Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 02:35:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Can a country be totally built with Private investments?  (Read 168 times)
Ucy (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 401


View Profile
November 26, 2018, 04:25:02 PM
Merited by suchmoon (4)
 #1

Better still Can a Country be totally developed without government involvement?


Been thinking about this for a while now and found out that roads and railways are some of the few infrastructures that may be quite difficult to build completely by private investors. They will most likely find it difficult to make reasonable profits and recoup their investments.
So I wondered why not just give them lots of free lands on the roads/railways sides as incentives. They could  lease the lands out to all kinds of businesses such as Real estate, hotels, banks, large scale farms, advertisments etc and income generated from this can be used for future repairs, expansion and upgrades of the roads and railways.









Anyone knows any country that has been able to run successfully (100%) on private investments?
And how about the idea of giving parts of the lands to roads and railways investors?


1714660509
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714660509

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714660509
Reply with quote  #2

1714660509
Report to moderator
1714660509
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714660509

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714660509
Reply with quote  #2

1714660509
Report to moderator
1714660509
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714660509

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714660509
Reply with quote  #2

1714660509
Report to moderator
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714660509
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714660509

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714660509
Reply with quote  #2

1714660509
Report to moderator
1714660509
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714660509

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714660509
Reply with quote  #2

1714660509
Report to moderator
1714660509
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714660509

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714660509
Reply with quote  #2

1714660509
Report to moderator
bluefirecorp_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 152


View Profile
November 26, 2018, 04:33:41 PM
 #2

Nah, ancap societies suck.

Pretty much the wealthy individuals become a form of government; and it ends up just being an oligarchy.
Ucy (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2576
Merit: 401


View Profile
November 26, 2018, 04:54:03 PM
 #3

Nah, ancap societies suck.

Pretty much the wealthy individuals become a form of government; and it ends up just being an oligarchy.

No government bro. Could just be automated or small government.

This will do:
the investors, the people, rules and regulations.


Wealthy individuals are feared because of abuse of the law. I guess with with automated system their powers will be checked.
bluefirecorp_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 152


View Profile
November 26, 2018, 04:56:32 PM
 #4

Nah, ancap societies suck.

Pretty much the wealthy individuals become a form of government; and it ends up just being an oligarchy.

No government bro. Could be just automated or small government.

This will do:
the investors, the people, rules and regulations.


Wealthy individuals are feared because of abuse of the law. I guess with with automated system their powers will be checked.


I think you need a history lesson; or at least need to look into the definition of an Plutocracy; because that's exactly what you're describing.
Jet Cash
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2702
Merit: 2456


https://JetCash.com


View Profile WWW
November 26, 2018, 08:58:39 PM
 #5

All countries start with private investments, and then they create governments.
sinkfish
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 1


View Profile
November 29, 2018, 01:50:08 PM
 #6

Better still Can a Country be totally developed without government involvement?


Been thinking about this for a while now and found out that roads and railways are some of the few infrastructures that may be quite difficult to build completely by private investors. They will most likely find it difficult to make reasonable profits and recoup their investments.
So I wondered why not just give them lots of free lands on the roads/railways sides as incentives. They could  lease the lands out to all kinds of businesses such as Real estate, hotels, banks, large scale farms, advertisments etc and income generated from this can be used for future repairs, expansion and upgrades of the roads and railways.









Anyone knows any country that has been able to run successfully (100%) on private investments?
And how about the idea of giving parts of the lands to roads and railways investors?




it can be, eventually they become government.
Eirecoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 101


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
December 01, 2018, 06:36:21 AM
 #7

There is always going to be the need for a state or government to provide money for big projects like dams or scientific labs or projects like the Large Hadron Collider. Since those projects take a lot of resources and almost do not produce a profit in the short term it is preferred that the state or the government provide the resources
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!