jonemil24 (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 60
imagine me
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 28, 2018, 01:58:22 PM |
|
Full title: Judge Denies Craig Wright's Motion to Dismiss Billion-Dollar Bitcoin LawsuitOn Dec. 27, court documents from the case against the Nchain chief scientist, Craig Wright, explained a large portion of his recent dismissal motions were found “not warranted” and were denied. Wright is being sued for 1.1 million BTC in a legal case in Florida that alleges he manipulated David Kleiman’s family. Read more: https://news.bitcoin.com/judge-denies-craig-wrights-motion-to-dismiss-billion-dollar-bitcoin-lawsuit/
|
Normally, if given a choice to do something and nothing, I choose to do nothing. But I will do something if it helps someone else to do nothing. I'd work all night if it meant nothing got done. - Roy Swanson
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 28, 2018, 06:46:09 PM |
|
Though I support anything that puts Craigy in legal trouble I really don't get this case. The addresses have been proven to be nothing to do with either of them - https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.htmlHow can someone with zero evidence their relative ever had any ownership of anything sue a pathological liar with an equal lack of evidence to match?
|
|
|
|
squatter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1196
STOP SNITCHIN'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 28, 2018, 09:29:43 PM |
|
Though I support anything that puts Craigy in legal trouble I really don't get this case. The addresses have been proven to be nothing to do with either of them - https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.htmlHow can someone with zero evidence their relative ever had any ownership of anything sue a pathological liar with an equal lack of evidence to match? I'm pretty sure it's based on Craig Wright's previous claims. He claimed to control several addresses (some or all of which were proven to be tied to entities like Mt Gox) and he used them in back-dated contracts that purported to show that Kleiman transferred ownership of coins to Wright. I'm not sure why he did that, but he apparently did. This early in a civil case, I think that's good enough to move forward. I think it would fall apart at trial, though.
|
|
|
|
o0o0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 28, 2018, 09:40:03 PM |
|
I cant wait to see craig tell the judge none of your fucking business and then how he has more money than the judge and all his other abusive attitude problems.
bet he turns into a quiet mouse when faced with someone of higher authority.
such a case might also put to bed his false satoshi claims.
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5292
Merit: 13207
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 01:20:23 AM |
|
Though I support anything that puts Craigy in legal trouble I really don't get this case. The addresses have been proven to be nothing to do with either of them - https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.htmlHow can someone with zero evidence their relative ever had any ownership of anything sue a pathological liar with an equal lack of evidence to match? You can sue anyone for anything. I suppose it's not obvious enough for outright dismissal in this case. I feel bad for the Kleimans. It sounds like CSW tried to use them as a pawn in some larger con, and now they think that they're owed millions of dollars which never existed.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
buwaytress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 3582
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 07:14:22 AM |
|
I cant wait to see craig tell the judge none of your fucking business and then how he has more money than the judge and all his other abusive attitude problems.
bet he turns into a quiet mouse when faced with someone of higher authority.
such a case might also put to bed his false satoshi claims.
Easy money on that bet. Guys like these are loud when there are willing listeners, but afraid to be found out especially outside their comfort zone. If he's as smart as he purports, he'd be representing himself, and then taking defence, not dismissing the lawsuit. Again, I have always been able to respect people, past and present, for their contributions but all this shadiness just seems so out of sync with what they're supposedly all about. Those satoshi claims ain't ever going away either. CW does tend to fool people easily and in this space, people kinda want to be fooled easily. There's demand, and CW has the supply.
|
|
|
|
Kakmakr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1963
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 07:54:11 AM |
|
I would like to see this go to trial, even if it has no merit. The lawyers must ask CW under Oath if he is Satoshi and if he lies, he would be in contempt of court and he can be prosecuted at a later stage. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) People should lodge a lot more cases like this against him to keep him busy in the courts and to drain his funds defending his lies. Then we will hear a lot less about him and his dreams to conquer Bitcoin and to be the supreme ruler. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
BitHodler
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1179
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 01:41:56 PM |
|
bet he turns into a quiet mouse when faced with someone of higher authority.
That's what con artists do, because that's the only time they realize they play a game they can't win by cheating, lying and manipulating. I feel bad for all the genuine minded people working below him. A tyrant he is. such a case might also put to bed his false satoshi claims.
He did it himself already. No one but a few noobs left and right believe he is Satoshi. Also take into consideration that the more people know about something, which he claims is the case, the harder it is to keep a secret. If he was even remotely related to the development of Bitcoin it would have been clear by now. Either way, Satoshi, as disrespectful as it may sound, is a nobody aside from his coins in economical terms. Satoshi isn't perfect. Bitcoin wasn't perfect, and still isn't, but a whole lot more than when it saw the light...
|
BSV is not the real Bcash. Bcash is the real Bcash.
|
|
|
Betwrong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2204
I stand with Ukraine.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 08:35:36 PM |
|
While researching about this case I came across the original Kleiman v. Wright lawsuit which contains the following statement: It is unclear whether Craig, Dave, and/or both created Bitcoin. For reasons not yet completely clear, they chose to keep their involvement in Bitcoin hidden from most of their family and friends. It is undeniable, however, that Craig and Dave were involved in Bitcoin from its inception and that they both accumulated a vast wealth of bitcoins from 2009 through 2013. Sourse: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4388885/Wright-Kleiman-Lawsuit.pdfThe word "undeniable" here is what strikes me the most. And I would like to ask the community, is it really undeniable that they were involved in Bitcoin from its inception or is it just an example of poor wording?
|
BITCOIN TO THE MOON ☾ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 08:49:01 PM Last edit: December 29, 2018, 08:59:51 PM by gentlemand |
|
The word "undeniable" here is what strikes me the most. And I would like to ask the community, is it really undeniable that they were involved in Bitcoin from its inception or is it just an example of poor wording?
That document is put forward by the Kleiman family who have a vested interest in claiming there's some money to mud wrestle over. I've never seen any proof from anyone anywhere. I guess they'll also throw in the Gavin Andresen debacle too. The 'proof' bubbling around somewhere from Craigy was a bunch of Gox addresses.
|
|
|
|
aoluain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1341
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 11:49:35 PM Last edit: December 30, 2018, 12:02:54 AM by aoluain |
|
There has to be something more in this if it is going ahead.
"The Lawsuit Against Craig Wright for 1.1 Million BTC Moves Forward"
There has to be more evidence to back up both parties claims and doesnt the judge have to be privvy to it?
|
|
|
|
R |
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄ ████████████████ ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████ ████████▌███▐████ ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████ ████████████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀ | LLBIT | | | 4,000+ GAMES███████████████████ ██████████▀▄▀▀▀████ ████████▀▄▀██░░░███ ██████▀▄███▄▀█▄▄▄██ ███▀▀▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀███ ██░░░░░░░░█░░░░░░██ ██▄░░░░░░░█░░░░░▄██ ███▄░░░░▄█▄▄▄▄▄████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | █████████ ▀████████ ░░▀██████ ░░░░▀████ ░░░░░░███ ▄░░░░░███ ▀█▄▄▄████ ░░▀▀█████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ | █████████ ░░░▀▀████ ██▄▄▀░███ █░░█▄░░██ ░████▀▀██ █░░█▀░░██ ██▀▀▄░███ ░░░▄▄████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ |
| | | | | | .
| | | ▄▄████▄▄ ▀█▀▄▀▀▄▀█▀ ▄▄░░▄█░██░█▄░░▄▄ ▄▄█░▄▀█░▀█▄▄█▀░█▀▄░█▄▄ ▀▄█░███▄█▄▄█▄███░█▄▀ ▀▀█░░░▄▄▄▄░░░█▀▀ █░░██████░░█ █░░░░▀▀░░░░█ █▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄█ ▄░█████▀▀█████░▄ ▄███████░██░███████▄ ▀▀██████▄▄██████▀▀ ▀▀████████▀▀ | . ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ░▀▄░▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄░▄▀ ███▀▄▀█████████████████▀▄▀ █████▀▄░▄▄▄▄▄███░▄▄▄▄▄▄▀ ███████▀▄▀██████░█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ █████████▀▄▄░███▄▄▄▄▄▄░▄▀ ████████████░███████▀▄▀ ████████████░██▀▄▄▄▄▀ ████████████░▀▄▀ ████████████▄▀ ███████████▀ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄ ▄███▀▄▄███████▄▄▀███▄ ▄██▀▄█▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█▄▀██▄ ▄██▀▄███░░░▀████░███▄▀██▄ ███░████░░░░░▀██░████░███ ███░████░█▄░░░░▀░████░███ ███░████░███▄░░░░████░███ ▀██▄▀███░█████▄░░███▀▄██▀ ▀██▄▀█▄▄▄██████▄██▀▄██▀ ▀███▄▀▀███████▀▀▄███▀ ▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀ | | OFFICIAL PARTNERSHIP SOUTHAMPTON FC FAZE CLAN SSC NAPOLI |
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 11:52:06 PM |
|
There has to be something more in this if it is going ahead.
"The Lawsuit Against Craig Wright for 1.1 Million BTC Moves Forward"
That's what I assumed but it seems that's not the case. If any of this was irrevocable fact we would've known about it for ages. I guess everyone will make an arse of themselves when they get to the courtroom.
|
|
|
|
Betwrong
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2204
I stand with Ukraine.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 03:16:33 PM Last edit: December 30, 2018, 03:33:40 PM by Betwrong |
|
The word "undeniable" here is what strikes me the most. And I would like to ask the community, is it really undeniable that they were involved in Bitcoin from its inception or is it just an example of poor wording?
That document is put forward by the Kleiman family who have a vested interest in claiming there's some money to mud wrestle over. I've never seen any proof from anyone anywhere. I guess they'll also throw in the Gavin Andresen debacle too. The 'proof' bubbling around somewhere from Craigy was a bunch of Gox addresses. I happened to read several U.S. criminal cases, and what I've noticed is that they never say about anything with certainty unless it was proven. Even when talking about someone who was surely a killer, they would call him "the alleged killer" in the case, if the person in question wasn't convicted by the court yet. That's why I was so surprised by their wording in this particular case, and I still don't know the answer to why did they choose to do so? EDIT: Also, do you think the e-mails below are fake? From: Ira K <REDACTED@REDACTED> To: Craig S Wright <craig.wright@hotwirepe.com> Subject: Bond villains Date: Sat Mar 01 19:42:27 +0000 2014 Just to clarify on thoughts from previous email... In one of the email exchanges between Dave and you, he mentioned that you had 1 million Bitcoins in the trust and since you said he has 300,000 as his part. I was figuring the other 700,000 is yours. Is that correct? Ira --- From: Craig S Wright <craig.wright@hotwirepe.com> To: Ira K <REDACTED@REDACTED> Subject: Re: Bond villains Date: Sat Mar 01 20:00:48 +0000 2014 Around that. Minus what was needed for the company's use Sent from my HTC. Same source: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4388885/Wright-Kleiman-Lawsuit.pdf
|
BITCOIN TO THE MOON ☾ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿ ₿
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 03:45:02 PM |
|
EDIT: Also, do you think the e-mails below are fake?
I ain't no lawyer so I've no idea about the ins and outs of their wording. As far as I can tell every single thing that's oozed out of Craigy about his Faketoshiness has either been proven to be fake or could not be truly corroborated.
|
|
|
|
DaCryptoRaccoon
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 05:32:31 PM |
|
Makes you wonder if the recent SV idea was nothing more than a money maker for the storm that lay's ahead. https://www.scribd.com/document/396421275/2018-12-27-Bitcoin-OrderQuite a sick thing to do contacting the family then attempting to rouse them into some kind of deal to pass over the rights or files to parts of the bitcoin system? The ATO provided Ira with three deeds, each titled “IP Deed of Assignment” and each executed on September 15, 2013. Intellectual property rights from an Australian company named “DeMorgan Ltd” to three separate Australian entities: Coin-Exch Pty, Ltd., Hotwire Preemptive Intelligence Pty, Ltd., and Cloudcroft Pty, Ltd. The deeds described the source and nature of the IP as consisting of “source code, algorithms and patentable materials that have been obtained by Craig . . . through the following On April 22, 2014, Ira confronted Craig about the documents he had received from the ATO via email. Ira told Craig that after reviewing the documents sent to him by the ATO, he “felt like there [were] questionable discrepancies in the contracts between [Craig] and W&K such as Dave’s signatures, his resignation, transfer of all accountable value.” Craig responded that his actions were taken “to make sure that the court signed off on what Dave and [he] planned,” and Craig then promised Ira that the Estate could be paid what was owed to it.
|
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ ┃ 𝔱𝔥𝔬𝔲 𝔰𝔥𝔞𝔩𝔱 𝔴𝔬𝔯ⱪ 𝔣𝔬𝔯 𝔶𝔬𝔲𝔯 𝔟𝔞𝔤𝔰 ┃ ┃ ➤21/M ┃ ┃ ███▓▓ ███▓▓ ███▓▓ ███▓▓┃
|
|
|
pixie85
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 07:30:00 PM |
|
If he really faked the signatures he's going to lose a lot of money over it and nobody will care if he has some coins or not. Maybe they'll allow him to pay in BSV? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) The signatures are so bad. He didn't even try to make them look like the real ones. Had to be in real hurry there to get his hands on the money.
|
|
|
|
rodskee
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 2464
Merit: 204
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 09:27:09 PM |
|
That's is a right of everyone to appeals in the court to protect theiirself The motion files of mr. Craig is they want get due process for their case And they can't accuse craig as guilty with out proven strong evindence for him
|
|
|
|
squatter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1196
STOP SNITCHIN'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 11:33:26 PM |
|
I happened to read several U.S. criminal cases, and what I've noticed is that they never say about anything with certainty unless it was proven. Even when talking about someone who was surely a killer, they would call him "the alleged killer" in the case, if the person in question wasn't convicted by the court yet. That's why I was so surprised by their wording in this particular case, and I still don't know the answer to why did they choose to do so? Because they're not objective observers. The Kleiman family aren't like journalists reporting on this in The Times. Their lawyers are putting forward an argument trying to persuade the court. It's obviously based on fabrications and they (and their lawyers) may not realize it, for the same reason that many people believe(d) Craig Wright = Satoshi.
|
|
|
|
|