Buy back ICO tokens after ICO

[Saint1990]

Common OP I dont think buying back bounty hunters token will help projects to maintain their price on the exchange bounty hunters get only 1% to 3% of total allocation or total token sold. Take recent examples of projects like FIIICoin & Hyperquant, they are yet to distribute their tokens to bounty participants & their price has been already dropped around 50% to 80%. The ICOs need to shedule release of token strategy wise if they want to maintain their price as presale investors who get huge discounts at the time of token sale dumps their tokens when listed on exchange.

[Little Mouse]

Almost all of the ICO use BTC and ETH as a payment method for selling ICO token. Have you seen the price reduction in both of this coin? Some projects even are not able to conduct their project just because of it. How can they buy back the token even if it is a lower price, they have to pay more than they have collected from ICO.

[Prettymie]

The team will only buying backs their token if the project have already gain profits after their launching of the product. This is mostly the reason why such promising project will go dumps after the get listed on exchanges as the team can't afford to buy back due to the budget was only allocated for development at the early stage. Mostly some ICO has protection on their investors to control the market price but if the situation is getting worse due the downfall of bitcoin and ETH then they will end-up losing and the last thing they will do is to let the market stabilize before doing a buy-back.

[CryptoAlphaStar]

Helbiz also did that and some other projects I can't remember.
And it makes sense, if they believe in the future of their project.
But the raised funds are usually planned for another expenses upfront and they don't have the resouces to do that.

[chanler]

Every team behind the ICO will have their considerations why they should buy or not buy back the coins from the bounty hunters. So far, actually, there are some ICO projects that do that kind of ways. However, most of them don't take this why because it may be too risky for the team.

[sujonali1819]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

Yea buy back after ICO is the best way to grow up the value of any token. But it is depends of the team members of that project.I saw this type of one project that named pund x (npxs). I saw this project grow the value of token approx 10x by buy back after ico.

[indriasyifa]

I see many ICO projects that use the concept, which is to buy back token after the ICO. what I understand from that method, the Buyback to hold off the release of tokens in the market, and this ICO company bought back so that the price of the token remained at ICO prices.

[xianbits]

I believe, for the team behind every project, they don't see any sign yet to make buy back orders. Maybe the are still expecting more dump or what. They might have not full faith with their project as well.

[korean1999]

Why did they buy back their token. For them, those tokens are not important, they sold them from public sale and private sale. They will receive money from it and gradually leave their projects. Many ICOs have done so in 2018 and of course those are scam projects

[catur_072]

In my opinion, we can see what they are doing ICO for? they conducted this ICO to raise sufficient funds to develop their projects. so after the ICO, the funds they got were used for the development of their projects, and after their projects were truly successful, they would again buy their ICO Tokens at a fairly high price.

[JayCue]

If they say that there will be a buy-back in their token, then they should do that. But only a few projects add such feature in their roadmap because they focus more on the development of their project or in building partnerships.

[danielchris]

I think it's only depends on team of projects. what they thought about the project. as how much fund they used for development the project.

[caffu chino]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

I don't think this is right. better is not to buy when ico but buy when already listed on the exchange. this is more profitable because all new coins must be destroyed when they first enter the market.

[mirawantirinjana]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

I don't really understand, why do most of the ICO projects that end successfully, not buybacks, doesn't that help the price of their coins so they don't fall? like the OP example of the Counting House (CHT) project

[cryp24x]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

Well, it all depends on the team. It is a good thing that some buy back their tokens to be able to make their tokens stable but on the other hand, some companies tend to use the funds for the development of the project. If the project will do well then there's no need to buy back because the tokens will rise up like a charm. When the company will have enough funds to buy back after the launch of the project then that will be a double win for the project and from the users who have their tokens.

[tamango]

There are some projects that are doing so but there are very few projects like these ones. The reason I think is because most of ICO are projects from scratch so ICO funds are essential for development of project and so they can't buy back their tokens.

[khufuking]

If there is a plan to buy back tokens from investors or even bounty hunters you will find it clearly mentioned heavy marketed in there ICO phase and you will see it mentioned in their whitepaper and roadmap, if there is no plan to do so from the start then they are not obligated to do it, some other ICO uses some other forms to help maintain their own token/coin price such as Burning events and Airdrops to holders, and in most cases these things will also be there in their roadmap from start.

[Denreal]

Most projects these days are finding it difficult to raise money and this has been an issue for quite some time now. Some just manage to raise softcap and then the token sake is over. Funds like are spent in the project to get good product. When they decide to buy back without developing their product, it will amount to waste of money, because it will still dump, but a good working product helps the project to grow.

[mohammedmattar]

Hi,
just now I think about why past ICOs are not buying back their tokens for cheap price from bounty hunters and other dumpers?
Why they do not use money collected from ICO to do that?
Look at CountingHouse for example, they helping price to grow and it is really working!

For serious projects, they do this in accordance with the token price promotion program, as well as the burning of some Tokens
But it is in small percentages because the money they collected has other uses in completing the project from buying equipment or hiring competencies ... etc

[Madstayler]

Most of the projects after ICO are not at all interested in the price of tokens, and even in chat rooms they write that they are developers and they are not interested in what happens there with the price. In such cases, it is immediately clear that the developers wanted to collect only money and are not interested in anything else. It turns out that the tokens that they have blocked for themselves they do not need at all, since they do not.