Creation gave birth to humane being and athiests and theists part of it.

[sudeshkumar]

What were the reasons for the birth of the creation of this universe are still a mystery for the scientists as well as the so called firm believer of God .No one knows the exact planning of this creation .It is just the reasoned thinking we are calling ourselves athiests and thiests .The theory of nothingness is widely accepted by both the communities .It is just like that a seed came first or the tree because a tree is grown with the seed and the seed is grown from the fruit of the tree which came first is still not known and matter of the following which theory we like to follow.
Similar is the theory of athiests and thiests it is just a matter of the following which theory you like most.

[ATMD]

What were the reasons for the birth of the creation of this universe are still a mystery for the scientists as well as the so called firm believer of God .No one knows the exact planning of this creation .It is just the reasoned thinking we are calling ourselves athiests and thiests .The theory of nothingness is widely accepted by both the communities .It is just like that a seed came first or the tree because a tree is grown with the seed and the seed is grown from the fruit of the tree which came first is still not known and matter of the following which theory we like to follow.
Similar is the theory of athiests and thiests it is just a matter of the following which theory you like most.

Seeds came first 

[BADecker]

God created all things for a variety of reason, at least some of which we will never understand in this life. One of these is that God is love (https://biblehub.com/1_john/4-8.htm), and He created everything so that He would have objects to love.

Another reason is 2 Corinthians 12:9:

But he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me.

[Spendulus]

What were the reasons for the birth of the creation of this universe are still a mystery for the scientists as well as the so called firm believer of God .No one knows the exact planning of this creation .It is just the reasoned thinking we are calling ourselves athiests and thiests .The theory of nothingness is widely accepted by both the communities .It is just like that a seed came first or the tree because a tree is grown with the seed and the seed is grown from the fruit of the tree which came first is still not known and matter of the following which theory we like to follow.
Similar is the theory of athiests and thiests it is just a matter of the following which theory you like most.

I think it's important to understand that when a phenomena is looked at from the scientific viewpoint, the very LAST THING to attribute as causation is "the Work of God (you fill in your version)." In fact, it's more typical that if the causation is not understood or is unknown, that will be simply stated as such.

It's only with the emergence of this method of thinking in the 17th century, that Europe pulled itself out of the medieval mindset and we started to progress in many ways.

Further, note that often it's the mark of a lazy mind to flippantly attribute God as cause.

[KingScorpio]

What were the reasons for the birth of the creation of this universe are still a mystery for the scientists as well as the so called firm believer of God .No one knows the exact planning of this creation .It is just the reasoned thinking we are calling ourselves athiests and thiests .The theory of nothingness is widely accepted by both the communities .It is just like that a seed came first or the tree because a tree is grown with the seed and the seed is grown from the fruit of the tree which came first is still not known and matter of the following which theory we like to follow.
Similar is the theory of athiests and thiests it is just a matter of the following which theory you like most.

atheists are like a training software, and bots, that test religious people on their meaning and integrity.

[sudeshkumar]

What were the reasons for the birth of the creation of this universe are still a mystery for the scientists as well as the so called firm believer of God .No one knows the exact planning of this creation .It is just the reasoned thinking we are calling ourselves athiests and thiests .The theory of nothingness is widely accepted by both the communities .It is just like that a seed came first or the tree because a tree is grown with the seed and the seed is grown from the fruit of the tree which came first is still not known and matter of the following which theory we like to follow.
Similar is the theory of athiests and thiests it is just a matter of the following which theory you like most.

I think it's important to understand that when a phenomena is looked at from the scientific viewpoint, the very LAST THING to attribute as causation is "the Work of God (you fill in your version)." In fact, it's more typical that if the causation is not understood or is unknown, that will be simply stated as such.

It's only with the emergence of this method of thinking in the 17th century, that Europe pulled itself out of the medieval mindset and we started to progress in many ways.

Further, note that often it's the mark of a lazy mind to flippantly attribute God as cause.

It is true that with scientific viewpoint, everything is attributed to cause but it was nothing new that scientists have found, science/phenomenon was already there ,they merely researched with techniques the whole phenomenon , do not give them the ownership of the creation.

[BADecker]

What were the reasons for the birth of the creation of this universe are still a mystery for the scientists as well as the so called firm believer of God .No one knows the exact planning of this creation .It is just the reasoned thinking we are calling ourselves athiests and thiests .The theory of nothingness is widely accepted by both the communities .It is just like that a seed came first or the tree because a tree is grown with the seed and the seed is grown from the fruit of the tree which came first is still not known and matter of the following which theory we like to follow.
Similar is the theory of athiests and thiests it is just a matter of the following which theory you like most.

I think it's important to understand that when a phenomena is looked at from the scientific viewpoint, the very LAST THING to attribute as causation is "the Work of God (you fill in your version)." In fact, it's more typical that if the causation is not understood or is unknown, that will be simply stated as such.

It's only with the emergence of this method of thinking in the 17th century, that Europe pulled itself out of the medieval mindset and we started to progress in many ways.

Further, note that often it's the mark of a lazy mind to flippantly attribute God as cause.

The lazy scientific mind that does not recognize the programming in the cause and effect of the universe, is simply to weak to understand that the word and descriptions of God far understate His power and ability.

[ATMD]

It is unfortunate that God is misunderstood to be the "god of the gaps"

Given a choice between "god of the gaps" and science, who would choose the former?

God is not the god of the gaps.