alicex
|
|
March 14, 2014, 07:44:56 AM |
|
any difference? nothing but clone
|
|
|
|
lj2012
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
March 14, 2014, 10:48:01 PM |
|
I want to know where to download windows wallet
|
|
|
|
kksam
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
March 15, 2014, 01:31:46 AM |
|
I want to know where to download windows wallet too
|
|
|
|
RV1969
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:43:27 PM |
|
@okaypool: Please change "frist" to "first", Thank you!
We also noticed your notice on tet.okaypool.com. We can only guess that it is related to getting the blockchain. This will be true if you are getting orphans as indicated in your logs. The second sign of this issue is that the blocks listed when using tetcoind getinfo remains constant at 3. If that is so, please follow these simple steps to get the blockchain:
1. Stop tetcoind 2. Go to the .tetcoin directory specific to your install 3. Remove everything except tetcoin.conf and wallet.dat 4. When starting tetcoind, add -connect=76.74.178.193 to the string used to start the program.
Currently, the Tetcoin package is a prerelease. The DNS Seed Servers are in development and are not ready for a production environment. The presented resolution will work for most users until the related seed servers are active. If you are in a virtualized environment, you may have to tunnel or forward port 8888 from tetcoin.com to the correlating instance and connect internally.
@Okaypool: Please fix so I can withdraw some TET. Balance is incorrect now. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
RV1969
|
|
March 21, 2014, 10:01:43 AM |
|
Trying to gain access to my TET. Sent PM to Okaypool a few days ago.Just resent it through the contact form. No reply yet...
Hi,
regarding tet.okaypool.com:
My username is RV1969.
PIN retrieval via e-mail does not work. I am in control of our corporate spam filters and I can see it's not even arriving there.
May I ask you to
- send my PIN to my registered address (-edited-) - make my balance available for withdrawal (approximately 270000TET) to TKSiiuepWbj6xvSPmpspUkg6g3rWRYLDNE
If you choose to set this manually, please subtract a donation amount of 1.5%.
Kind regards,
-edited-
|
|
|
|
|
e1ghtSpace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
Crypto since 2014
|
|
April 09, 2014, 01:29:17 AM |
|
Yay, mining some blocks, have 512 coins so far.
|
|
|
|
ECF
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
April 21, 2014, 03:24:01 PM |
|
http://www.ecoinfund.com/images/logo.jpgWebsite | Twitter | BitcointalkHi,TET Community We have added TET to ECOINFUND voting pool.( http://www.ecoinfund.com/vote) Multi-language Alt-Coin Exchange,Fast, Secure and Trustworthy. Big ECC GIVEAWAY before 30.AprilTweet this green text on your own twitter account then recive 50ECC( ECC Details); ecoinfund.com |New Exchange,multi-language support,Earn 50ECC(fee shares) by every retweet before 30 April,don't miss the train! Pls post your twitter link and Ecoinfund ID on our bitcointalk thread or pm us. ECF Coin (ECC for short) is the fee share program launched by Ecoinfund. Ecoinfund will commit 50% of trade revenue to ECC program. (highest on market) Giveaway more infomation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=501030.0Happy trading !
|
|
|
|
jdh015232
|
|
April 21, 2014, 06:29:50 PM |
|
no inovation bitcoin copy doesnt even mention if theirs a premine or anything good luck with this one noobies
|
|
|
|
TheMightyX
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Vires in Numeris
|
|
April 24, 2014, 04:22:40 PM |
|
So, no information on premine or future plans of any kind?
STOP SUPPORTING CRAP
You all are just weakening the community by diverting hashing power away from more deserving and innovative coins.
By lowering the hashrate of other coins you are increasing the amount of coins that goes to each miner, which encourages dumping. 90% of all coins are losing value FOR THIS VERY REASON.
You fucking chumps want to make some money? Then stop jumping from coin to coin. Pick the good ones and stick with them! By supporting every piece of shit coin that comes out without using your brain you are losing money for everyone!
|
|
|
|
shai_
|
|
April 25, 2014, 04:47:15 AM |
|
1 Tetcoin for 10$ ?! pffft on this low difficulty you must be making millions
|
|
|
|
zxm7001
|
|
May 01, 2014, 11:34:20 AM |
|
Website | Twitter | BitcointalkHi,TETcoin Community Big ECFC GIVEAWAY before 10.MayTweet this green text on your own twitter account then recive 20 ECFC; ecoinfund.com |New Exchange,multi-language support,Earn 20 ECFC(fee shares) by every retweet before 10 May,don't miss the train! Pls post your twitter link and Ecoinfund ID on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=501030.0 ,you will get 20 ECFC! Happy trading ! TETcoin get 390 votes,over 1000 will list on the market!
|
|
|
|
askcoin2
|
|
November 11, 2014, 03:38:48 PM |
|
Added market TET/BTC. Happy Trading!
|
|
|
|
SalimNagamato
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 23, 2014, 06:34:38 AM |
|
Error! Can't connect to tetcoind to get live updates from the p2p network. (Tried connecting to tetcoind at 127.0.0.1:8888 and failed.)
|
not hashing, folding and curing (check FLDC merged-folding! reuse good GPUs)
|
|
|
tuaris
|
|
January 02, 2015, 09:34:33 AM Last edit: January 02, 2015, 10:06:30 AM by tuaris |
|
There seem to be two block chains.
|
|
|
|
tuaris
|
|
January 02, 2015, 10:46:17 AM |
|
Appears that it forked at Block #64615
|
|
|
|
tuaris
|
|
January 02, 2015, 11:52:35 AM |
|
Looks like there are several forks. The developer needs to add a check point to the codebase.
Block #70,000 should be: 48c1ea33b1b3fcdf599b8fb7438ce73263ac7d4c6195812ecc5678b24da78696
|
|
|
|
SeymourSkinner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2015, 12:00:45 PM |
|
Is the giveaway still active?
|
|
|
|
tuaris
|
|
January 02, 2015, 12:09:27 PM |
|
Is the giveaway still active?
Not sure, but something does not seem right about this coin. Looks like the consensus was quietly changed at some point or someone is doing something nasty. 2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : hash doesn't match nBits 2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: CheckBlock() : proof of work failed 2015-01-02 11:26:20 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
Just look at all these nodes with different chain heights: Array ( [0] => Array ( [addr] => 85.25.196.115:14333 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200490 [lastrecv] => 1420200260 [bytessent] => 5218573 [bytesrecv] => 775772 [blocksrequested] => 6757 [conntime] => 1419916221 [version] => 70002 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.1/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 17544 [banscore] => 0 )
[1] => Array ( [addr] => 75.129.82.163:9333 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200474 [lastrecv] => 1420200474 [bytessent] => 2307139 [bytesrecv] => 4850800 [blocksrequested] => 0 [conntime] => 1419996092 [version] => 70002 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.7.2/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 703580 [banscore] => 0 [syncnode] => 1 )
[2] => Array ( [addr] => 107.170.170.56:7559 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200493 [lastrecv] => 1420200478 [bytessent] => 472003 [bytesrecv] => 154702 [blocksrequested] => 1 [conntime] => 1420111408 [version] => 70002 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.9.2/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 164223 [banscore] => 0 )
[3] => Array ( [addr] => 148.100.32.54:9027 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200462 [lastrecv] => 1420200289 [bytessent] => 1479040 [bytesrecv] => 270202 [blocksrequested] => 2217 [conntime] => 1420114678 [version] => 70003 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 47082 [banscore] => 10 )
[4] => Array ( [addr] => 193.109.128.156:9333 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200399 [lastrecv] => 1420200168 [bytessent] => 1358582 [bytesrecv] => 250503 [blocksrequested] => 2237 [conntime] => 1420121323 [version] => 70002 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.7.4/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 0 [banscore] => 0 )
[5] => Array ( [addr] => 2.121.15.15:9333 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200493 [lastrecv] => 1420200397 [bytessent] => 114369 [bytesrecv] => 105387 [blocksrequested] => 0 [conntime] => 1420171564 [version] => 70002 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 580787 [banscore] => 0 )
[6] => Array ( [addr] => 91.226.172.8:9333 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200490 [lastrecv] => 1420200492 [bytessent] => 12797 [bytesrecv] => 78721 [blocksrequested] => 0 [conntime] => 1420189381 [version] => 70002 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.8.6.2/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 682986 [banscore] => 0 )
[7] => Array ( [addr] => 54.178.177.173:9999 [services] => 00000003 [lastsend] => 1420200481 [lastrecv] => 1420200490 [bytessent] => 2594 [bytesrecv] => 77076 [blocksrequested] => 0 [conntime] => 1420194556 [version] => 70002 [subver] => /Satoshi:0.9.1.2/ [inbound] => [startingheight] => 75201 [banscore] => 0 )
)
The developer really needs to fix this by creating a new check point at block 70,000 with block hash: 48c1ea33b1b3fcdf599b8fb7438ce73263ac7d4c6195812ecc5678b24da78696
|
|
|
|
SeymourSkinner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
January 02, 2015, 12:16:25 PM |
|
Just look at all these nodes with different chain heights:
Where do I look? Startingheight?
|
|
|
|
|