Postponed ICO after bounty campaign

[kliown]

In their place, if they only recently launched their ICO and collect money in cryptocurrency, then I would not suspend, since the market is now so low, and in six months of ICO (as they now usually last) they will be able to collect a good amount, even a very good one.

[1715594827]

1715594827

[1715594827]

1715594827

[1715594827]

1715594827

[1715594827]

1715594827

[1715594827]

1715594827

[begau]

ICOS campaigns are taking place when there are unfavorable bear market conditions. Depending on the views of the campaign developers, if they have the financial potential they continue the campaigns but some campaigns without the potential they have to stop because the bad market does not attract investors.

[MendozaCharles]

I participated in the bounty Eloncity, Bounty ended in August 2018 but until now they still have not started public sale. They claimed to have mobilized 25 million private sale words, but public sale has not yet had a start date, quite questionable for such projects.

[cudora]

I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.

[Argoo]

Postponing might be a better idea, the ICO launching need to be on the right timing, when a positive trend is happening on the market it will attract more investors, if you force the launching then the result might be not good, and when the start is not good then it could affect the growth and the reputation

Postponing an ICO, that is, suspending it until better times in the cryptocurrency market, is not the best option. Investors and even bounty hunters usually begin to doubt such a project. In addition, many unscrupulous ICO teams deliberately suspend their ICOs in order not to pay bounty hunters in the future. Many suspended ICOs do not resume their activities at all. For example, I participated in the ICO VVTokens project, which conducted the ICO in the period from October 2017 to 01/05/2018. ICO was suspended, payment of tokens to bounty hunters was postponed until June 2018. And since then silence.
Of course, the situation in each ICO project is different. In some cases, suspension is appropriate, in others - not.

[airdropcoin]

Most of the delayed projects have uncertainties, which may make investors too flustered, and investors may sell coins when the coins are listed. But a small number of projects are waiting for a better market, so this is still related to the quality of ICO.

[phuonganhdpa]

if the market will be on the bearish or stable chart until a few years later, will they stop selling the ICO until that time? I don't think that's a reasonable choice. Because they don't know when the market is better. We may have to wait 10 years, 20 years or permanently. That is terrible for those who have invested

[idontcare]

I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.

I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good 

[killerfrost]

I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.

I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good 

For a long time bounty couldn't help bounty hunters make money, so I guess there were a lot of people who gave up on this job and looking for another job

[plr]

The alibis are always been the current market condition, I have been into at least 5 postponed ICO and many more ICO following the trend because they are having a hard time convincing investors that they have a good project the bounty hunters are the losers here.

[rickyharun]

I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.

I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good 

For a long time bounty couldn't help bounty hunters make money, so I guess there were a lot of people who gave up on this job and looking for another job

that's correct mate.much bounty hunter give up with this condition and finally decided to find regular job so they could earn monthly income to fullfill their daily spend.

[Osayo]

I think waiting may be a better option. In fact, you will find that even if the ICO developer issues the token to the participant, the price of the token will not be worth the price. I think if all of us can form a Consensus does not sell tokens, and then wait until the arrival of the bull market, which will benefit everyone.

I don't agree with you on this. Why waiting? Do you know how long the bear market would last? If the price of Bitcoin does not return to $8k plus, does that means such a project will never be launched? If a project is really good, nothing stops its from continuing with its ICO irrespective of the market. You only need to sell a the prevailing market prices. That's all. Besides, there were ICOs even when Bitcoin was far less than the current price today.

[Lagduf]

I think the best decision is to participate in those bounties and hope that they would reach the soft cap, because it is an amazing opportunity of how to earn perspective tokens for low prices. Nowadays there are not so much hunters left.

I find that today there are not too many hunters as well, the projects given are not necessarily good, and many participants may have other ideas such as other people's scamming, I thought little but it could be good 

For a long time bounty couldn't help bounty hunters make money, so I guess there were a lot of people who gave up on this job and looking for another job

that's correct mate.much bounty hunter give up with this condition and finally decided to find regular job so they could earn monthly income to fullfill their daily spend.

If they are using bounty hunters as their main job and it looks very wrong. The result depends on the market and when it gets plunged a lot of assets get less on its price and they will not get any money.
This can become your another activity to spend your free time. There was a lot of reasons why dev postponed the ico.

[maculeth]

still continuing ico is the best way in my opinion. because some of the ico were finished in this bear market situation, they were seriously injured and many participants did not receive their tokens. What's worse, there are some who are scams. this will make the situation worse, it's better to continue the ico again and give an announcement that the end of ico is extended again. in addition to securing their value, but also to get additional funds.

[mbah]

I think the team just afraid for jobs they have fallen since the bear market occurs. When indeed delayed I don't think this is a good result also to aim at the ICO. waiting for a bear market to a stop and then resume the ICO became the way that was done and despite giving the uncertainty but to save the project may be things anew. But if the team believes whatever he does they can compete and thrive I think there is no reason for the delay.

[glasbren]

Since we don't really know what will happen to crypto coin in the future, i think continuing the ICO is way better than waiting until the condition getting better, because there will be no fix date when the market will be back again.

[hellyah070]

Why do they postpone the ICO? I think the bounty is the one that is dependent on the ICO? Well, the bounty should be the one to be postponed not the ICO itself as the ICO is the main project.

[ElenaN]

In my opinion, if you do not doubt your product, there is no point in stopping ICO, you need to continue!

[petrcoin]

Well, they probably tried to raise some money while bounty was active and they failed so they decided to postpone. Probably that ico never worth anything anytime.

[NakiRR]

If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they  see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO?

If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the  ICO after all, they  just need few funds.
By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming  funds in  this bear market.

Here are list of projects that did it;

blackbox
WeiDEX
BXBET

I think they also claimed they do have a working product.

It is normally i think, that projects that you have mentioned above are too weak to continue their token sales n a bearish market. No one will invest in it with such a high risk to lose his money. And i'm fully agree about ready and working product and don't like too greedy projects the main purpose of which is to collect funds as much as it is possible.