceed 1% of the total amount of coins, in most cases. Even if all the merchant hunters sell tokens, it will not have much impact. if it's a quality item, it will respond quickly, in a few days.

[stefany101]

Bounty payments is necessary to distribute once the bounty campaign has been concluded. Many people blame bounty hunters once the token's price breaks down upon listing, but not all the time bounty hunters are the main reason behind it, remember that most bounty campaigns had only a small amount of allocated reward, mostly behind 5% from the total supply, so for me it affects the price but a little bit only.

[Absolutep]

It is not only bounty hunters that are dumping the price of a coin, private investors are also guilty of that. Paying bounty hunters in eth may not be the solution to the price of coin especially when a project is not solid.

[ancafe]

Bounty payments is necessary to distribute once the bounty campaign has been concluded. Many people blame bounty hunters once the token's price breaks down upon listing, but not all the time bounty hunters are the main reason behind it, remember that most bounty campaigns had only a small amount of allocated reward, mostly behind 5% from the total supply, so for me it affects the price but a little bit only.

in this matter I agree. actually there are many alternatives so that the bounty hunter does not make a dump on a project. it can only be done when bounty hunters are paid using other coin alternatives. well, but, when the bounty hunter sells their assets together, of course there will be a dump. however, it all depends on the developer.

[amonymous]

Yes I think it should be paid btc for every bounty hunter this is one of the best ways in all the ways. Then there will be a lot of benefits for every investor. Because the price of any currency is reduced by a lot of bounty hunter.
However, it is fully observed on the basis of the team development plan.

[trauchot]

Of course, bounty hunters often sell tokens at a low price and because of this the price of this token falls, but investors and the team themselves are also very often involved in it, so if the project is good and will continue to evolve, then in the future the price of this token will increase.

[ssuchy]

Of course, bounty hunters often sell tokens at a low price and because of this the price of this token falls, but investors and the team themselves are also very often involved in it, so if the project is good and will continue to evolve, then in the future the price of this token will increase.

Stop already groundlessly accusing the Bounty Hunters.  When the cryptocurrency market was in a much better condition, then the projects developed quite actively.  At the same time, participants in Bounty companies did not influence the development of these projects.  We should not make baseless accusations.

[Pamadar]

Yes I think it should be paid btc for every bounty hunter this is one of the best ways in all the ways. Then there will be a lot of benefits for every investor. Because the price of any currency is reduced by a lot of bounty hunter.
However, it is fully observed on the basis of the team development plan.

It's still with how the team will carry the project to it's succession, the payment for bounty is also needs to consider but not that big, it won't affect that much if basing with the allocated percentage, be as it may everything will be in the hands of the team if how good they will develop the project.

[Netnox]

Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.

But no one will now pay in eth , the project will simply be at a loss , it is better to pay in tokens as it is profitable for the project , and in General the ico is not in the best spirit

I don't understand this logic. Bounty payments represent around 1% of the total revenue. So you are saying that in case this 1% is paid in ETH or BTC, the project will run in to loss? If that is true, then the project will be a very weak one. I have been arguing for the bounty payments to be made in ETH for a long time. But the ICO promoters are against it, for obvious reasons.

[TKarollah]

Of course, bounty hunters often sell tokens at a low price and because of this the price of this token falls, but investors and the team themselves are also very often involved in it, so if the project is good and will continue to evolve, then in the future the price of this token will increase.

Stop already groundlessly accusing the Bounty Hunters.  When the cryptocurrency market was in a much better condition, then the projects developed quite actively.  At the same time, participants in Bounty companies did not influence the development of these projects.  We should not make baseless accusations.

if the project is indeed good it will not be destroyed just because the bounty hunter sells coins at low prices because the bounty hunter is only a small part of the owner of the token.
after all, if the project is potentially good, the bounty hunter might not sell their coins because they also want a great advantage.

[bitcoin-shark]

yes in all the ico the bounty hunters make a dump of the price of the tokens when they put them on sale on the various dextralized dex immediately after the end of the ico, the ideal would be to pay them in btc or eth, but this implies a cost, an expense, instead paying them with the tokens of the ico the cost is practically zero...

[graffix]

Previously I also had that doubt. But Actually, the amount of token they share with the bounty hunters is a very small amount. so it's not making a big effect on the project. Otherwise, if they gonna pay bounty hunters with Eth or some other alt, they have to do it by collected funds from the token sale. No one gonna does that. I know there were some projects. but not all of the projects willing to do that.  If project got success hunters will have their share, if not they didn't lose anything. Actually, it's ok with their side.

[nikogluttonym]

Hunters will always sell in the minus. Better at least some money than nothing at all. If there is no demand for a coin, do not blame the hunters.

[JuliaJi]

I think that any influence cant be on project from bounty payments, only weak projects loosing it price because of bounty, which is have 1% from all project

[Ultimist]

Often the fall in prices has a negative impact on the project. Investors are losing confidence in him. But this is not the most important indicator of the success of the project. The most attentive investors analyze the project and determine its prospects in order to understand whether their coins have a chance to grow.