am I wrong ???

[aseemhamza]

Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down

When I started to think with myself a little  ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only

This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC

So... am i wrong ?

[khaled0111]

Beside the fact that this is the project's team problem and shouldn't be discussed here, your suggestion is not going to solve anything.
It would be easier to lock the coins or paying bounty participant in BTC or Eth.

[zabir.brutov]

Why do the teams do not pay bounty hunters not with their tokens. It would solve all the problems, because there would be no price dump. But they do not want to send hunters tokens with the real value.

[butka]

First of all, the price dump part due to bounty hunters is usually not so large. The bounty funds are usually very small, a couple of percent of the total token distribution at most. Could bounty hunters still drive the price down? Sure, for example if all bounty hunters went to the exchange to swap their tokens in a couple of days.

There is an elegant solution to this problem, where the developers decide to release the bounty rewards in stages, so the impact on the market is minimized.

A much bigger problems is when big token holders (for example, team members of questionable projects or altcoins) decide to dump their coins during an exit scam. This effectively annihilates the token. No need to worry though if the project is solid and has some solid foundation behind.

[necromastery]

Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down

The such thing is only an invitation to hold that token, not a prohibition. After receiving a payment in the form of a token by a campaign, the decision to sell or not is fully our right. It can't be stopped by the developer though and cannot be forced. Price fall or rise up not entirely the influence of the bounty hunter.

[qualitywork]

Its better to sell the tokens once after listing in the exchange, why I am saying this is there were a lot of genuine bounty projects but these days its completely opposite. A lot of them are scammer's one of my friend worked for a bounty project for 4 months and he even got the tokens he was waiting to sell once it get listed but now the project is not even in the website. He was very disappointed and he was advising us to be careful.

[wanted sliter]

you're not wrong!
Prices are moving every minutes, and they all doing that just to sell the token before anyone could touch the exchanges.

[SportbetMaster]

yes completely wrong; the part reserved for the bounty doesn't exceed 2% of token sold and most of the ico pays bounty 4 weeks at least after the ico end.
So if there is a condition to add to the ICO is to freez the part reserved for the ICO team (~ 10%) and  reserve part of the money rised during ico to pump the token in case of suddent dump.

[LeetPoolsOP]

such a condition will not be performed by any smart bounty hunter. maybe someone holds the tokens in his wallet, but as for me it is better immediately transfer them to the exchange and place orders.

[nutriagrigia]

the condition of holding 20 tokens from the ended projects is something strange. First of all how to be new people in bounty campaigns? secondly, those who already take part in the bounty, they do not hold tokens in such a market, but immediately selling them

[kingzpro]

The ico projects do not seem to hear to bounty hunters suggestions especially after the campaign is over. What i have felt is that most icos have intentionally put on hold the bounty rewards, some have locked the tokens and some are not listing on exchange. I think all these things are being done due to the fear of massive dump considering the massive bears in the market but then again this is not the way out and bounty hunters should get their reward for the work they have put in as soon as possible.

[cryptobae10]

Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down

When I started to think with myself a little  ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only

This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC

So... am i wrong ?

Well one fact no developer or bounty manager seems not to understand is that
Kyc does not stop multiple accounts

It cannot stop it, even developers and team members want to dump the tokens they got as shele
So who are bounty managers not to dump ??

[lllaqpt]

I think the developers themselves are afraid for their tokens, which are now being thrown off by huge amounts, even instead of tokens, they are proposing to introduce stocks, checking every investor. So you can understand them here too, but basically we are always left with nothing.

[tuanytcc]

Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down

When I started to think with myself a little  ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only

This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC

So... am i wrong ?

Yep, what you said have some unreasonable things. If the above conditions are met, I think amount of participants will also not be much and that is not what projects want

[vhns222]

I dont think main problem is with bounty hunters but with early investors ,before main ICO i mean mean pre ico or even close sails so they have big discounts.

[BitcoinHodler]

that is a terrible idea and it will not change anything at all.
it is terrible because you are forcing people to hold your coin whereas you should have tried making them see the potential of the coin and choose to hold on their own. in other words if a project does that, then the developers are admitting that their coin is a shitcoin that nobody is going to hold unless they are forced to do so.

it is not going to change anything because it is not just the bounty hunters that dump a coin! it is everyone else. and you can't force everyone else to hold! they will dump. not to mention that when that date comes, the bounty hunters will also dump so you are just delaying the inevitable.

[Cianix]

I think the developers themselves are afraid for their tokens, which are now being thrown off by huge amounts, even instead of tokens, they are proposing to introduce stocks, checking every investor. So you can understand them here too, but basically we are always left with nothing.

Especially in this market, it is possible to earn a little bounty hunters, I think if you're lucky the prices will rise only when there is a bullish bitcoin market!

[Fumzy]

Always after the bounty campaign ends, the developers of the projects talking to hunters about storing the tokens and not going to sell it so that the price does not fall down

When I started to think with myself a little  ... I asked what would guarantee the survival of the tokens with who would participate in the bounty campaign???
I found that if they add a condition specified in the terms of the bounty campaign that the participant must have at least 20 different types of tokens got it Of the previous campaigns in the past period of not less than 6 months transactions and they must check that on address ( MEW ) so you will find that it will participate Holders only

This condition will stop too ... anyone who tries to register with
different accounts ( altact ) and end up with ways of confirming by KYC

So... am i wrong ?

You are quite right it could reduce the use of multiple accounts to an extent and therefore curb the need for KYC hence protecting participants data. There should not be any big criteria for bounty hunters afterall hunters are the ones helping to promote the project. They get their job done, get paid and walk away. Locking up of token should be for investors or if it must be for everyone then it should be first announced on the bounty page so that hunters can have a choice whether to participate or not.

[nonik]

why do you have to choose bounty with terms that in my opinion are a bit too difficult, especially with the bounty that requires this KYC not to promise that some of my follow-up results are empty, because of some of the bitter experiences I have gone through, I am more selectively participating in bounty campaigns based on those the first time was the Bounty Manager, because this is where we know the project that will be launched has a future or not, especially with the many bounties that fail / scam, of course the BMs have implemented a separate system from the way they work because their first name will be harmed as BM if the project is a scam.

[rosepetals]

such a condition will not be performed by any smart bounty hunter. maybe someone holds the tokens in his wallet, but as for me it is better immediately transfer them to the exchange and place orders.

I agree with you mate,i also take part on placing orders as soon as they can still be traded with value.There are really people who wanted  to profit as-   payments of being  bounty hundred.