What happens to unshared bounty tokens?

[Herdirfauzi]

Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?

In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.

This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?

I think if in a project there is a screening of participants who pass KYC, multi accounts, preferably the rest of the tokens are redistributed to participants who are loyal and fulfill all their rules.

[ropyu1978]

Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?

In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.

This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?

this of course depends on who shares the tokens, of course, for most managers submit spreadsheets to the ico team, and most of the ico teams share them. except for a few managers who are given full rights to it.
it's possible that the manager will have the token

[Little Mouse]

Those stakes are also counted for the bounty hunters who are eligible, if not, then developer burns those coins. This is not a matter which we think about. Most of the times, there is a total allocation and those are distributed as per stakes.

[motun01]

Bounty distribution is either done by stakes or tokens.
In the case of stakes, the total application will be shared irrespective of how many hunters  participate in the campaign.
In the case of tokens there will most likely be tokens left that isn't distributed and that will likely return to the team for the project development.

[Sundaey]

And do see bounty campaign not sharing all the token allocated for the bounty, I think no. They will find a way to solve that since they are most calculate on percent and each campaign share the percentage allocate to them.

[Kang Bahar]

From my experience, undistributed tokens from bounty campaigns were either considered as unsold tokens and burned or they were returned to reserves.

Yep. Besides that, unshared bounty tokens can be shared with the bounty management team who are willing to accept payment using token from the related project. CMIIW~

[akuser]

Tokens are not burned, but distributed to other teams. tokens that are burned are unsold tokens.
usually prices will change but now this debate is not important because the bounty even postpones payments or delays exchanges.

[cryptocyprus]

And I never thought about this topic, because I participated only in bounty companies, when first they check everything and only then they put the shares and the number of tokens.

[MAUTMALAIKAT]

Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?

In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.

This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?

Some bounties certainly have their own rules regarding the tokens they will share. If filtering occurs, of course they have a reason to do that. Because more fraudulent bounty users are increasing and participants don't understand what the other participants will overwrite at all. An unallocated bounty token issue might be retrieved by the bounty owner.

[temilade200]

This is a very interesting topic to discuss, because it has been my concern since i started discovering bounty campaigns with leftovers.
Sometimes, the determinant might be the agreement between the bounty manager and the team.
If the team of the project hands over the distribution to the bounty manager, then he has all the authority to decide on what to do.
The same thing is also applicable to the team.

[nebuch]

Expectations does not mean to happen due to some reasons such us unknown persons behind the project, market turns to red, natural calamities, unwanted result of the campaign. The unshared bounty token would be use for another round or maybe burned. The power to change the rules is in the hands of the admin passed to the hands of manager.

[donadoni212]

Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?

In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.

This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?

Yes, your opinion is good. which I know the remaining tokens will be burned so that the value of 1 token will be more stable. the existence of regulations will have a positive impact on participants participating in the campaign.

[elite070]

Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?

In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.

This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?

What? those who didn't buy when the ICO phase runs out? Some putted it into the liquidity pool if they are an exchange project and some burns it for fairness and goodness of the project.

[Mysteryla]

The team of the project most times device on what to do to tokens that are not distributed due to one reason or the other.
Sometimes, the tokens are added to those in reserve, which will be used for the growth of the ecosystem, such as using it for more partnerships.
In some situations, they are burnt.
There are times that they are used for more campaigns.

[Plecet Bank]

For tokens that are not shared, of course, there are various considerations. As market conditions collapse, shipping costs are still expensive and can even be a project that is fraud. It all depends on how we determine the Bounty project we must be more careful.

[daporivera]

From what I know, unshared tokens are always burnt. Heard people talk about bounty managers and the team behind the project  sharing up the left over token.  Presently, can't verify how true that is.

[chanler]

I have ever faced this condition for several times. I didn't get the bounty because missing to pass the KYC progress that needs more than one step. Commonly I have passed the first KYC process, but in fact there was an additional form to fulfill and I missed it. I got nothing after work for 3 months. This is so sad. But i cannot do anything.

[freya louis]

Have you ever asked yourself this question?
What happens to unallocated bounty tokens?
There have been several bounty campaigns where some participants do not qualify after being screened, such as those who fail to pass the kyc due to multiple accounts or other reasons, detected bots or cheaters who use other people's details.
Most times, stakes would have been calculated and tokens allocated on the spreadsheet to be submitted for distribution, before the screening process is completed. Which then means that some tokens will be left undistributed.
Where do these tokens then go to?

In my opinion, in order to reward the faithful and sincere hunters, I want to suggest that all the screening should first be completed, before stakes are calculated and prior to allocation of tokens to bounty participants.
So stakes should not be calculated for cheaters.

This is just my opinion, it is opened to discussion.
What do you think?

Yes, it is not uncommon for us to find such a bounty. Unmarked tokens may be stock for investors. For them, there are certainly many places to allocate these tokens. So let those who handle them know better than us. But if we get cheating in the bounty it is obligatory to criticize.

[jacafbiz]

I don't know why people are concerned about the unshared bounty tokens as long as the manager paid your own tokens in full, trying to probe into in this unshared tokens do not make sense to me, this is left to the discretion of the team to use it for what they like since they have fulfilled their own commitment to you

[starblocks]

This is a bit of a gray area and is not ordinarily stipulated in the terms and conditions of each campaign however, most projects that are transparent will either re-allocate the tokens to the approved participants or burn the tokens with the unsold amount but this isn't always the case