Ico fund raising

[slashz9]

in my opinion yes the more money collected, the more opportunities that can be achieved, but sometimes it is also wrong if done by a bad team and an unclear roadmap.

[Sab11]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

Absulotely yes, project with high amount of ico raised is mostly is a successful project because we all known that with high fund, project can support it self road to success, i dont think that satoshi nakamoto do a fund raised, but vitalik does base on my research hehe.

[Lazada]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

The more funds collected in a project, the greater the success of the project will be. When more funds are collected, it will make it easier for the project team to realize and implement the project they have. There are many references, funding needs are usually used to support various programs. and for projects that do not reach the target fund, they will usually have difficulty implementing the project they have.

[tsaroz]

one on one,

Yes. The project have an estimate of fund raised and things they'll utilize it for. A less funded project would struggle from completing tasks and can't achieve the desired scale.

Yes. Startup projects are the projects that starts up with scratch. Unlike an established company, a startup would require a fund raising whether in be from an individual, private raising, getting funded by a company for stakes or a crowd funding.

Don't know and Yes. It was experimental in case of Satoshi, and as we don't know who that really is, we also don't know whether he was funded by someone in his project. Vitalik's Ethereum on the other hand was one among the early fund raising crypto.

[Saugani]

we know thinking like that.

all projects based on the blockchain will have to ICOs but it’s there crowdfunding public or private, depending on management of the developer. it’s the same thing as ICOs and IPOs have fundraising.

difference is whether the project was good or not, and some MVP support to an implementation of project each.

[ryap12]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Yes definitely!

Why would a project need to create an ICO? its for fund raising so that's why it needs to raise money.

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Not all, there are start up projects that are standing on their own and proceeds the plan that they have through step by step.

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

ETH does, bitcoin no.

Passwordnow already answered all questions. No need to keep on repeating your answers guys. Anyway, I didnt know ETH used fund raising. I blame myself for not getting involve into cryptocurrency back then. I would have been filthy rich!

[myohmy81]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

If those project has good application to the community then many investors will put money on those ICO but the success will depends on the works of the developers. Many ICO that hit their hardcap but not performing well on their prices on the exchanges it's because some dev have failed to anticipate those market volatility and competition. This is the reason that a good and competent team can make a project successful as more investors will support them on their projects.

[dreico]

by itself, the more the project will raise funds, the more successful it will be and without it projects would hardly exist at all ico

[GatotKaca]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

of course the amount of money in the ICO determines the success of the project. therefore the ICO was made to get an injection of funds so that the project can be developed and succeeded.

not all, because there are also projects that are able to stand alone in carrying out their projects.

if that is why I don't really understand

[khufuking]

1- No, of course not, 90% of projects are asking for more than they gonna use anyway, you will see projects that can be done with literally minimum amount of money and yet they are trying to raise $20million dollars +, I can give you endless examples of this. Most ICOs are asking for way much more than the project is really needs and only a few ICOs are asking for a realistic amount. I can also give you examples of some projects, we are all aware of that raised millions of dollars and where they are now!

2- Nope.

3- It is public information you can just google it.

[siupang2]

No actually the raised money from the ICO not determine the success of the project, management of the raised fund that determine the success. If they spend more money for marketing and less for development they only success for short term...

[hongus]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

To launch a quality project, of course, investments are needed. But projects that work without large investments reach good heights. Since the developers are doing my project on the enthusiasm.

I'll give you an example. Why large investments do not lead to success. The NELUN project is a cryptocurrency bank. They collected $ 136 Million but we will not see the product because it is fraudulent...

[Alisha FR]

the amount of funds collected from the project determines the current ICO project, plus the ICO focal point in certain projects, such as banking, this is very different from Bitcoin triggered by nakamoto, bitcoin does not focus on one particular field, but bitcoin is made in cyberspace . so Nakamoto doesn't have to raise funds.

[spike420211]

I think investment in ICO is one of the most controversial types of investment. You pay money for something not yet ready, and it is not known whether it will work as it should.

[Mikcik]

It is not complete but is one of the factors that makes investors assess whether it is a worthy project for them to invest. For example, an ICO with a hard cap proves to be a good project that many people care about

[aji567]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

Of course that greatly affects the success of the ICO.
I think there is no ICO that does not do fundraising.
Of course both must have big investors.

[ATSgrowth]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

I think that it is very important, it shows how many people believe in the project, how the big project it is and many more. So I think that yes, projects that collect more money are more successful.

[ballerin and giroud]

I think investment in ICO is one of the most controversial types of investment. You pay money for something not yet ready, and it is not known whether it will work as it should.

You can lose money when choosing shitcoin, as well as ICO. There is no safe investment in crypto currency, you need high courage and a high level of trust, but if you don't have that, then this place is not in accordance with the concept of your life.

[JuanPaulo]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

Naturally, the more promising the project is, the more money they are willing to invest in it and the more investment it collects in fact. I think that there is no point in explaining why.

[OneCoinMan]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

No, Satoshi did not conduct any fundraising. Then bitcoin was an interesting thing for geeks (today they have become billionaires, lol). ETH has carried out the first of its kind ICO, but then ... ETH is really a worthwhile project, which cannot be said of thousands of others from 2017.