i talk about many things. you and your buddies just drop in to poke when developers are mentioned.
But you have to admit, it's funny how you never talk about the part where non-mining full nodes and miners are equally culpable in making the network what it is today. It's almost as though you don't understand how Bitcoin works at all and somehow genuinely believe that devs make all the decisions. You couldn't possibly be
that uneducated, though, surely?
If or when those securing the chain desire more throughput, then (and only then) will it happen. Your incessant whining about devs won't expedite it. Full nodes and miners are the ones who are free to choose what level of burden they are prepared to carry. It appears as though they're comfortable with what we have now. There have been an ample number of opportunities for people to run code supporting larger blocks over the years. But, for the most part, people are sticking with our present route.
But sure, whatever, you keep blaming the people who wrote the code instead of the people who are running it. It's bound to work one day.
oh here goes doomad meandering the topic way off topic... he pokes the bear so lets bite.
firstly i talk about alot of things. but i talk about the deeper stuff. and the cause/effect
its not like there is much code diversity to oppose/object to/counter the roadmap.
and when there is, the roadmap advocates do everything they can to push non roadmap off the network
i do understand how bitcoin works. more so than you. i also know what events actually occured. where as you deny they even happen.
you have been pushing hard to deny that august 1st 2017 happened. you have been pushing hard to deny the REKT campaigns even happened.
yet the developers have been happy to admit their actions. it is only you and your buddies who deny such events.
so spend less time on your social drama. and spend more time researching, and maybe you will learn what bitcoin is really about and what actually occurred.
the reason developers are to blame more so than users is this.
1. developers develop the code.. users dont.
2. developers put code in to bypass peoples wishes (mandated bypasses, inflight upgrades)
3. users dont get as much of a decision if they are always treated as "compatible" and dont get a opt-in or opt-out. it just changes without choice.
4. when there is a choice lately its not a if opt-out it dont happen. but more so if opt-out your thrown off the network to fake a vote of acceptance
so like before its you that needs to decide ar you a flip or a flop.
because some days you pretend users get a vote/choice. and others your anti-vote mindset shouts that people dont get a vote.
its you that does not understand the issues and how bitcoin had/should function vs how it has been run lately
so spend less time replying and more time researching until you yourself can stick to a rhetoric that atleast matches data found on the blockchain
...
any way
sorry folks doomad does that alot.
hopefully he doesnt reply and spends the time to learn more about bitcoin. but i expect he prefers to keep replying and now derail this topic.. and then play the victim