We're starting getting off-topic, someone should make new thread.
good point, but this is still about the impact of distribution of hash power among pools in case of 51% attack
Don't forget about decentralized pool such as
http://p2pool.org/, even though almost no miners use it.
thank you for information.
from website: "P2Pool is based on the same peer-2-peer (P2P) model as Bitcoin".
so, receiving job of a
blockchain from another
sharechain is going to bring transparency in business aspects of internal activities of pools, but I didn't find any difference about preventing a pool from gathering more than 51% power of the entire network. do I understand it right?