OK, your object is grounded. I admit that perhaps my comment didn't come out right.
What I wanted to say is, high-quality posters of higher rank will surely find their place in better paid campaigns with lower requirements compared to Bitvest and 777coin campaigns.
I think there are pros and cons on both views. I consider myself a high-quality poster, with a merit vs. activity ratio of 2.63 (which means 2.63 merits earned daily on average) and with a merit vs. posts ratio of 0.71 (meaning I received 0.71 merits for each post; or 7 merits for 10 posts).
Besides, with my 1069 merits, I think I'm the user with most earned merits from this campaign (not the user with most merits, but the user with most
earned merits).
Yet, I'm still here. I applied for ChipMixer twice with no luck and once for BestChange with no luck.
For example, a maximum of 60 posts per week is a bit inhumane and often ends up with spamming the forum, imho. I have yet to meet a campaign member who can meet this requirement for weeks without spamming and posting nonsense in mega threads. On the other hand, in other campaigns, quality members can earn the same amount (or more) with a good 20-25 posts per week. Surely you can agree with this? I'm just stating the facts.
Yes, it's hard to have 60 high-quality posts each week and many trying that may end up in spamming. I think I had only 1-2 times 60 posts / week and a few more times 30+ posts / week. In rest, I had 15-30 posts per week. And yes, in other campaigns you can earn same amount with lower posts. But read below - it's an update of my previous post which I made while you were writing you last post so you didn't see it:
Furthermore, don't forget other advantages: this campaign counts your posts on any board, including local boards, Games and rounds, Offtopic, other campaigns' topics, this campaign's topic, even Serious Discussion and Ivory Tower boards, where signatures are not shown! And this an advantage which other campaign's don't offer, as many don't count posts in these boards.
