Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 03:35:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Time: Printing money does not lead to hiper-inflation, lower taxes do  (Read 6306 times)
MoonShadow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1007



View Profile
March 28, 2011, 06:32:45 PM
 #21

Tax revenue -- that is, money coming into government treasury -- is largely predicated on economic growth, rather than tax rates.

Lowering tax rates does not necessarily reduce money coming into government.  Raising tax rates does not necessarily increase money coming into government.

Life isn't that simple.  Don't listen to Democrats and Republicans that want to paint you such a simplistic picture.

There is of course the Laffer Curve that suggest there is a point in taxation past which there are diminishing returns. 

Research done, with the Laffer Curve in mind, strongly suggests that the optimal tax rate varies between 10% and 16%, depending on many variables largely outside the control of government regulations.

So after all this time, the old testament 'tithe' rule, which was originally a form of voluntary fundraising for the government (the religion and the government were inseperable), continues to prove itself as the wisest course of action.

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."

- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
1714880109
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714880109

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714880109
Reply with quote  #2

1714880109
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1005


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
March 28, 2011, 06:38:31 PM
 #22

Research done, with the Laffer Curve in mind, strongly suggests that the optimal tax rate varies between 10% and 16%,

Well, the Bible says something about 10% being fair tax.

I guess God (obviously) knows the Laffer curve, and also knows the less taxes, the better life becomes.

benjamindees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 28, 2011, 09:08:36 PM
 #23

This is actually pretty smart.  The Republicans did a good job of selling their base on the idea that Obama 100% ruined the economy before he even took office, even though it was obviously mostly Bush.  There will probably be a certain percentage of liberals who can be easily convinced that the Tea Party is ruining the economy with fiscal responsibility.

Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!