So how many of those "Air Drop" wallets will actually belong to the devs and how can you prove they don't?
If the dev would turn over control of the premine to a trusted third party and remove himself from the premine, then it would have a possibility of not being a premine laundering scheme.
But since the dev has refused to do so, the intent is crystal clear no matter how much obscenity you use!
~BCX~
Ok, for one more time I will respectfully try sir: (sigh)
I agree 100% with you that having a trusted third party controlling the airdrop would help a lot to support trust to this campaign. But then comes the logical question:
Who is going to be this third party?I don't think it can be an escrow from this forum. As I stated before, where lies the trust in a forum member that has a fictive name and says in his profile he is a 12 year old girl?
So, it obviously needs to be a well respected openly and publicly known member of real society. Even if we can find such a person willing to take up the burden, it will be a bad choice. Why? Because the pre mined coins can then be easily seized by Government, banks or criminals. It's like proving the Gold in Fort Knox really exists by transferring it to the central square garden and letting the entire world know they can see it for themselves. Good luck safeguarding that!So that's why it is perfectly logical to me that Dev doesn't use third party and keeps anonymous until the airdrop has been put into motion. I am one of few who has actual insight in the plan and have no doubt it will work perfectly, also in a way all transfers from pre mined addresses actually transparently get to the Icelandic people.
Again, to be absolutely sure no one can try to manipulate or hack the process, for the same reasons it is logical that the exact details of the plan remain undisclosed up to shortly before airdrop commences.
