Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 09:05:27 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What do you think Litecoin price will be five years from now?
0 - 20 (19.2%)
<= 0.003 BTC - 18 (17.3%)
~ 0.01 BTC - 13 (12.5%)
>= 0.03 BTC - 15 (14.4%)
>= 0.25 BTC - 38 (36.5%)
Total Voters: 104

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [POLL] - What is the ultimate price of Litecoin?  (Read 4715 times)
jjiimm_64
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000


View Profile
November 10, 2011, 05:04:16 AM
 #21


because of the faster confirmations of litecoin, it may be adopted easier for purchases

1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715375127
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715375127

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715375127
Reply with quote  #2

1715375127
Report to moderator
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
November 10, 2011, 05:23:56 AM
 #22

Doubtful.  I thought the point of Litecoin was for small purchases.  No need for confirmation is small purchases.  A non-finney double spend is essentially impossible to pull off if the seller simply waits 60 seconds or so.

A seller accepting 0-confirm sales is vulnerable to a Finney attack but given the staggering amount of hashing power required to even attempt that nobody is going to spend $80,000 to build a hashing farm to double spend a 1BTC copy of angry birds.
Spacy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 10, 2011, 10:25:41 PM
 #23

A seller accepting 0-confirm sales is vulnerable to a Finney attack but given the staggering amount of hashing power required to even attempt that nobody is going to spend $80,000 to build a hashing farm to double spend a 1BTC copy of angry birds.

No, but they will transfer hundreds of thousands of LTC into exchanges, sell it and withdraw, then rewrite the chain. But true, it's not worth for small business amounts to wait hours for lot of confirmations.
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
November 10, 2011, 10:34:06 PM
 #24

A seller accepting 0-confirm sales is vulnerable to a Finney attack but given the staggering amount of hashing power required to even attempt that nobody is going to spend $80,000 to build a hashing farm to double spend a 1BTC copy of angry birds.

No, but they will transfer hundreds of thousands of LTC into exchanges, sell it and withdraw, then rewrite the chain. But true, it's not worth for small business amounts to wait hours for lot of confirmations.

Right which is why no exchange allows you to withdraw until you have 1 (possibly more) confirmations.

Really the only transactions which are vulnerable to Finney attack are
a) very large in value
b) irrevocable and instantaneous.
c) doesn't require 1 confirmation.

I don't know of any transaction like that which exists.  A business just need to evaluate their risks.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!