A Selfish Noob Campaign Manager

[Patatas]

Just came across this newly created signature campaign: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5085298.0

The campaign manager Registered on the Forum Today at 06:49:16 AM (Most likely an alt of an existing member)

What caught my attention is the terms of the campaign and conditions

1] I am not representing edgeless.io and running this campaign as they hire me.
2] No funds are under escrow for this campaign. Please understand this and enroll on your responsibility.

The question is: Why would you accept running a campaign when you know that the campaign participants might not get paid? And he obviously will! Knowing this and not risking his own account, he created an alt to run this campaign.

Tag his ass and the company he represents https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1718384.0

[vivavivu]

Have you any proof against the company (Topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1718384.0)?
Have you any proof against the main account according to you (martismartis)?

There is no proof this account (effnt.mngr) is representing Edgeless EDG Platform or the main account as you think martismartis.
If you have proof please post. I have not got any proof. Anyone can create a new account and told that is you or Theymous, think yourself.

[playboy654]

I am not sure he is going to get red tag for running this campaign,but the one who want join in this campaign need to understand that campaign is not escrowed so better to avoid at any cost will save their effort.Signature campaign scarcity made forum members to join any campaigns in these days.

[mdayonliner]

The campaign manager Registered on the Forum Today at 06:49:16 AM (Most likely an alt of an existing member)

Are you complaining for it (if it is an ALT)?

1] I am not representing edgeless.io and running this campaign as they hire me.
2] No funds are under escrow for this campaign. Please understand this and enroll on your responsibility.

Let the participants calculate their risks. I guess on this forum we are adult enough to make decision for us.

The question is: Why would you accept running a campaign when you know that the campaign participants might not get paid? And he obviously will! Knowing this and not risking his own account, he created an alt to run this campaign.

Again let the participants to decide.

You guys are making this forum a hell for the newbies. You don't have any right to justify anyone before committing any crime. What makes you too superior here. Bitcoin were create snitch power from the superiors.

Tag his ass

You can not prove yet that the participants were not going to paid. You are just assuming. What if you are wrong?

and the company he represents https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1718384.0

Is there anything wrong with this company? I hope it does (use some evidence before making a claim).

Funny that the topic is locked by the way so no one can actually join the campaign.

[vivavivu]

lol what the fuck I didn't even mention that account martismartis. Now YOU should tell me why do you think that alt account could be martismartis?

You have mentioned on your post that the poster used alter account. So, whom the alter accounts represent you/me/theymous or someone else?
Base on your post it should be the poster of the main thread.

[coinlocket$]

Most likely a scam

[Lauda]

I've complained about this possibly happening once people started tagging "legitimate" managers for externalities that are out of their control. Just tag it.