Bounty Hunters being trapped

[ujinice]

I have observed that most bounty campaigns nowadays are not complying with their tagret end date. No problem with extend the campaign but man, these projects are now imposing hunters to not remove their signature until the end of the campaign. This prevents participants from leaving the campaign. Poor participants cannot break free from this and to look for other productive campaign. They have no choice but get stuck and post for these companies. Did you have the same experience? or Do you observe the same pattern? please enlighten me.

Following the extension of the the bounty campaign, you must contact the bounty manager and tell him that you want to leave the campaign due to a change in the timing. Never had a problem with it.

[karagun125]

I think we should be patient enough and wait for the right time to remove our signature, just stick to the rules given. We hope every bounty hunter would be given also previledge and benefits of.the bounty campaign he enter.

[Nitori_m]

I think it is part of agreement. After bounty hunters are paid for services based on how the bounty hunter deliver their paid services with out disregarding the guidelines

[itsik78]

I read conditions before applying for any bounty, don't just join for joining sake as long as you are not comfortable wit the conditions, don't participate. Personally whenever I see any bounty campaign that says it continues until end of ICO I simply look away, I detest extensions but it is understandable

Company terms are subject to change at any time. If you joined on one of the conditions that you were satisfied with, then after a month these conditions may be different and with this you can do nothing but obey or leave the project.

[craked5]

well in some extended campaigns they allow to remove signature. One example is Buddy campaign. Bounty campaign was extended for 3 or 4 weeks. Everyone got their stakes.

[oppo070]

I have observed that most bounty campaigns nowadays are not complying with their tagret end date. No problem with extend the campaign but man, these projects are now imposing hunters to not remove their signature until the end of the campaign. This prevents participants from leaving the campaign. Poor participants cannot break free from this and to look for other productive campaign. They have no choice but get stuck and post for these companies. Did you have the same experience? or Do you observe the same pattern? please enlighten me.

I guess not all bounty campaigns are like this. Some others often approve to remove their signature even before the bounty stakes is calculated. Yes, it is really too much when it took a week or two for the signature to be remove but maybe the bounty manager is still not yet finished calculating stakes.

[endut15]

Now this is indeed bad. because many bounty hunters don't get their payments. in my opinion this is indeed a problem. because indeed the bounty itself is very rare to get many benefits for the participants

yes indeed this condition is, and we have to inevitably live it. because this is the risk of bounty hunters. because before going on to become a bounty hunter, we have to know how the consequences will be, and we must face with enthusiasm.

[Evushko]

There was one company that went only 4 weeks and the earnings were wonderful, more, so far, there were no such repetitions !!!!

[bvg96634]

 Is it so bad that they asking bounty hunters to not to remove their signature? Especially if hunter works for one campaign per time?

[Netnox]

I have observed that most bounty campaigns nowadays are not complying with their tagret end date. No problem with extend the campaign but man, these projects are now imposing hunters to not remove their signature until the end of the campaign. This prevents participants from leaving the campaign. Poor participants cannot break free from this and to look for other productive campaign. They have no choice but get stuck and post for these companies. Did you have the same experience? or Do you observe the same pattern? please enlighten me.

Yes... sometimes the bounty manager just extends the campaign duration, without any prior warning. And the worst part is that the bounty pool remains unchanged. So if earlier you were promised $1,000 for 2 months of work, now it is the same amount for 6 months of work. And if you try to leave, then all of your earnings are forfeited.

[heninur]

I have observed that most bounty campaigns nowadays are not complying with their tagret end date. No problem with extend the campaign but man, these projects are now imposing hunters to not remove their signature until the end of the campaign. This prevents participants from leaving the campaign. Poor participants cannot break free from this and to look for other productive campaign. They have no choice but get stuck and post for these companies. Did you have the same experience? or Do you observe the same pattern? please enlighten me.

yes, I've experienced that. I am often trapped in a project and prohibited from releasing signatures, whereas I have the desire to look for other ICO projects, this greatly limits my work so I can't work optimally in crypto, besides that I don't have many accounts.

[Tylev]

Yes, for bounty hunters this is now a big problem. Even, for example, in this campaign, the signature of which I bear, I have been participating since July 28, this is already four months. Now most ICO generosity campaigns last for a very long time, because the market has fallen, investors have lost activity and ICO projects cannot raise the necessary funds. However, even participating in the campaign of generosity ICO for four to five months, we now began to earn a few tens of dollars. This activity has ceased to justify itself.

[iamzill]

Bounty Hunters are trapped into an uncertain situation, where tokens cannot be registered faster in exchange and payments are in a slow position. This is due to the decline in the crypto market condition and there is no significant increase so this is the worst thing for crypto lovers.

[iTradeChips]

As far as my experiences are concerned I too was able to experience such conditions where in the company where I participated with told us not to change signatures until the distribution date which took place 2 months after the end of the campaign. I was so fed up with the experience that I ranted at their telegram page and they messaged me secretly that I can change it as long as I provide them some information like a mini KYC. I was angry but what can we do right?

[anobtc]

Yes, it is all due to the current situation of the market. ICOs do not meet their desired goals, so the Bounty extends or fails to pay the full amount committed.

[garochessoi]

Just Hold, friends

[Maxre]

no one forces you to take part in one of the ICO project bounty.
if you don't like the rules they make you can leave it.
I suggest that before following the bounty you must first read the rules that the bounty manager applies.

[Maheshkumar_Hrangkhawl]

Yes, it is all due to the current situation of the market. ICOs do not meet their desired goals, so the Bounty extends or fails to pay the full amount committed

What about the ICOs that got listed successfully? Many of them are yet to pay the bounty rewards to the campaign participants. Even their attitude is not right. The campaign managers are treating the bounty hunters like beggars.

[fasdorcas]

I have observed that most bounty campaigns nowadays are not complying with their tagret end date. No problem with extend the campaign but man, these projects are now imposing hunters to not remove their signature until the end of the campaign. This prevents participants from leaving the campaign. Poor participants cannot break free from this and to look for other productive campaign. They have no choice but get stuck and post for these companies. Did you have the same experience? or Do you observe the same pattern? please enlighten me.

And the funniest part to it all is that you might just end up doing a single campaign for half a year without getting paid simply because the project could not meet up with its soft cap. Honestly, there is a lot going on with the whole of bounty space right now that pretty much sucks and this is because even the bounty hunters really tend to ridicule themselves with the way they behave at times.

Getting stuck is always an option, and until people start realizing they need to let project team understand they mean a lot to the success of the project before they will start seeing the need to treat bounty participants differently.

[BitDane]

I have observed that most bounty campaigns nowadays are not complying with their tagret end date. No problem with extend the campaign but man, these projects are now imposing hunters to not remove their signature until the end of the campaign. This prevents participants from leaving the campaign. Poor participants cannot break free from this and to look for other productive campaign. They have no choice but get stuck and post for these companies. Did you have the same experience? or Do you observe the same pattern? please enlighten me.

I think what we need is to be very careful in choosing bounties to join. Sometime inevitable things happen because of the bearish situation of the market. Well as for me, it is us who can decide if we will follow the rules but we need to face the consequences of not following it. Prevention is better than cure. We will just wait until the market becomes strong again.