ETF is surely a big thing to expect in the effort to kick start mass adoption of cryptocurrency. Yet, in packaging these proposals, I think the guys that put up the proposals just do it for the sake of proposal. If not, how can more than 5 different submissions fail the same hurdle, the SEC?
The reason given by SEC? The market is prone to manipulation.
I would agree with what others have said, it doesn't matter how good the proposal is in paper, it will eventually rejected by SEC. Everyone who has been following this news, specially after the first Winklevoss proposal rejection in early 2017, that it will be a big mountain to climb to get that approval.
We might as well move forward and totally forget about it, we have survived the first 10 years without any ETF's so I will assume that we can go and continue without them in the first decade as well.