KYC should be for big whales

[Huntler1993]

I think you have a pint in there what most hunters earn is just peanut but there are always the heavy investors who  could regulate the market from time to time. KYC will be good for them to know their doings.

[1715210828]

1715210828

[1715210828]

1715210828

[1715210828]

1715210828

[1715210828]

1715210828

[maianh09]

KYC should be a mandatory action for everyone. Because if you may not need to complete KYC because it is a low expense, whales can also use multiple accounts with small transactions to avoid KYC. So I think KYC must be for everyone if you are the right person, why should you be afraid of implementing KYC?

[Kiefner]

Big Whales will always work around, so I think that the KYC is for us, no matter how sad it is. And also I think that no one will cancel the KYC, you can not even hope.

[Sundaey]

I believe you are right about that, we can't see the major reasons why bounty hunters are always wanted in kyc process. But they also believe that people are found of using multiple accounts to participate in bounty campaign so why do we blame them? You should be the one to avoid bounty with kyc.

[baeva2]

Of course, it would be correct - KYC for big whales, but it will not. And no matter how much we want, this procedure will soon be implemented everywhere.

[ityandsyn]

I'm here today to drop my own point about how KYC should be use
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying

      KYC requirements for everyone has have a good intentions but it can be abuse of some bad elements wants to use our credentials for any purpose so that's the point of others , but we can have alternative ways instead of submitting our credentials just to claim our tokens.

[Mysteryla]

Most whales these days do not invest in ICOs. Most of them wait for the coin to list on exchange before buying. Sometimes, they intention cause dump in the price of the coin on exchange.
Most times, retail investors  are the ones that buy ICOs, except in private sales, where some whales might be interested to throwing some money into, because coins are cheap at that stage.

[nemey]

KYC is a new way to be applied. It is for all investors that will buy the tokens or coins in the ICOs or IEOs, and other token offering. If you want to buy the coins or tokens projects, you need to require KYC, it will be app;lied for all, not and if the big whales are also going to involve, they will also do such things.

[Japinat]

Of course, it would be correct - KYC for big whales, but it will not. And no matter how much we want, this procedure will soon be implemented everywhere.

It's redundant, whales are already big, you cannot call them big whales. 
While some are against of the KYC, it should be for everyone if the project will require, but it's still better
if there is no KYC because it will bring more attention from investors, but whales wants to be safe so they will look on a trusted project
probably with KYC.

Non KYC attract more investors, while KYC will gain big investors.

[sonicwave]

I agree that major players must undergo a serious KYC, but I also don’t mind if the team members of this or that project also went through KYC, so that we would know who we work with!

Why is everyone looking at their side and believe that they are at risk more than the developers of the project. True and in no other way, no one will agree to work on a bare trust, especially when most of the projects brought losses.

[as9ardia]

I think KYC is required for every aspect (Investors, Developers and also Bounty Hunters). If you didn't feel confidence with KYC then you should invest on "Real-Life" Investment 

[gabmen]

I think KYC is required for every aspect (Investors, Developers and also Bounty Hunters). If you didn't feel confidence with KYC then you should invest on "Real-Life" Investment 

Lol. Real life invesents would require kyc more than crypto investments. Having big whales undergo kyc should in a way, regulate pump and dump manipulations by these people.

[Barinerro]

Of course, it would be correct - KYC for big whales, but it will not. And no matter how much we want, this procedure will soon be implemented everywhere.

I think most people who have a lot of money in cryptocurrency will not want to pass kyc, because of its security, I think soon will enjoy decentralized exchange in great demand

[zarintasnim]

KYC for big customer is already going. For large amount i think KYC must to protect fraud. But bounty and airdrop KYC i am not support because i am not your customer. I am just promote your project.

[Fumzy]

I'm here today to drop my own point about how KYC should be use
- KYC requirement for bounties and airdrops is so unreasonable ,KYC implementation is no doubt a good idea but it should be forced only on big investors that wants to buy large amount of a token either From Exchanges
- there should be limit for KYC requirements e.g like if an investor wants to buy 10,000$ worths of tokens upward then he or she must go through KYC ,just saying

I keep saying this too. KYC should be for those who are investing very large sums. If someone just has $100 to invest in a project what is the use for KYC? If KYC becomes fully necessary in the crypto space I think the level of scam will increase instead of decrease because scammers with the intention to obtain users data can do so through a token launch

[atjiat]

KYC for big customer is already going. For large amount i think KYC must to protect fraud. But bounty and airdrop KYC i am not support because i am not your customer. I am just promote your project.

I fully agree with your opinion and I would also like the Headhunters to be relieved of the provision of personal data. In any case, in the cryptocurrency market there are certain aspects regarding the investor and traders, but the requirements for the Bounty companies are nowhere Where are not officially spelled out.

[Invigorated]

Actually, I believe KYC should be for investors of a particular project due to compliance. What I really don't understand or get is KYC being demanded for Airdroppers and bounty hunters. It actually makes no sense since these set of people aren't investors. Sometimes, I see KYC for bounty hunters and Airdroppers as a means of denying them what they have worked for. It shouldn't be required!

[MidnightWolf]

Actually, I believe KYC should be for investors of a particular project due to compliance. What I really don't understand or get is KYC being demanded for Airdroppers and bounty hunters. It actually makes no sense since these set of people aren't investors. Sometimes, I see KYC for bounty hunters and Airdroppers as a means of denying them what they have worked for. It shouldn't be required!

some options provide KYC  does not make sense, because it is contrary to the very nature of the decentralization of cryptocurrency. But how then all the talk about anonymity is not controllability? It seems to me that the entire PR of cryptocurrency in 2016 was possible precisely because of such opportunities.

[tonibyuzen]

Many bounty hunters earn a large number of coins, which is equivalent to significant amounts in dollars. So I think the introduction of KYC is a justified step. In addition, it protects bounty hunters from scammers who use multiple accounts to participate.

[Olayinka225]

I agree with you that,  kyc should be meant for the big investors those that have the larger percentage shares or token of a particular project and leaving the small of few shares hodler without kyc.