~
Much of these necessary steps are due to the fact that we still do not have a world where cryptos are widely used. So one of the goals of this charity would be to prove useful to them.
You should read again the text.
They didn't use cryptos for anything other than identification.
On January 22, the 72 household heads gathered at the district center. They used their crypto accounts to get much-needed aid from donation suppliers, with the help of the five trainers alongside staff from Binance Charity and CSF.
They just received the money in their binance accounts, the staff exchanged the money for goods and delivered them.
The whole crypto step was just an unnecessary publicity stunt.
I agree with helping people, but if you do it, do without all this charade.
I think Binance's big mistake was to use computers. Smartphones are much simpler and more practical to use. And they are already widely used even in very poor regions.
According to this report, more than 50% of the population has a cell phone. And 16% have a smatphone. I can not understand why companies related to cryptos still focus so much on computers at the expense of smartphones.
Look where that village is and how the area looks like, I doubt you get data transfer there.
Secondary, from the article you posted, it clearly says that the price of a phone is prohibitive for 1/3 of the population.
I have a feeling that the people living in a village with no roads, no doors or windows in all the houses in the pics are able to afford one.