Postponed ICO after bounty campaign

[ArtemSergeevich]

I do not trust those projects that put off the ICO, as they had to prepare in advance for bad times and think through their development in a bear market. No one knows when it will end and we must act in reality.

[yrrehc16]

It is alway on the team decision wether to continue and postponed the ICO.
But that is the big question also, even it is on the bear market why they need to postpone the ICO if they know that their project is good?
This makes me think that the ICO team are just into money in the market and not with the success of the project.

[papagravel]

If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they  see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO?

If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the  ICO after all, they  just need few funds.
By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming  funds in  this bear market.

Here are list of projects that did it;

blackbox
WeiDEX
BXBET

I think they also claimed they do have a working product.

The developers see that many promising projects raise little money and they are afraid to carry out their ICO.
However, I am sure that if the project has a good working model and a good chance to bring profit to investors, then it will definitely collect the necessary investments.

[bohboh]

I really don't think its a nice idea to end the ICO because of bear market, my opinion is that, if the project is real and they have good concept, people will definitely buy from their ico and its will definitely succeed during bear market.

[fathur01]

I think it is better to continue the ICO, as the market will fall even lower and everyone expects it, and if it falls even lower, then many will leave the crypto-currencies. And do not say that it will be on the contrary tempting offer to buy more, as the news background will also contribute to panic and sale!

[GymClassHeroes]

If a project claims they were able to raise enough cash from ICO and were able to build a working product,I really do not see the need to keep investors waiting.First,no one can tell when the bear market will end,secondly,they already got the go ahead from investors who saw some good in their oroject and decided to invest

[pedpedped101]

I am sure that most of those projects did not plan well before starting. At least, that would have created enough awareness and investors would have been waiting for them to lunch.
Sometimes, it can be very painful, one just have to take it as one of those things.

[marcbitcoins]

This is commonly happening now in this bearish market in which at first they expect much investments so that their project will be successfully implemented but if they failed to attract people to invest then they should extend it or postponed it as they need much money to pay the expenses of the project. To postponed is better than a scam project in which bounty hardworked is wasted.

[CryptoTech_]

You need to add one more project, Buddy postponed the ICO after the Bounty was finished for a long time and until now there has been no clarity about the ICO, and investors have begun to lose confidence, can be seen from the telegram group whose members are getting smaller

[bitcoin31]

So sad because you waste your time. After the bounty the ICO postponed maybe not continue.

[nutildah]

As bounty hunters you have very little if any power of the control of an ICO. Nobody really cares about your opinions because they realize you are just spambots that use human brains. Frankly I don't know why ICOs continue to use "bounty hunters" -- a far more glorious name for spamming a forum or social media than it deserves.

[Altero]

As bounty hunters you have very little if any power of the control of an ICO. Nobody really cares about your opinions because they realize you are just spambots that use human brains. Frankly I don't know why ICOs continue to use "bounty hunters" -- a far more glorious name for spamming a forum or social media than it deserves.

I'll do respect your opinion and hows you appreciate the way bounty hunters work for. Yes we can deny many of them didn't do their job well and so they tried to cheat the game just for the seek of having big rewards in the end but some of them are religiously did it.
Some postponement of ICO due to the market condition and they can't generate money for the support of their project. It sad it end up with nothing for the promoters and considered as a scam.

[Muzika]

So sad because you waste your time. After the bounty the ICO postponed maybe not continue.

If the ICO conduct a bounty campaign before their ICO starts and it will postponed during the public sale most likely the campaign will end to a scam project, because the most critical part of a campaign is during the public sale they should still conducting a campaign to introduce their product to the people.

[Sarisang]

they expect the best results from the ICO. Learn and see many of the ICO are falling because of the crypto red seems to be a serious consideration for the team. Yet this is certainly also a disservice to the participants of the bounty as they will long enough get paid from the results of their work.

[Pffrt]

I think postponed is a good idea because the market is not so good and it may lead a good project to bad one. By the way, like as you said if they have a working product, I think it would be better to launch because some other ay come up with the same in the market.

[libert19]

These ICOs should either start bounty campaigns after minimum funds are raised or bounty hunters should choose projects where project is going to continue.

[Caladonian]

These ICOs should either start bounty campaigns after minimum funds are raised or bounty hunters should choose projects where project is going to continue.

Following you with your concept, it's best for the project to start bounty campaign when they already gained enough money to fund the project's development, this bounty will serve an additional promotions and give a little slice of allocated funds as any business needs to have advertisement
and promotions, good project won't cancel the process if they are certain that the development will continue and the usage will be huge to their
target market.

[Jrfranco]

If the team did a bounty campaign already for weeks and postponed the ICO after they  see the bear market hasn't yet ended, do you think they are best to wait for the market to get better or just continue the ICO?

If they already have a working product, why not jsut continue the  ICO after all, they  just need few funds.
By the way Lyfe Project collected overwhelming  funds in  this bear market.

Here are list of projects that did it;

blackbox
WeiDEX
BXBET

I think they also claimed they do have a working product.

I am actively participating in some other bounty projects, and i encountered this case, after the bounty program they postponed the public ICO because as they said, the market condition is not favorable to do the selling of tokens,. i think its a good idea maybe, because they can protect themselves and also the funds from the investors i think.