overpopulation. are we being cheated?!

[white WitCheR]

Over the past 200 years, the population has grown by 6 billion, but is it really so? Let's see! Take China, for example, which is one of the first countries in the world in terms of population. According to official data, China is home to almost 1.5 billion people. However, if we sum up, manually, the population of the country's 20 largest cities, it will increase by 250 million. The situation is similar in India. The 20 largest megacities are home to only 75 million people. At the same time, we are confident that only 1.4 billion people live in India. Is it doubtful that more than a billion people live in rural areas?! Let's look at Russia, 8 years ago in 2010, one of the employees of the Moscow Registry office, talked about the falsity of the official statistics of Moscow. Saying it's exaggerated by more than 50 million. The girl gave all the evidence of their allegations, but was fired. The land has a limited amount of resources for which there is competition and many actions are justified. And although there is evidence that our planet can safely withstand and feed 25, not 7 billion people. the myth of overpopulation facilitates deception and justifies poverty in many countries.

[bones261]

You are not taking into consideration the people that live in cities, but not the "top 20" cities. I live in the Denver Metropolitan area. The area is rated 21st in population in US. With well over 2 million people, I would hardly consider this a "rural" area.

[mocker001]

So what are you saying? who is lying to us? the UN? The IMF?

[Dig Bicks]

Don't worry Gates and Buffet will be bringing their deadly vaccines to a large portion of the population.  We also have 5g network coming that will have us dropping like flies.

[BADecker]

If you include seasteading, along with pollution clean-up, we are looking at a world that can handle 100 billion.

[goldreset]

When the world hit 10 billion, you will have a legit problem. Food. Where will the food come from?

Pollution cleanup will not help with the food supply.

Because of all these, i am beginning to believe 500million is all the earth need. Just like what was written on the Stone in Georgia.

If you include seasteading, along with pollution clean-up, we are looking at a world that can handle 100 billion.

[BADecker]

When the world hit 10 billion, you will have a legit problem. Food. Where will the food come from?

Pollution cleanup will not help with the food supply.

Because of all these, i am beginning to believe 500million is all the earth need. Just like what was written on the Stone in Georgia.

If you include seasteading, along with pollution clean-up, we are looking at a world that can handle 100 billion.

You can grow all your own food in your apartment using modern techniques. We don't really need farmland. The oceans can be made to grow more than enough food to feed 100 billion. We have the technology to build apartments many levels down as well as many levels up. Living on the oceans and making submersed apartments on floating islands, makes it so that we could actually go far beyond 100 billion. And that is without the global warming it would take to grow more plants and open up Northern Canada, Siberia, Antarctica, the Sahara and other deserts, for habitation and farmland.

[goldreset]

That is assuming the entire 100 billion do not consume meat?

You can grow all your own food in your apartment using modern techniques. We don't really need farmland.

Oh well...

And that is without the global warming

[white WitCheR]

When the world hit 10 billion, you will have a legit problem. Food. Where will the food come from?

Pollution cleanup will not help with the food supply.

Because of all these, i am beginning to believe 500million is all the earth need. Just like what was written on the Stone in Georgia.

If you include seasteading, along with pollution clean-up, we are looking at a world that can handle 100 billion.

You can grow all your own food in your apartment using modern techniques. We don't really need farmland. The oceans can be made to grow more than enough food to feed 100 billion. We have the technology to build apartments many levels down as well as many levels up. Living on the oceans and making submersed apartments on floating islands, makes it so that we could actually go far beyond 100 billion. And that is without the global warming it would take to grow more plants and open up Northern Canada, Siberia, Antarctica, the Sahara and other deserts, for habitation and farmland.

If you take into account the warming, it is not exactly a positive impact on living conditions. With the complete thawing of glaciers, the level of the world ocean will increase by 60 meters, which will mark the coastal zone of the continents. The amount of fresh water in the world will also decrease significantly. The number of natural disasters will increase significantly. Hurricanes, typhoons and tornadoes will take thousands of lives, which will complicate the construction of buildings on the water mirror.

[white WitCheR]

You are not taking into consideration the people that live in cities, but not the "top 20" cities. I live in the Denver Metropolitan area. The area is rated 21st in population in US. With well over 2 million people, I would hardly consider this a "rural" area.

I did a recount, taking into account the 123 largest cities by population of China, given even the population of the suburbs, about to reach 450 million

[ATMD]

Yes, it is amazing how population has grew, will we be able to develop the technology to feed the world and eliminate world hunger.

[KingScorpio]

Over the past 200 years, the population has grown by 6 billion, but is it really so? Let's see! Take China, for example, which is one of the first countries in the world in terms of population. According to official data, China is home to almost 1.5 billion people. However, if we sum up, manually, the population of the country's 20 largest cities, it will increase by 250 million. The situation is similar in India. The 20 largest megacities are home to only 75 million people. At the same time, we are confident that only 1.4 billion people live in India. Is it doubtful that more than a billion people live in rural areas?! Let's look at Russia, 8 years ago in 2010, one of the employees of the Moscow Registry office, talked about the falsity of the official statistics of Moscow. Saying it's exaggerated by more than 50 million. The girl gave all the evidence of their allegations, but was fired. The land has a limited amount of resources for which there is competition and many actions are justified. And although there is evidence that our planet can safely withstand and feed 25, not 7 billion people. the myth of overpopulation facilitates deception and justifies poverty in many countries.

i also thought a long time overpopulation is an issue, but it,s not its only a failure to incorporate population into a world they seek to have.

except the antihumanist people (beastialials, and satanists) these can't be integrated without issues.

[criza]

Population statistics have been presented to us without us doubting it or questioning it because we think that this matter are the things that have no reason to be falsify. However, having this question in this forum triggers the mind of everyone who reads it as we think of the reasons why population data are being falsified, if it is really falsify. I think that the government use this strategy for them to wmbbed this idea within us so that we should pracrive the value of saving and preserving our natural resources and other resources. On the other hand, one reason why the government falsify those data is becuase they wanted to hold what was for us in line with their personal interest. They can use it as an excuse for the scarcity and shortage.

[SCheek]

So what are you saying? who is lying to us? the UN? The IMF?

And more importantly why would they?

[KingScorpio]

dont break your mind with overpopulation,

the problem is spiritual and socioeconomic

i am serious, i thought about that issue quite a while