I got Tag after I was untag !

[matico]

I have done nothing wrong neither have I go against the rule of the forum, Why does it please Lauda to red tag me for just no reason!

[owlcatz]

You've had that tag almost a year and now you're pissed about it? lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2502431.msg25592651#msg25592651

You exhibited scammy behaviour. Get over it....

[matico]

You've had that tag almost a year and now you're pissed about it? lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2502431.msg25592651#msg25592651

You exhibited scammy behaviour. Get over it....

Yes, I was unjustly tagged by Lauda using a new account accusation  as basis for giving me red trust. The accuser said I took part in thread bumping service which I never paticipated in and in any case does not deserve red trust! actmyname untag me because of lack of credible evidence in November last year and now I 'm tagged again by Lauda! What is wrong with Lauda and his stooge!

[owlcatz]

You've had that tag almost a year and now you're pissed about it? lol

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2502431.msg25592651#msg25592651

You exhibited scammy behaviour. Get over it....

Yes, I was unjustly tagged by Lauda using a new account accusation  as basis for giving me red trust. The accuser said I took part in thread bumping service which I never paticipated in and in any case does not deserve red trust! actmyname untag me because of lack of credible evidence in November last year and now I 'm tagged again by Lauda! What is wrong with Lauda and his stooge!

PM Lauda about it then? We can't help you. You can start by being nicer.

[LTU_btc]

Oh dude, you wasn't un-tagged. You always had red tag since January of 2018, it just was shown as "Untrusted feedback" because Lauda was out of DT. Now Lauda is back to DT and feedback left by Lauda now affects your trust score.
And you got red tag not without reason. Reason is shown in reference. But you are free to prove that you aren't involved in ICO bumping services and you're tagged without any reason.

[matico]

Well, I am not going to push this, I initially thought the forum was been sanitized and Justice and equity back on the forum, I was wrong! People of pure mind and progressive ideas will not bother themselves with petty things! Good luck to Launda with his negative feedback career! I am done here!

[suchmoon]

I am done here!

Translation: I'd rather quietly switch to another alt than risk it being exposed by continuing this thread.

You one-liner sigshitposting cockroaches are never "done".

[coinlocket$]

I am done here!

Translation: I'd rather quietly switch to another alt than risk it being exposed by continuing this thread.

You one-liner sigshitposting cockroaches are never "done".

What's looks like his alt seems tagged for the same reason.

Matico uses

Code:

0x9DB6af535a7E85cbfA59C4D552998E83405b0a73

http://archive.fo/o3rqm#selection-1809.20-1809.63

#Proof of Authentication

 Bitcointalk Username: matico
Telegram username: @onusm
ETH wallet address: 0x9DB6af535a7E85cbfA59C4D552998E83405b0a73
Campaign: Signature campaign

From here https://etherscan.io/address/0x9db6af535a7e85cbfa59c4d552998e83405b0a73#tokentxns

we can fine a lot of transactions with

Code:

0x83b466e639f48cd34c56c787f3e7da8e2a437d2c

https://etherscan.io/tokentxns?a=0x83b466e639f48cd34c56c787f3e7da8e2a437d2c&p=1



This leads us with 2 "random" consecutive posts

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2540835.msg27037521#msg27037521 Archivied: http://archive.fo/fcvY2#selection-5885.0-5885.6



This leads us to bamb

Tagged for the same reason.

[morvillz7z]

There are more accounts connected here even though I ain't no ETH transactions expert. What I found:

matico and clarkt

#Proof of Authentication

 Bitcointalk Username: matico
Telegram username: @onusm
ETH wallet address: 0x9DB6af535a7E85cbfA59C4D552998E83405b0a73
Campaign: Signature campaign

archive

Bitcointalk username:clarkt
Account URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1178800
Rank: Member
Starting post Count: 98
Date of Join:  04/12/2017
Ether address:0x9DB6af535a7E85cbfA59C4D552998E83405b0a73

archive


clarkt, babsjoe and karthcrypt

Bitcointalk account URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1178800
Bitcointalk username: clarkt
Forum rank: Member
Starting post count: 136
ETH Address: 0x1A4A0D14fA2619b203800E2b1ff414cD112b053F

archive

Hello Dev! I joined the telegram as you adviced.
My telegram name: Kelvin
My Ethereum Address: 0x1A4A0D14fA2619b203800E2b1ff414cD112b053F

archive

#Proof of Authentication

Telegram Username: @purplegrey
ETH: 0x1A4A0D14fA2619b203800E2b1ff414cD112b053F

archive


clarkt, otundebis and vinbentrob

#Proofauthentication
Signature  Bounty Campaign
Bitcointalk Username: clarkt
Bitcointalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1178800
Telegram Username: @purplegrey

archive

#Proof of Authentication
Bitcointalk Username: otundebis
Telegram username - @purplegrey
Campaign : Signature

archive

Proof of Authentication Post
Telegram: @purplegrey

archive


clarkt, vinbentrob and babsjoe

Username : clarkt
Profile Link : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1178800;sa=forumProfile
Post Count : 134
Rank :Member
Ethereum Address : 0xd6c2C4F76292d7085c88782E4f2AFD535054ad46

archive

#Proof of Authentication

Telegram Username: @onusm
Eth:
0xd6c2C4F76292d7085c88782E4f2AFD535054ad46

archive

#JOIN

Bitcointalk username: babsjoe
Forum rank: Junior rank
Post count: 59
ETH address: 0xd6c2C4F76292d7085c88782E4f2AFD535054ad46

archive


matico, bamb (as coinlocket$ already pointed out) and karthcrypt

#Proof of Authentication

 Bitcointalk Username:matico
Telegram username: @onusm
ETH wallet address: 0x9DB6af535a7E85cbfA59C4D552998E83405b0a73
Campaign: Signature campaign

archive

#Proof of authentication post
@onusm  joined: Signature Campaign
Bounty My account link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=339386  

archive

Proof of Authentication Post
Telegram: @onusm

archive

[suchmoon]

There are more accounts connected

Pure magic. I just guessed and boom there's proof. Now need to figure out which ones need a tag perhaps.

[Lauda]

There are more accounts connected here even though I ain't no ETH transactions expert. What I found:
-snip-

Good work. Tagged all of them. It's no surprise that someone willing to provide bumping services controls multiple shitposting accounts.

[morvillz7z]

I checked matico's recent posts looking for plagiarism due to some purposely made spelling mistakes but I couldn't find anything.
Then I noticed that posts were made 2- 4 minutes apart (something I had seen in other signature spamming farms).

Maybe coinlocket$ can look into those transactions and discover even more connected accounts. There are always more...

[coinlocket$]

I checked matico's recent posts looking for plagiarism due to some purposely made spelling mistakes but I couldn't find anything.
Then I noticed that posts were made 2- 4 minutes apart (something I had seen in other signature spamming farms).

Maybe coinlocket$ can look into those transactions and discover even more connected accounts. There are always more...

Noticed the same typos we need to @veleor here for plagiarism.
Looking on signature of matico is hard, are handled on 3rd part bounties website so spreadsheets are not avaiable.

[morvillz7z]

Looking on signature of matico is hard, are handled on 3rd part bounties website so spreadsheets are not avaiable.

That's too bad.

Anyway, I found one more full member account - Kunlejoe0 which is currently advertising that Ethereum Classic Vision scam.

Proof of Authentication Post
Telegram: @turnyou

#Proof of authentication post
telegram: @turnyou

Joined telegram  bounty campaign

#Proof of authentication

Bitcointalk username: matico
Telegram username:  @turnyou

Bitcointalk username: matico
Facebook post:  https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1790751267633091&id=100000947050623&_rdr
Facebook account: https://facebook.com/mayobami2
Facebook friends/followers: 1505
Telegram username: @turnyou
Bitcoin address: 1F5owJKY5smqu88U8zfwcbEHRp57b3nxD9

Archived : 1, 2, 3, and 4

[actmyname]

matico mentioned something about me.

To extend my piece of the opinion pie, I found it difficult to justify tagging someone based on hearsay evidence. The ICO bumping included direct PM's and substantiated alt-account propositions, yes. There however was also a user that propagated a large list of users and matico was a part thereof.

Without any further evidence, it's inconclusive. Yes, it's likely that the users are involved however who is to say that the sender of the PM was not padding the message with "extra" participants that they chose randomly? That's why I had doubts when reviewing Lauda's tags.

Not anymore, though.

[morvillz7z]

The aforementioned users have likely ranked up two more accounts, abusing the merit system (as you can see in the images below).

yountt2 and otunyot