bounty hunter paid USDT?

[Kryten12]

Ask yourself this question, if a project can get free advertising by allocating a portion of their generated tokens to send to bounty hunters then why would they divert cash raised from ICO to spend instead?

[Debonaire217]

do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

In that case, USDT's market cap will be bullish. Also, it is not favorable for ICO to pay in USDT rather than choosing their own coin to pay bounty hunters. Still it is advantage for ICOS to choose their coin.

[adamin1i]

When the ICO is finished, it's a dream to expect bounty hunters to pay as USDT for people who don't even pay tokens. it would be great to make payments via weekly or escrow. this way people can stop working for projects that don't pay.

[mersal]

do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

I always supports the people getting paid for their work so its upto the bounty hunters by what they are wroking for,if they are willing to take risk of getting paid only after the ICO then its their decision.I am not doing bounties anymore so joined on BTC campaign even if the payout is very low.

[GREENch]

do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

When a person for work not related to cryptocurrencies is paid in dollars, you do not ask whether it is good or bad. I would be happy if bounty hunters were paid to participate in bounty campaigns in the USDT.

[gensol]

do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

What we always forget is the fact that bounty hunters are also investors, people who has invested their time, energy and resources to market a product. Paying them in USD is a good thing or partly in stable coins.

[kogozer714]

strongly agree if it's true it will happen, but it's impossible to happen if the developer does something like that maybe they would rather give a gift of their coin / token than they have to lose because they gave the USDT to the bounty hunters

[beami]

If hunters are paid with USDT it is good and this will have a stable value so that it can avoid dumping. But for projects and investors who are less creative in developing tokens/coins offered, maybe real products can happen and this has a difference in the value of each country.

[shad_ow90]

do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

Woa, it is too good if bounty hunters are paid by USDT. They will not also dump tokens by any price and don't make effect to the price of this project when it is listed in market

[Perie200]

I think that none of us would refuse to receive dollars for work, but it can only be in dreams. As a rule, projects do not have such capital to cover the costs of marketing and promotion of their project. And on the other hand, why should projects give Fiat money when it is more profitable for them to pay with tokens that cost nothing ( perhaps they will not cost a cent either when

[Santri]

how will they pay bounty hunters with USD where will they get USD have to take funds from investors who then the project cannot develop because of running out of funds think about it

[mirakal]

do you agree if the bounty hunter is paid USDT?
the good or bad impact on investors and the development of the ICO project, give your reasons

I think this is good to avoid the bounty hunters of being scammed but this is bad for the growth of crypto because the number of ICO will certainly decrease. For a project to be able to run a bounty, they need to have at least a decent amount of money for marketing in order pay their supporters.

I believe this method will not work for most of the ICO and with that said, I believe they would stick with the current way of rewarding bounty.

[Taner]

I suppose we will never be paid in dollars. Projects that pay in ether or bitcoin - it's very rare. What can we say about fiat, it's from the realm of fantasy.

[wayancrypto]

In my opinion payment of bounty reward in USDT is good idea because the bounty hunter will not dump the token price. And this is make bounty hunter make easy to manage the reward because just receive 1 stable coin. This way will give benefits to the bounty hunter and also investor.

[S[m]OKE]

It is time to pay the hunters to pay not tokens that the project does not complete, but to make payments, for example, in ethereum or dollars.

[bagikoin]

Awhile ago I just commented to a thread that asks what if bounty hunters will get paid in ethereum. The fact that bounty hunters will like any altcoin as long as it has a big volume and accepted in almost every exchange.
That's what bounty hunters are asking for, when will the tokens shall be listed on exchange and with USDT. There will be no doubt that everyone will like it.

I agree with your thoughts. as long as the token already has a large volume and also, in this case, the price is already high enough and then there will be many who love and also joined. whether it's the USDT or even etehreum and another large volume altcoin, it will be a lot of interested because the results are clear and not like other paid token there are many at this time.

[Ociwiw]

I do not see anything wrong with bounty hunters paying in USDT, in my opinion this is also a worthy payment for bounty!

[Pithaxz]

Expectations are good, however, it is still difficult to expect this while the bounty hunter prefers the payment to be made using coins, but it turns out this also does not always pay. Because we know ico is not all good there is also a bad one. most important bounty hunters have a sale value on the exchange.

[agusiska]

personally im agree with this idea, but if this happen, it can make bad impact of token itself, because they credit the bounty participant with their own token for reason to help their circulating token itself.

[panjay]

of course, who doesn't want to get payment from a "stable currency"?

the question is, do they want to actually give out some of their funds? like real funds, not the tokens they created. I think most of ICO don't do that, they give their own tokens because it's more "affordable". But yeah some ICO from korea do the payment with USDT i think?