The more there is limit on bounties the fewer the dumper

[Callanta787]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

[mummybtc]

I am in support of your first point you highlighted, it is better the campaign managers cap the numbers of people needed for their campaign, this will allow them to pick the best people for their campaigns, and this act will definite improve post quality and discussion on this forum. The issue of dumping is subjective, it is true some people dump their tokens on the market but most is because I need money and some because they were able to register more than one accounts and some people up to 10 accounts and have nothing to lose selling at ridiculous prices

[batang_bitcoin]

1) they don't care on the limitation of participants. For real, they need it for the exposure of their project.
2) I can't understand it but many ICOs don't finish their project because of lack of budgeting and support to the project.

[zupdawg]

1. the fewer the bounty participants, the promotion for the project will be limited resulting to low results

2. related to the answer to number 1, bounties will help promoting the project and more people/investors will likely to help the project

[BADBITCH]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

The truth is none of your options can work with crypto currency bounties because you do not understand the basic function of bounty program.

THere  is a need for high volume of participants in bounty programs to enhance the global coverage of the project on all social media platforms and its entity.
Secondly, how can a project make sales on icos when there are no publicity ??

Basic solution is to increase the number and levl of tokens offered to bounty programs, that would give them value for work done, because bounty hunters dump when they end up receiving 100, 200, 50, 30 tokens

[syypro]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

Perhaps you are right, but what is the point of doing bounty? If the reward is paid to you within a year or two. Or do not pay at all. The project will not develop. I don't think bounty will dump project tokens much. The percentage is too small compared to the total number of tokens. It usually ranges from 2 to 5%

[Bharathi13]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

I support your both the points but bounty hunters are not the dumper for your kind information, check projects like HYPERQUANT (https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/hyperquant/) & there were so many projects which distributed bounty rewards after 1 to 3 months listing on the exchange & their values were almost 80% down. Bounty Hunters are always deceived by the projects as they get late rewards & blame for dumping which have been proven with the recent projects that investors too dump the coins/tokens on exchange. Also the total allocation for bounty campaign ranges between 0.5% to 5% which I feel doesn't affect the project.

[shad_ow90]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

You should know one thing that amount of coins that projects use for bounty campaign is just about 3-5% total coins supply in market and it is not really affect so much. In contrast, benefits that campaigns bring to projects is so much

[Andruha1993]

I completely agree with your opinion. This would be very good if the campaigns did limit the participants. Then the bounty hunters would get more rewards and the ICO price would not go down.

[plr]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

I will only comment on number two of they will not allow bounty, then the ICO will not likely succeed, in the first place this is why they launch a bounty campaign, to reach as many people and investors what we mean is awareness, very very few ICO succeed without bounty hunters.

[qomariah95]

For the first point it actually really agrees, Maybe with that applied, surely bounty participants will get a lot of payments as well as what they do. But if limiting the number of participants to a certain ICO project will not be spread out to everyone. So if limiting is what will happen.

[libert19]

Agree with first point and to add, they should list there token on good exchange where liquidity is enough, so some sellers don't bring the prices down.

[Indrawan77]

It makes sense, most of the time now the bounty hunters only joined to sell after the coin hit thr market, but the developers supposed to be already allocated the fund for promotion, I think the one that contribute to the drop is the investors that target the bonus coin during the pre ICO and then will sell after the coin hit the market, I think the developers can limit the distribution per day to prevent huge dropping

[Patrix_1]

You cannot blame bounty hunters for the token dump. If the team is not doing enough marketing and do not make a bounty lock up until the third exchange, this is their fault, because they have the main responsibility for the token price and not the bounty participants.

[demenBTC]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

I think the bounty hunter is never a dumper coin, and the problem of reducing participants has no effect on the price of tokens on the market, if you see how many bounty hunters can be allocated only 1% of the allocation made from ico then you don't think so

[KuyaBreezy]

In reality, you are only attacking one symptom, not the disease, the problem is that the market is really low and nobody wants to risk that in two days their investments are worth nothing, it is rare that the only campaigns that have problems with dumpers are coins that in a year halt their development.

[harapan]

I disagree, the more participants, the faster the project spreads. it will invite investors to come.
and besides, the allocation of funds for bounty campaign participants is only between 2 - 3% of the total supply. and that does not contribute to the coin dump on the market at all.

[Galantin]

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

Maybe that's enough. Maybe enough already humiliate hunters? the hunter gets 1-5% of the total volume. You understand this amount is not able to bring down the price of a coin. Let the projects change their investment policy. Together with the bonus program which often amounts to + 50% of coins, let them significantly increase prices in stages.


You constantly blame the hunters. Only the problem is not in us but in companies that do not fulfill their conditions.

[kaito.]

mostly bounty pool reward was fixed so it didn't matter how many people will join bounty program it will the same, to prevent bounty hunter dump the coin at market DEV should buy back the coin at public ico price.
as for the bounty after ICO finished that's imposible, DEV team wouldn't want to promote project that already have many investor. bounty hunter job was to promote ICO project to get investor aware of it's project and invest in it.

[jackflag]

What is the difference how many people participate in the project? The number of coins that they will receive will always be the same, it does not matter if the entire pool is received by 300 or 3000 people. What prevents these 300 people from selling 100% of their awards at once?