📢【ANN】【ICO】COINWARE -A Friendly CryptoCurrency Exchange--PRIVATE SALE(LIVE)🔥

[Miiike]

this is just talking about blockchain in general not coinware whilst, its a common term.

Good day
The term is a simple word and worldly use in the ecosystem

There is a huge and clear difference between accidentally having a similar idea of common term and plagiarism. As shown in evidence, the words are verbatim. Learn the difference.

Nothing like plagiarism because we never follow the path of bitfinex and this quite a new exchange with unique feature

Let me invite you to learn about the definition of plagiarism, as quoted from one of the definition by plagiarism.org; "to use (another's production) without crediting the source".

And allow me to invite the three of you to learn about what can be considered as plagiarism, as cited from plagiarism.org as well

1. turning in someone else's work as your own
2. copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
3. failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
4. giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
5. changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
6. copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not

Well?

[clement_star]

this is just talking about blockchain in general not coinware whilst, its a common term.

Good day
The term is a simple word and worldly use in the ecosystem

There is a huge and clear difference between accidentally having a similar idea of common term and plagiarism. As shown in evidence, the words are verbatim. Learn the difference.

Nothing like plagiarism because we never follow the path of bitfinex and this quite a new exchange with unique feature

Let me invite you to learn about the definition of plagiarism, as quoted from one of the definition by plagiarism.org; "to use (another's production) without crediting the source".

And allow me to invite the three of you to learn about what can be considered as plagiarism, as cited from plagiarism.org as well

1. turning in someone else's work as your own
2. copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
3. failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
4. giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
5. changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
6. copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not

Well?

Like I mentioned before these are common terms.
Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.

[nutildah]

Like I mentioned before these are common terms.
Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.

A "term" refers to one or two words. Your whitepaper has plagiarized entire paragraphs. There's a huge difference.

From the Forbes article:

What businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based

• Benefits from public scrutiny

• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten

• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer

From your whitepaper:

How businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer

The only thing you really changed was the first word of the title of the section, from "What" to "How." Pretty lame. Any last words before I tag you as a scammer? This is your last chance. Think carefully.

[javiskhat]

Any specific date for beta launch and APP ? Caint wait

Stay tuned
Beta launch will be occurring in the first quarter 2019. However the app will follow in the second quarter

[annbagira]

Hello all! I read some posts below about plagiarism and I have doubts about team of this project. I don't see here any real arguments from Coinware team. From now I am neither an ambassador, not a member of the Coinware team! (27 JAN. 2019)

[nutildah]

Hello all! I read some posts below about plagiarism and I have doubts about team of this project. I don't see here any real arguments from Coinware team. From now I am neither an ambassador, not a member of the Coinware team! (27 JAN. 2019)

Smart move.

I recommend all investors steer clear of this project as legitimate projects do not plagiarize their whitepapers.

[Miiike]

Well?

Like I mentioned before these are common terms.
Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.

Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.

So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam

[akhat_omo]

Well?

Like I mentioned before these are common terms.
Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.

Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.

So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam

You can check out the website and verify the coinware team yourself. You can visit Ico sites and check out the coinware project. You can also talk to the core team one on one on Telegram, zoom or if you wish to arrange a meeting in person.

[nutildah]

Well?

Like I mentioned before these are common terms.
Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.

Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.

So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam

You can check out the website and verify the coinware team yourself. You can visit Ico sites and check out the coinware projects. You can also talk to the core team one on one on Telegram, zoom or if you wish to arrange a meeting in person.

What about the massive plagiarism in the white paper? Why not spend the time to write your own paper knowing that a plagiarized white paper is one of the top signs of a scam ICO?

[akhat_omo]

Well?

Like I mentioned before these are common terms.
Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.

Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.

So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam

You can check out the website and verify the coinware team yourself. You can visit Ico sites and check out the coinware projects. You can also talk to the core team one on one on Telegram, zoom or if you wish to arrange a meeting in person.

What about the massive plagiarism in the white paper? Why not spend the time to write your own paper knowing that a plagiarized white paper is one of the top signs of a scam ICO?

What's is the meaning of plagiarism?
A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.

[javiskhat]

Well?

Like I mentioned before these are common terms.
Also, thanks for the observation. It shows you are following our community.

Oh please, by all means, the courtesy of observing plagiarism fall into Nutildah, a very great job for pointing that out. I didn't even notice as I'm too busy wondering about your self-acclaimed security and competitive advantages... which you still fail to clarify up to this second.

So, there will be two concerns to be addressed by now, either clarify or admit you're scam

You can check out the website and verify the coinware team yourself. You can visit Ico sites and check out the coinware projects. You can also talk to the core team one on one on Telegram, zoom or if you wish to arrange a meeting in person.

What about the massive plagiarism in the white paper? Why not spend the time to write your own paper knowing that a plagiarized white paper is one of the top signs of a scam ICO?

Go through the white paper thoroughly and see what Coinware stands for. We have our own model and vision to achieve which does not in anyway related to bitfinex.
Please, kindly reframe from fuddling.
Thanks

[nutildah]

A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.

OK I'll save you the hassle of having to scroll up a few comments and paste for you the evidence again:

Your whitepaper has plagiarized entire paragraphs.

From a Forbes article:

What businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based

• Benefits from public scrutiny

• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten

• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer

From your whitepaper:

How businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer

That's what plagiarism is. You stole somebody else's content word-for-word and made it your own. What's your explanation for this?

[javiskhat]

Hello all! I read some posts below about plagiarism and I have doubts about team of this project. I don't see here any real arguments from Coinware team. From now I am neither an ambassador, not a member of the Coinware team! (27 JAN. 2019)

Good luck.
Everyone has their choice. You were not in depth with the coinware project.

[nutildah]

A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.

OK I'll save you the hassle of having to scroll up a few comments and paste for you the evidence again:

Your whitepaper has plagiarized entire paragraphs.

From a Forbes article:

What businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based

• Benefits from public scrutiny

• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten

• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer

From your whitepaper:

How businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer

That's what plagiarism is. You stole somebody else's content word-for-word and made it your own. What's your explanation for this?

This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters

Dictionary result for term
/tərm/Submit
noun
1.
a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
"the musical term “leitmotiv”"
synonyms:   word, expression, phrase, turn of phrase, idiom, locution

Your white paper has copied word-for-word entire sections. This is plagiarism. Its the result of not having your own ideas, or anything original to say, probably because you are putting out a scam and didn't think to go into much detail.

[javiskhat]

A reference to blockchain definition does not in anyway termed plagiarism.

OK I'll save you the hassle of having to scroll up a few comments and paste for you the evidence again:

Your whitepaper has plagiarized entire paragraphs.

From a Forbes article:

What businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership in a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralized server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralized and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralized and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from its use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based

• Benefits from public scrutiny

• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten

• Decentralization benefits the end user or customer

From your whitepaper:

How businesses benefit?

Prior to the advent of the blockchain, there was no way to secure and validate ownership of a digital asset or verify a transaction in a trustless, public manner. Take, for example, the act of utilizing a software license to gain access to a program like Microsoft Word. To enforce the right to use the software, it must check a centralised server operated by Microsoft. If Microsoft wanted, it could deny access to the software or transfer those permissions to another user. While we consider Microsoft a trusted entity, the risk of illicit behavior increases when an untrusted party is introduced.

Perhaps a better example is ownership of a more valuable asset, such as a substantial share in a company or valuable digital asset such as a one-off piece of digital artwork. To transfer shares of ownership in a company, the current model requires stacks of paperwork, a lawyer or a centralised and trusted entity, such as the New York Stock Exchange.

What about transferring a digital asset like art? How do you prevent people from copying the digital file and sending many others a copy? If there’s no way to publicly verify the transfer of a single asset to a single entity, then there’s no way to enforce ownership or authenticity. This is why the value in art is always in the physical good.

The blockchain is the first technology that enables the transfer of digital ownership in a decentralised and trustless manner. In fact, there are companies like Polymath that are disrupting the industry by creating digital tokens that can represent ownership in a company, or DAEX, which is seeking to disrupt the world of digital
art by publishing ownership on the blockchain.

While technology and supporting platforms around the blockchain ecosystem are sure to evolve, to answer the question of which businesses will initially benefit from it’s use, are the ones which possess the following traits:

• Transaction-based
• Benefits from public scrutiny
• Benefits from history that can’t be rewritten
• Decentralisation benefits the end user or customer

That's what plagiarism is. You stole somebody else's content word-for-word and made it your own. What's your explanation for this?

This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters

Dictionary result for term
/tərm/Submit
noun
1.
a word or phrase used to describe a thing or to express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or branch of study.
"the musical term “leitmotiv”"
synonyms:   word, expression, phrase, turn of phrase, idiom, locution

Your white paper has copied word-for-word entire sections. This is plagiarism. Its the result of not having your own ideas, or anything original to say, probably because you are putting out a scam and didn't think to go into much detail.

It quite sad that you flagged me red.
But it's all okay. I will inform the coinware team about your discovery. I am sure they will have a look at it critically and get back to you. Thanks once again.

[Miiike]

This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters

There were not any kind of mention of forbes as the source, and although there is a guideline for the proper way to cite sources, but as you kept insisting that what you do is not wrong, let's clear this issue by this way, kindly show the legal permit issued by forbes that you're allowed to copy part of their article.

With this said, I'd like to point us out to one of forbes article, a fraction at least.

All of the information, content, services and software displayed on, transmitted through, or used in connection with the Website or Other Channels, including for example, advertising, directories, guides, articles, opinions, reviews, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, software, data, and all other related matters, including without limitation, the selection and arrangement of the aforementioned and the "look and feel" of this website (collectively, the "Content"), are protected under applicable copyrights and other proprietary (including but not limited to intellectual property) rights and are the intellectual property of Forbes, and its affiliated companies, licensors and suppliers. Forbes actively protects its rights to the Content to the fullest extent of the law. The copying, rearrangement, broadcast, rewriting for broadcast or publication, redistribution, modification, use or publication by you in any medium, directly or indirectly, of any such matters or any part of the Website, including the removal or alteration of advertising, except for limited rights of use granted hereunder, is strictly prohibited. You may not use such material except as provided in these Terms and Conditions.

As most of us have a copy of your WP and the said forbes article is available for public, it'll be safe to say that the evidences (should the need arise) is available and present. You might want to consult to Mr. David Meszaros for this, as he is listed as your legal advisor on the team structure.

[ICOEthics]

WARNING - PLAGIARIZED WHITEPAPER - POSSIBLE SCAM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103425.0

[akhat_omo]

This is a general term. I hope you understand this. This part is talking about business betters

There were not any kind of mention of forbes as the source, and although there is a guideline for the proper way to cite sources, but as you kept insisting that what you do is not wrong, let's clear this issue by this way, kindly show the legal permit issued by forbes that you're allowed to copy part of their article.

With this said, I'd like to point us out to one of forbes article, a fraction at least.

All of the information, content, services and software displayed on, transmitted through, or used in connection with the Website or Other Channels, including for example, advertising, directories, guides, articles, opinions, reviews, text, photographs, images, illustrations, audio clips, video, html, source and object code, software, data, and all other related matters, including without limitation, the selection and arrangement of the aforementioned and the "look and feel" of this website (collectively, the "Content"), are protected under applicable copyrights and other proprietary (including but not limited to intellectual property) rights and are the intellectual property of Forbes, and its affiliated companies, licensors and suppliers. Forbes actively protects its rights to the Content to the fullest extent of the law. The copying, rearrangement, broadcast, rewriting for broadcast or publication, redistribution, modification, use or publication by you in any medium, directly or indirectly, of any such matters or any part of the Website, including the removal or alteration of advertising, except for limited rights of use granted hereunder, is strictly prohibited. You may not use such material except as provided in these Terms and Conditions.

As most of us have a copy of your WP and the said forbes article is available for public, it'll be safe to say that the evidences (should the need arise) is available and present. You might want to consult to Mr. David Meszaros for this, as he is listed as your legal advisor on the team structure.

I understand how this looks

[akhat_omo]

WARNING - PLAGIARIZED WHITEPAPER - POSSIBLE SCAM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103425.0

Coinware will undergo a review on the whitepaper.
Thanks for pointing this out

[nutildah]

You guys never updated your white paper, and now you've employed a bump bot service to bump your thread... hmm... really doesn't look good, guys.

If I were investor I would immediately skip this project in favor of something that doesn't have outstanding scam accusations against it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103425.0

There's literally hundreds of other investment opportunities to choose from. Why take a risk on a project that might be fraudulent?