All about bounty payments and its effect to the project

[TomArayaSlaya]

Look at it from another perspective and you might find out that is not only hunters that are selling those tokens cheap Sometimes even before they are paid the coin/tokens is already listed and traded on various places thats enough to tell you that hunters are not the only problem The project team sometimes have issues too

[1715459354]

1715459354

[1715459354]

1715459354

[1715459354]

1715459354

[LiquorBan]

In my opinion, although bounty hunters affects project or token`s price but they have only in a small percentage. and totally the one who has a big effect in the decreasing price of the token are the investors who invested because they have a much more bonus upon purchasing in ICO and investors had a more volume than that bounty hunters.

[drumamat]

Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.

But no one will now pay in eth , the project will simply be at a loss , it is better to pay in tokens as it is profitable for the project , and in General the ico is not in the best spirit

I don't understand this logic. Bounty payments represent around 1% of the total revenue. So you are saying that in case this 1% is paid in ETH or BTC, the project will run in to loss? If that is true, then the project will be a very weak one. I have been arguing for the bounty payments to be made in ETH for a long time. But the ICO promoters are against it, for obvious reasons.

That's it that 1% is a drop in the sea!A normal project can redeem this 1% by itself so that investors do not panic.A shitty project will blame all the troubles of the participants of the bounty and not themselves.So always do weak people and weak projects.

[senin]

I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.

I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it,  price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"

Bounty hunters do not so much affect the fall in the price of tokens after transferring them to the stock exchange, as is commonly believed. Of course, they may have a little influence on their price, but their role is not so large compared to the influence of early investors who buy new tokens in the initial stage of an ICO with big discounts, and then immediately sell them on the stock exchange, having virtually double profit in a very short period of time. However, for some reason they always write that bounty hunters are to blame.

[quality.crypto]

Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.

But no one will now pay in eth , the project will simply be at a loss , it is better to pay in tokens as it is profitable for the project , and in General the ico is not in the best spirit

I don't understand this logic. Bounty payments represent around 1% of the total revenue. So you are saying that in case this 1% is paid in ETH or BTC, the project will run in to loss? If that is true, then the project will be a very weak one. I have been arguing for the bounty payments to be made in ETH for a long time. But the ICO promoters are against it, for obvious reasons.

Yes, that is the main reason everyone is waiting for instead of paying tokens to the bounty better pay them in the form of ETH so that it will help the investors to make a decent profit. Even they are very less number of token to the bounty people, so 1% from their raised money.

[cryptowolfsu]

In some cases when the bounty allocation is higher and there is no demand for the token
bounty dumping can really hurt the price. At the same time it is an opportunity for the investors
to buy cheap tokens if they are confident with the project.

[reallester]

Hunters will always sell in the minus. Better at least some money than nothing at all. If there is no demand for a coin, do not blame the hunters.

we have to love our token. just look at future dont't sell it fast when going to market place. look at past when token new begining.

[Serve20]

I don't think bounty hunters selling off their 1 to 5% of the total allocation of a project will have any significant influence on the value of a project. If the project is solid and the team are doing all what's needed of them to do, its value will also grow even with the dumping of bounty tokens.

[Clearstream]

In fact, not all bounty hunters will immediately sell tokens. and the amount of bounty tokens will not exceed 2% of the total amount of coins. its impact is very limited. they pay the hunter with the token of the project. it is good for the circulation of this coin.

[Bagaji]

I don't blame bounty Hunters for selling their tokens as soon as they get paid after the bounty campaign because they are not investors, but I blame the developers who cannot pay for advert in Bitcoin or ethereum because they want free promoters which I believe has its own consequences.

[JeffBrad12]

Of course, bounty hunters often sell tokens at a low price and because of this the price of this token falls, but investors and the team themselves are also very often involved in it, so if the project is good and will continue to evolve, then in the future the price of this token will increase.

Stop already groundlessly accusing the Bounty Hunters.  When the cryptocurrency market was in a much better condition, then the projects developed quite actively.  At the same time, participants in Bounty companies did not influence the development of these projects.  We should not make baseless accusations.

if the project is indeed good it will not be destroyed just because the bounty hunter sells coins at low prices because the bounty hunter is only a small part of the owner of the token.
after all, if the project is potentially good, the bounty hunter might not sell their coins because they also want a great advantage.

A good project can attract a lot of investors and this will create good liquidity and that means a lot of volumes to prevent the dump. Bounty hunters can't be blamed because the project itself will play an important role in its liquidity.

This is about how good that project is.

[Nivelir]

A lot of useful information about bounty hunters and that really use bounty payments. I think that all these bounty does not affect the course of the price in general, of course at the very beginning they can affect, but in general it has no effect.

[SlickMoTwoToe]

I was once an investor had few gains to some ICO/crowdsale but made many losses so I decided to stop participating in ICO instead I do bounties and buy it thru exchanges from bounty hunters dumping it.

I know for a fact that most of you know this situation and are guilty of it,  price tends to tank due to bounty hunters selling their share of tokens for cheap. I think its better to pay hunters in eth or other alts rather than risking the price of their token or coin in that way they could also help their investors and boost confidence to their future and their project. Well for me a falling price is a mark of a failing project "ICO's"

Why always putting blame on bounty hunters when the price was dropping, actually the rewards for bounty hunters was not affect that much because they just giving a bounty hunter a small amount for their hardwork why don't you think that the owner itself sometimes the reason why the price is dropping they have the huge amount or let say they have the bigger allocation for each the member sometimes if the member see the price was profit then they will be taking advantage on it.

[gaj ahmada]

I don't really understand why so many people say that bounty hunters are the main cause of dumps because I think the bounty hunters only get a few tokens, unlike investors or teams, only a few percent, and as you know that such small allocations must be shared with all the bounty hunters who took part in the project while not all of them wanted to sell, there were some who tried to hold the coins, so it was probably a bounty hunter to make the dump smaller, right? because not everything sells, so I will ask you, are you really sure that a dump happened because of a bounty hunter's fault?

[Landak]

Bounty hunter sale their token low price. They sale all time low price their token. It never bring any effect of this project. Payment of bounty hunter of ETH. Its a very good idea.

But no one will now pay in eth , the project will simply be at a loss , it is better to pay in tokens as it is profitable for the project , and in General the ico is not in the best spirit

I don't understand this logic. Bounty payments represent around 1% of the total revenue. So you are saying that in case this 1% is paid in ETH or BTC, the project will run in to loss? If that is true, then the project will be a very weak one. I have been arguing for the bounty payments to be made in ETH for a long time. But the ICO promoters are against it, for obvious reasons.

Basically that project is indeed weak, I agree with you. if that project is very strong, there will be no problem with ETH payments.
if I remember again, there were a number of projects that I joined and was paid with eth and it proved that the project was indeed good. unlike projects that pay with tokens that are mostly scam or have no value.

[whyrqa]

After get paid bounty hunters and token listed exchange many bounty hunters sell their token so crpto is dump and start bear . Crypto market. By participate bounty you will know best ICOs and should do ICOs invest, problem isn't hunters it's big matter of fall cryptocurrency.

[e@symode]

Opinions of people are completely different, some believe that now truly bounty hunters are breaking prices, but I see that this is not the case and it seems to me that all of this is exclusively investors and the overall situation in the market.

[Svarora]

Bounty hunter are getting the coin after their hardwork.so they just want to encargó their money. They just 3 to 5 % of total supply so i dont think they are solely responsible for dumping. But from crypto ecosystem the bounty hunter must be motivated by giving Them in form of usd or btc itself. They feel good And help the project to reach to mass

[Redemption59]

quite rational as well, for example, bounty hunters sell all their tokens immediately after getting a reward and that can have an effect on the price of the token in the market when dumping simultaneously. I agree more if reward is given with eth or other altcoins.

The idea of bounty hunters selling their tokens immediately after getting rewards which affects the pricing on the market is most times false, how can bounty hunters who received just 1-5% of funds allocation dump to affect pricing but I second the fact that bounty hunters should rather be paid in eth or other altcoins which will be a real evidence to note if a project will still dump or not.

[Akoldi_ibk]

Bounty hunter are getting the coin after their hardwork.so they just want to encargó their money. They just 3 to 5 % of total supply so i dont think they are solely responsible for dumping. But from crypto ecosystem the bounty hunter must be motivated by giving Them in form of usd or btc itself. They feel good And help the project to reach to mass

Even out of the 3-5%, we might still have only 1-2% being dumped while the rest are still with the many hunters that decide to hold for better price or just so because they believe in the project. But hunters are to blame for it.