Ico fund raising

[Korkorjkk]

At times if a project does not raise the required amount needed to start, the project will not become successful.  The money raises as well as other factors such as the team and developers contribute to the success of a project.

[nreal]

A lot of capital mobilization cannot guarantee the development of a project, I see many projects have mobilized tens of millions of dollars, but for a long time not being able to launch products, roadmap always suffers delay.

[GREENch]

In most cases, the success of the project depends on the hard work of the development team. There were cases when having collected a lot of money during the ICO, developers began to lead an idle life, pushing the development of the project into the background.

[AlekseyCrypto]

I don't think that the amount of money is a determining factor in the success of a project. A lot of old projects raised some money, but were able to gather their audience and attract new investors after the launch of the project.

[MoonCrypt]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

the amount sometimes to me is just the team feeling to hyped about there ideas

ICO was meant to be a smart way to get a project to raise money alongside community building but that was affected with greed and unregulated space

[Genrix]

Amount of raised funds no matter something. I just check ratio of collected funds to hard cap, it shows market interest to coin. Generally speaking I prefer low cap coins.

[Prolifik]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

Satoshi not colected any money before he launched Bitcoin.
Vitalik and Ethereum had ICO before they created the Ethereum ecosystem. Also many big projects like IOTA or NEO funded their projects by ICO sale.

[starplaks]

If the project is of high quality and the team plans to complete it, then of course it plays.

[prororo]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

of course yes , developers need funds to pay the salaries of their company employees

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

if no funds can make a project, everyone will have their own project

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

no for satoshi and yes for vitalik

[Nurma.A]

the amount obtained from an ico does not determine the success of the project. investors see the uniqueness of the products or technology they offer. that way, investors can determine whether they want to invest or not.

and does not have to start from raising funds. can use their own funds, and if anyone is interested. the funds that you spend will you get back.

[galya.crip]

In fact, the budget of the fees that the project has set for itself is largely overstated by the actual amount that can help them achieve the goal.

[taguig]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

That is the reason why they are launching an ICO, they need money and they want it to pay for creators of their platform, Satoshi Nakamoto did not launch an ICO and these ICO only started when Vitalik started an ICO.

[bartusv]

Fund raising is important part for the project development. It is needed for the smooth progress of the project
development . Some projects are raising more funds as they need and setting unrealistic goals for soft cap and hard cap.

[Thanasis]

Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??

Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??

Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??

Many projects who raised millions also got failed.

NO need to start the project,ut they also need funds for developing that project.

We don't even know who are them so no one can find it.

[Williams_Leo]

Of course, if you raise more money. Your project will be more successful, and the price of your token will be higher than the ICO price. That is sure to happen. But in 2018 I saw many projects that raised more than $ 30-40 million but they disappeared and scam

[nebuch]

No budget everything is useless.
Project without enough fund raising will end up just an idea. Money gives fuel to create the idea into reality from intangible to tangible. No money no project no product to produce.

[red4slash]

No budget everything is useless.
Project without enough fund raising will end up just an idea. Money gives fuel to create the idea into reality from intangible to tangible. No money no project no product to produce.

because money is an important thing to build an idea because most ideas have a connection with funds that must be held. therefore the capital needed to develop ideas and without capital the idea will die

[spike420211]

If the project is serious and a lot of money has been invested in it, this can guarantee the project a good future as a project, because they have enough money to implement their idea, and even if they make a mistake they can try another way, because it will allow them money. But the success of the token depends on it only indirectly, unfortunately.

[ololajulo]

This are one of the problems we faced in 2017, we forgot that they were all startups and we kept putting fund to projects because of the hype. Now we see the rate most of them failed. 2016 project were still better and 2017 had the highest fund but it could not help to prevent the dump in the subsequent year. I hope we have better valuation in the market this year and beyond. Investors will ask questions nore on the high project valuation out experience. The era of selling a small portion of the stake is now heralding which could also be of concern in coming months

[dumplingsandsushi]

Well, ETH is famous for their ICO.
just do a quick google and you will find all kinds of articles about it.
When ETH was doing their ICO, peopel were yelling SCAM!
It was a new model for startups and people were suspicious.

Now, eth has basically laid down the blueprint for ICO success.
It has generated an entire economy within and economy.

As far as Satoshi goes, I'm not aware of any fundraising that happened.
Part of the mystery and awesomeness of btc is that Satoshi created it all himself.
Because it is such a huge achievement, many believe that satoshi was actually a group of people.
Whatever the case, there was no btc ico, just geeks mining in those early years.