[ANN] ✅FST Network🆒 Building a user and developer friendly Blockchain ecosystem

[Arteezy.rtx]

WEBSITE | TWITTER | FACEBOOK  | TELEGRAM | MEDIUM | REDDIT | LINKEDIN | BOUNTY | EMAIL |

[Arteezy.rtx]

Did you miss us live on Asia Tech Podcast ? Don't want to miss the latest trend and latest #Blockchain Use-cases? No worries ! You can watch the whole clip here : https://buff.ly/2Ac0Wcy

Our COO explaining Why @FSTNetworkTW is game changing? - Easy to use module kits for businesses to build their #blockchain applications - Software mining to increase transaction throughput and create a native token environment - Cross chain transaction

[Javi_Anibarro]

What is this actually? did not they already run an ICO a couple of months ago? as far as I know, they are rebranding it from Funders Token to FST.
or this thread is only intended to increase their popularity? or what is going on?

you can check it here :
https://www.coingecko.com/en/ico/funderstoken
or here
https://icoholder.com/en/funderstoken-22532

[FundersToken]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

[LoveCryptoAll]

You wrote. "The FST Network creates a Layer 3 architecture on top of various protocols, complementing the base layer technology with modules." If you want to make your Internet over the existing one, how can this affect the speed, performance?

[royalfestus]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

do we have new slated time for the ICO or you are just making awareness toward the new year. I also believe the market was better then than now, so why do they decide to start at this lowest market in the year

[kotwica666]

Hello,

Where i can find informations about ICO roadmap (I mean start, phases, end..), token details (softcap, hardcap, total supply..) and the most important - where i can find whitepaper in English (i found only in Chinese: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/e34917_342b3a98a1c8464199b2f945767f4ec2.pdf ) ?

[FundersToken]

@LoveCryptoAll : We increased the speed with our software mining technology, which creates a second layer on top of the original protocol to collect, package and compress multiple token transfer into 1 single transaction, this will increase throughput by 200-400 times.

@Javi : If only we knew...hahaha, just kidding. The reason is that we have a much more solid foundation for tech and business which gave us the confidence to do so.

@Kotwica : Here you go , https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/e34917_ae797a698614474fa407c86731b51191.pdf

[bobthegrownup]

Featured in Top ANNs of the week

https://medium.com/talkbitcointalk/top-announcement-threads-dec-7-2018-bd9d3cf5cd54

[generous]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

do we have new slated time for the ICO or you are just making awareness toward the new year. I also believe the market was better then than now, so why do they decide to start at this lowest market in the year

right, market conditions are very influential for the continuity of ongoing projects. maybe it's better to start when the market conditions have improved or are more stable now. I think that will have a positive impact on the project you are working on. but it is already the will of the project and it is scheduled to run now, we can only support it. good luck

[Suke_Teki]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

[scolary23]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

do we have new slated time for the ICO or you are just making awareness toward the new year. I also believe the market was better then than now, so why do they decide to start at this lowest market in the year

right, market conditions are very influential for the continuity of ongoing projects. maybe it's better to start when the market conditions have improved or are more stable now. I think that will have a positive impact on the project you are working on. but it is already the will of the project and it is scheduled to run now, we can only support it. good luck

I do not think that the team should wait for the best time. The fact is that what we see now may last for a long time, and you know it. Therefore, if the team is confident in their strength, and they are determined  to the smooth development of the project, then I think they may well begin now.

[FundersToken]

@scolary23: Yes I agree and unfortunately we learned this valuable lesson in a hard way, we are confident in our tech and team and have decided to roll out after nearly a year of preparation, we will look forward to your support

@suki : What I meant was we "DID" not have an ICO, we were bootstrapping ( using our own money ) from the start

@generous : We will look forward to your continuos support.

[sarfield]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?

[muarip]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some.  

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?

This project should work because if they already have some funds they will not delay the progress of this project until all the coins are stable again. If the project is good then they won't be bothered by the chaotic price of the coin nowadays.

[Mr.Ease]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?

It should be because if they already have some funds they will not delay the progress of this project until all the coins are stable again. If the project is good then they won't be bothered by the chaotic price of the coin nowadays.

What are you guys going on about... It seems like they delayed the ICO for a few months and did some additional branding/awareness since the original planned date.

Pretty sure, any company when raising funds is going to try and get the maximum ammount for development.
After the crypto markets crashed like 70% and fundraising is getting a fraction of what it was earlier in the year.

A few month delay sounds like a pretty reasonable plan to see if a rebound in the markets will happen.

[Texac]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?

It should be because if they already have some funds they will not delay the progress of this project until all the coins are stable again. If the project is good then they won't be bothered by the chaotic price of the coin nowadays.

What are you guys going on about... It seems like they delayed the ICO for a few months and did some additional branding/awareness since the original planned date.

Pretty sure, any company when raising funds is going to try and get the maximum ammount for development.
After the crypto markets crashed like 70% and fundraising is getting a fraction of what it was earlier in the year.

A few month delay sounds like a pretty reasonable plan to see if a rebound in the markets will happen.

I also think that delaying the ICO can play well. Because investors in the low market are afraid to invest. And I think that there will be growth anyway and in the near future.

[Dimosscolorist]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?

It should be because if they already have some funds they will not delay the progress of this project until all the coins are stable again. If the project is good then they won't be bothered by the chaotic price of the coin nowadays.

What are you guys going on about... It seems like they delayed the ICO for a few months and did some additional branding/awareness since the original planned date.

Pretty sure, any company when raising funds is going to try and get the maximum ammount for development.
After the crypto markets crashed like 70% and fundraising is getting a fraction of what it was earlier in the year.

A few month delay sounds like a pretty reasonable plan to see if a rebound in the markets will happen.

I also think that delaying the ICO can play well. Because investors in the low market are afraid to invest. And I think that there will be growth anyway and in the near future.

I wonder where this near future. Yes, investors are not very active in such a market, for obvious reasons. But we cannot know how long this may continue. I hope that the team will be able to find a more or less optimal time to start, soon.

[Notin2]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?

It should be because if they already have some funds they will not delay the progress of this project until all the coins are stable again. If the project is good then they won't be bothered by the chaotic price of the coin nowadays.

What are you guys going on about... It seems like they delayed the ICO for a few months and did some additional branding/awareness since the original planned date.

Pretty sure, any company when raising funds is going to try and get the maximum ammount for development.
After the crypto markets crashed like 70% and fundraising is getting a fraction of what it was earlier in the year.

A few month delay sounds like a pretty reasonable plan to see if a rebound in the markets will happen.

I also think that delaying the ICO can play well. Because investors in the low market are afraid to invest. And I think that there will be growth anyway and in the near future.

I wonder where this near future. Yes, investors are not very active in such a market, for obvious reasons. But we cannot know how long this may continue. I hope that the team will be able to find a more or less optimal time to start, soon.

Am a bit curious why you thunk investors may not be willing to put money on this project?  If you can give a little insight to your reasons might be helpful to fully understand it, it is very hard to tell what project/product will turn out to be profitable because in the end it's one major aspect that most people are interested in.

[muarip]

Dear Javi,

We did not have the ICO, as we realized the market is bad and decided to raise when the market recovers / when we think we are ready.
We have also notified all the ICO rating websites regarding this decision.I guess we have missed some. 

After the decision, we went on to #buidl on our product and have made a huge breakthrough, especially with our software mining solution.

I think you will like what you see  

what do you mean don't have an ICO? Will you run this project with your own funds or have partners / investor who will fund your project?

The market is sluggish but why this is used as an excuse not to do the ICO, each project will certainly think of existing funds and funds raised. If indeed this FST has more funds with a project without ICO, that means the FST and the team have the ability to develop FST coins independently. Is that so?

It should be because if they already have some funds they will not delay the progress of this project until all the coins are stable again. If the project is good then they won't be bothered by the chaotic price of the coin nowadays.

What are you guys going on about... It seems like they delayed the ICO for a few months and did some additional branding/awareness since the original planned date.

Pretty sure, any company when raising funds is going to try and get the maximum ammount for development.
After the crypto markets crashed like 70% and fundraising is getting a fraction of what it was earlier in the year.

A few month delay sounds like a pretty reasonable plan to see if a rebound in the markets will happen.

I also think that delaying the ICO can play well. Because investors in the low market are afraid to invest. And I think that there will be growth anyway and in the near future.

I wonder where this near future. Yes, investors are not very active in such a market, for obvious reasons. But we cannot know how long this may continue. I hope that the team will be able to find a more or less optimal time to start, soon.

If they postpone this project and start when Bitcoin prices rise again or stabilize, then it will be very unclear because if next year the price of Bitcoin goes back down maybe this project will be delayed again in the next few years. Just a picture