A boycott of replies to the recent extensive trolling by cryptohunter

[The Cryptovator]

Lauda, TMAN and yogg still have negative trust against CH. I also don’t see him complaining about marlboroza, but I also don’t read his posts closely.

Never mind if CH made thread against any specific problem of against any specific people. Even I had not talk with him previously but he have complain against me. Total mathematics is, if you write any constructive post against CH then obviously he will complain against you. So was tried to avoid reply on his thread but sometimes I did. Because even he trolled on my merit source application.

However I think he become mad after got tag and he forgot about apology. Actually he got tag for uninterrupted argument and false claim (IMO). So he is the one who responsible for his tag. You can say CH is just against whole DT members.

[1714106965]

1714106965

[1714106965]

1714106965

[1714106965]

1714106965

[1714106965]

1714106965

[1714106965]

1714106965

[bones261]

You can say CH is just against whole DT members.

    It extends beyond that. He also is against some people who are in the top 200 merit receivers, some merit sources, some staff members who delete  his posts, some who uses the report to moderator function, some who disagrees with his "facts," some who belongs to a signature campaign, some who ever invested in Dash, etc etc etc. Unfortunately, when his sparring partners get sick of being belittled and don't feed him anymore, he always finds someone new to respond to his posts. Quite frankly, the only temporary solution to counter his behavior is to shadow ban him, which I'm sure will never be implemented. If he ends up getting banned, I'm sure we will be treated to a string of alt accounts, ad infinitum.

[suchmoon]

If he ends up getting banned, I'm sure we will be treated to a string of alt accounts, ad infinitum.

AKA "friends" LOL

The only thing you can do now is try to get me banned (real motive because I am telling the truth about you all, which will be evident when this is historically analysed)  and that will actually just provide my friends opportunity to join and crow about my great deeds and your foul deeds in even more strong terms without looking like an egomaniac.

LOL2:

Come debate here BONES261

[bones261]

LOL2:

Come debate here BONES261

Message modified. He "wins."  

[nutildah]

Congratulations, this thread made CH news in what are bound to be 2 lonely meta posts (probably more to come, it looks like a series), because nobody who commented in this thread is allowed to comment in them per local rules. I can guess who's going to be commenting there... There's a few Member-level folks who love to give their input on Meta matters, they will probably be CH's only respondents.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Congratulations, this thread made CH news in what are bound to be 2 lonely meta posts (probably more to come, it looks like a series), because nobody who commented in this thread is allowed to comment in them per local rules. I can guess who's going to be commenting there... There's a few Member-level folks who love to give their input on Meta matters, they will probably be CH's only respondents.

I literally just read those two threads. It’d be really good if nobody responded to either & I’d find it quite funny to imagine him in his parents box room bending himself out of shape, furious about the lack of replies.

I’m sure he’s got walls of text in mind ready to reply to anybody right now.

Hopefully nobody posts in them.

[TheBeardedBaby]

I'm sure he gonna come out with some sock puppet/alt just to continue his wall monologues and keep attracting attention to him (and bumping the threads).
As we have a saying there is no such thing as bad advertising as long as people talk about you. It's sound horrible but it's true. People intentionally make scandals to get their fifteen minutes of fame (even if it's a bad fame)...

[LoyceV]

Congratulations, this thread made CH news in what are bound to be 2 lonely meta posts

I've reported both already. It could have been posted in one topic, and it should (at best) be moved to Reputation. Let's see if Mods agree.

because nobody who commented in this thread is allowed to comment in them per local rules.

That's ironic, coming from the user who made me lock this thread after extensive spamming and breaking my local rules.

I don't think it's specific enough to point at another thread for local rules:

26. Local thread rules, if stated properly when the thread was started, specific enough and don't conflict with the forum rules, have to be followed.

That said, I wouldn't mind a forum-wide "don't reply to ch" rule

[The Sceptical Chymist]

As we have a saying there is no such thing as bad advertising as long as people talk about you.

What the hell is he advertising, though?  Is CH even wearing a signature?  If I were any less lazy and actually had signatures unblocked I would check, but I seem to recall that he wasn't using avatar or sig space to promote anything.  Anyway, I think he's just an attention whore.  You can't seriously keep making the same irrational arguments time and time again with zero support--and it's not like he's just writing short posts, either--and not come off as a big drama queen.

If CH got banned and evaded it with an alt account, I'm fairly sure it'd be easy to detect, assuming he kept writing in a similar style.  His command of English is certainly good enough that he could probably write differently if he chose.  However, I see that he has a compulsion to write extremely long posts and I don't think he would stop doing that.  I don't think he's able to.  He didn't get banned, did he?  Never mind, I just saw that he wrote another rambling screed.

Edit:

Over 1,200 posts in Meta all complaining about the same nonsense.

WOW.  I did not realize he was that prolific.  I've probably made way more than that in Meta but over a much longer period of time.  His posts are all probably in the past few months, and that's a hell of a lot.

[nutildah]

What the hell is he advertising, though?  Is CH even wearing a signature?  If I were any less lazy and actually had signatures unblocked I would check, but I seem to recall that he wasn't using avatar or sig space to promote anything.

For your reference, he's advertising his red trust, or rather how it was left by scumbags.

Anyway, I think he's just an attention whore.

Confirmed. Over 1,200 posts in Meta all complaining about the same nonsense.

If that's not insanity I don't know what is.

[TheBeardedBaby]

As we have a saying there is no such thing as bad advertising as long as people talk about you.

What the hell is he advertising, though?  Is CH even wearing a signature?  If I were any less lazy and actually had signatures unblocked I would check, but I seem to recall that he wasn't using avatar or sig space to promote anything.  Anyway, I think he's just an attention whore.  You can't seriously keep making the same irrational arguments time and time again with zero support--and it's not like he's just writing short posts, either--and not come off as a big drama queen.

If CH got banned and evaded it with an alt account, I'm fairly sure it'd be easy to detect, assuming he kept writing in a similar style.  His command of English is certainly good enough that he could probably write differently if he chose.  However, I see that he has a compulsion to write extremely long posts and I don't think he would stop doing that.  I don't think he's able to.  He didn't get banned, did he?  Never mind, I just saw that he wrote another rambling screed.

It's just a saying and the meaning behind it is that  just to stay in the people' mouth, be popular even if with a bad reputation (you don't need to advertise anything).
In other words something like the Kardashian - famous for being famous.

[suchmoon]

Congratulations, this thread made CH news in what are bound to be 2 lonely meta posts

I've reported both already. It could have been posted in one topic, and it should (at best) be moved to Reputation. Let's see if Mods agree.

There are 3 new threads now and all of them are just extensions of his complaints about his deleted posts. Hopefully he won't be allowed to keep creating threads like that, particularly after he got reprimanded by theymos.

[stompix]

For a moment not seeing the usual name among topics starters and checking his history I thought it's finally over.
But it seems like now there is an invasion of newbies willing to carry his banner and continue his fight against the catcultist and the DT gang 

At least he hasn't been that active on his main account, anybody has a clue why? Temp ban maybe? 



 

[Quickseller]

For a moment not seeing the usual name among topics starters and checking his history I thought it's finally over.
But it seems like now there is an invasion of newbies willing to carry his banner and continue his fight against the catcultist and the DT gang 

At least he hasn't been that active on his main account, anybody has a clue why? Temp ban maybe? 



 

He hasn’t posted in two days but he isn’t permanently banned. I find it fairly unlikely that he got temp banned because he has calmed down somewhat recently in regards to derailing threads and he has made a clear effort to clean up his act in regards to breaking the rules.

I would not write off those people as being CH, I have no idea one way or another. However I am confident that most people are not willing to criticize the status quo out of fear of negative impacts to their reputation. If they act like CH then they are perhaps him, but if they are not then they are probably someone else.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

For a moment not seeing the usual name among topics starters and checking his history I thought it's finally over.
But it seems like now there is an invasion of newbies willing to carry his banner and continue his fight against the catcultist and the DT gang  

At least he hasn't been that active on his main account, anybody has a clue why? Temp ban maybe?  



 

I thought about him today when I saw multiple ‘Newbies’ complaining about how the forum in run in a single thread earlier.

It is strange that he’s not around starting about 3 threads a day saying pretty much the same thing.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Guys, please. This applies to his new alt account as well.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Guys, please. This applies to his new alt account as well.

Finding it hard not to respond to him atm. He’s even made a thread dedicated to me in Reputation & how I’m the worst shitposter on the entire forum & I should be banned

[suchmoon]

Guys, please. This applies to his new alt account as well.

Finding it hard not to respond to him atm. He’s even made a thread dedicated to me in Reputation & how I’m the worst shitposter on the entire forum & I should be banned

That what he does. He finds someone who's still responding to his bullshit and trolls them incessantly. This gives him an excuse to keep posting without breaking spam/multipost rules. He's literally begging you to reply. We've all been there

Please present 10 of your best original thought inspiring posts

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Lesson learnt.

Cutting him off as of NOW!

[LoyceV]

This applies to his new alt account as well.

Sorry, I fell for it