0

[B1tUnl0ck3r]

0

[1715571737]

1715571737

[1715571737]

1715571737

[TECSHARE]

China is coming for us anyway, just a matter of time.

[BADecker]

Arm Taiwan by arming all the people, but not the government.

[lrvjvt]

Is Taiwan not armed now?
In fact, Taiwan’s current military strength is very strong and may be stronger than many Southeast Asian countries. So you think Taiwan is not armed?

[tvbcof]

Although I'm not an expert, it seems to me that the Taiwanese are basically freedom-loving people who have nowhere to go but down if they are taken over by the chi-coms (who are in effect the globalist's test-bed.)  Hopefully the Taiwanese will recognize this and put up a good fight...and ultimately prevail and preserve their freedoms and independence.

I would council Taiwan to make certain that they have defensive options which don't involve the United States for two reasons.  1) The United States might be a little more fragile than is commonly thought, and 2) I would expect the U.S. to use Taiwan as a trading chip for China and sell them down the river at a convenient time.

The thing to understand is that the U.S. is basically under control of the Zionists at this time, and the Zionists parasites are making ready to switch hosts.  They are pretty well configured to be integral part of the 'belt and road' system which rides on the back of the mainland Chinese.  (Look who is making their kids learn Mandarin.)  So, in our (the U.S.'s) death throws we'll do mainland China an even bigger solid than we did by transferring our industrial might to them.  Abandoning all of our 'friends' in E and SE Asia will be one part of that I expect.

The idea of arming all citizens more aggressively than they do in order to make an invasion and occupation expensive seems like a good one, although that might induce the chi-coms/globalists to just go ahead and bio-weapon their asses.  To manage this threat I would suggest that Taiwan have an in-kind retaliatory capability (and target the right places.)

Mostly it makes sense to me that the various East and SE Asian countries who are threatened by mainland China band together into a mutual defense pact which 1) specifically labels China as a threat...fairly obviously they are given their claims on the South 'China' sea..., and 2) pointedly does NOT have any reliance or relationship with the United States in particular.  They should jointly develop, share, and control any and all defensive retaliatory capabilities necessary.

[criptix]

Mostly it makes sense to me that the various East and SE Asian countries who are threatened by mainland China band together into a mutual defense pact which 1) specifically labels China as a threat...fairly obviously they are given their claims on the South 'China' sea..., and 2) pointedly does NOT have any reliance or relationship with the United States in particular.  They should jointly develop, share, and control any and all defensive retaliatory capabilities necessary.

I dont think that is possible anymore in view of the chinese military and economic power, additionaly to the fact that russia is on their side.

Imho the US should start something similar like OBOR to bind asia, africa and east europe to the west.

China already has a huge headstart in this regard and needs to be stopped with all might - else the next generation or the generation after will grow up with a global social credit system.

[ATMD]

From my personal experience, the Taiwanese are forward thinkers, peace loving, and their culture is warm and friendly to all foreigners.

[tvbcof]

Imho the US should start something similar like OBOR to bind asia, africa and east europe to the west.

I see it quite the opposite.  While there are some advantages to 'trade' as we all learn in econ 101, I think they are vastly offset from the perspective of the peeps on the ground by international traders sucking all of the value out of the system.  That's 'globalization.'

Most of the various SE Asian nations have plenty of resources of one type or another.  Certainly enough to give their people a decent quality of life if they are not being raped by globalists and the constructs they promote (e.g., corruption, drugs, terrorism, etc.)

I see it as a much more robust solution to be 'distributed'.  Like 'bitcoin' vs. 'petro-dollar'.  Each nation has their own cultures, interests, languages, security prerogatives, etc.  Everyone leaves everyone else alone because the cost of fucking with one's neighbor and stealing their shit is to high.

On top of that, the U.S. in particular has sunk to the depths of depravity as evidenced by many of our actions around our empire.  It would be crazy and suicidal for anyone to 'partner' with us.  Similar for Europe who shows no compunction about joining in some of our most nefarious activities.

China already has a huge headstart in this regard and needs to be stopped with all might - else the next generation or the generation after will grow up with a global social credit system.

Our leaders here in the U.S. are chomping at the bit to implement the same 'social credit score' system.  I find it likely that most of the development work is actually being done here, and China is but a test-bed where the kinks can be worked out.  This because mainland China's totalitarian political system is conducive to forced implementation, and also because the peeps there in China have been brainwashed thoroughly for generations and a lot of them actually welcome the 'solution.'

I doubt that the technocratic 'full take' data gathering on individuals, and the 'social credit score' AI systems that are being rolled out in mainland China would go over so well in Taiwan, but I could be wrong.  I simply don't know a huge amount about the Taiwanese.

[adamuddinadam]

I lived in Taiwan for 2 years and it's a very nice and peaceful Country so I don't think this is needed..