Bounty managers cheat content creators

[herurist]

Seriously I ve a problem with bounty managers who reject articles on the basis of 'low audience'. Because blog writing is the only campaign whose stakes are awarded subjectively, bounty managers try to cheat those participants.
You will agree with me that no one can force someone to upvote or comment on his or her blog after reading.
Comments and upvotes should be a plus for extra stakes. Those with original contents with little or no audience should be given at least something little for their efforts and not just awarding 0 stakes because reading a white paper and coming out with something unique in order to attract investors is not something easy. I hope some bounty managers will hear me out

I think you should complaint with the manager, I believe there's solutions for your problem. If not and you're right just share with us so in future if he/ she become bounty manager we will take more attention with him. As long you can proof that you're right people will support you, so don't be afraid just go for it.

[1715552385]

1715552385

[1715552385]

1715552385

[1715552385]

1715552385

[1715552385]

1715552385

[jimskiy]

I have the same opinion with you where many bounty managers cheat our content and make by himself, how many bounty campaign manager not allowed for all investor joined content campaign and they only give for special participants and joined by himself.

[residivis]

I think you are wrong if you say / make a thread like this and this will usually hurt you. You have to say clearly who the bounty manager is doing that and explain the proof.

[rijaljun]

I feel sorry to hear that bounty manager try to cheat participants. But, if you find this kind of manager, you can ask him/her why and price your originality. I'm sure they can understand and will try to re-check your publications.

[florac9]

I don't join bounties with rules ,they are pain in the ass please learn from me ,though bounty managers do cheat but not all of them ,find the ones that stay true to there words and have no stupid rules

[JuggSlash]

Nowadays, content is the biggest effort. So, you can try to make more and more content so you can get maximum quality of the content.

[Bitbtc8]

Sorry to hear ,there are still many good bounty managers on here that cares more about bounty hunters ,they make sure that all participants get fair reward ,all you have to do is take your time to find good bounty managers and stay away from bounties with rules of adjusting bounty rules anytime ,sometimes they even later forced KYC on participants at the end of bounty campaign

[Little Mouse]

Not so agreed with you. If you write a decent article, you will likely to get some boost. You should get some views or upvotes. Also, you can try to share your article on some of the social platform with some good related hashtags which may give you some views. Campaign managers do not cheat in this aspect.

[nreal]

I agree with your point of view, I have seen some bounty managers, the first time they censor the article is very serious, but when the campaign is nearing the end of a large number of posts are added, they are of quality low even not obeying rules but still able to get stake

[Nurma.A]

basically, there is nothing that can force other people to comment/like/upvote our articles, but that won't happen if your article is good. I often see articles from other people who get likes/upvote/comments. because they made a very good article. so they get it.

[Little Mouse]

I also want to say you that it depends on campaign manager. You should not join a campaign from an unreputed manager. Follow some of the best campaign managers like- Hhampuz, Julerz, Yahoo and some more. Then you can expect honesty.

[Lassie]

Seriously I ve a problem with bounty managers who reject articles on the basis of 'low audience'. Because blog writing is the only campaign whose stakes are awarded subjectively, bounty managers try to cheat those participants.
You will agree with me that no one can force someone to upvote or comment on his or her blog after reading.
Comments and upvotes should be a plus for extra stakes. Those with original contents with little or no audience should be given at least something little for their efforts and not just awarding 0 stakes because reading a white paper and coming out with something unique in order to attract investors is not something easy. I hope some bounty managers will hear me out

There are rules in the bounty thread about the stakes and you should read it carefully before applying or joining content creation campaign. If you are a bounty manager/project team member would you like to pay for contents that doesn't actually helped your project raise awareness?

[BADBITCH]

Seriously I ve a problem with bounty managers who reject articles on the basis of 'low audience'. Because blog writing is the only campaign whose stakes are awarded subjectively, bounty managers try to cheat those participants.
You will agree with me that no one can force someone to upvote or comment on his or her blog after reading.
Comments and upvotes should be a plus for extra stakes. Those with original contents with little or no audience should be given at least something little for their efforts and not just awarding 0 stakes because reading a white paper and coming out with something unique in order to attract investors is not something easy. I hope some bounty managers will hear me out

I think there’s no need to be harsh or upset about certain bounty manager attitude regarding content creation
Some hunters used spin bot or article spinner to cause plagiarism and it is very tiring for bounty Manager’s

But does the articles bounty hunters write really help the project make sales ? I don’t believe so

[overnight03]

Seriously I ve a problem with bounty managers who reject articles on the basis of 'low audience'. Because blog writing is the only campaign whose stakes are awarded subjectively, bounty managers try to cheat those participants.
You will agree with me that no one can force someone to upvote or comment on his or her blog after reading.
Comments and upvotes should be a plus for extra stakes. Those with original contents with little or no audience should be given at least something little for their efforts and not just awarding 0 stakes because reading a white paper and coming out with something unique in order to attract investors is not something easy. I hope some bounty managers will hear me out

You should read clearly the rules of the bounty program before joining, I have encountered many cases like you because I don't read it carefully !! That will be an experience for you later

[ChiNgadOr]

Content campaigns are always very well paid, but the subjective component is a serious handicap.. plus there you need to guarantee organic views in order to receive reward for the work. So is a risk. Anyway, i have seen so many many many reviews/videos, that would be a shame to me delivering that kind of trash.. Bounty manager should take a close look at every content posted and be more selective when assigning rewards

[Tramle091296]

All Bounty Managers has a clear rules for competing on the bounty. if your current bounty campaign has a rule that it need an audience or your saying upvote and comment well even it was an amazing article you need to obey the rules and you must follow it. if you want to avoid it or prevent on wasting your effort pick a bounty campaign that dont need upvote or like, and focusing the contents of every articles.

[Bravext]

I personally do not think that it should be called cheating when bounty managers give some people nothing for having low audience, we tend to forget that bounty campaigns especially content creation are not for creativity same mostly, they are mainly for marketing purposes and when they do not reach much audience, no matter how original the article is, it is basically useless because nobody or very few people read it.

[Chemcrier]

This is something I find disturbing as well, why demand for unique articles if all you wanted was a large audience? We could have just reposted one of their articles to our blog that had many audience and claim the points, I do not like this trend by bounty managers at all.

[Christinebeauty]

I think the originality and quality of the content should be paramount to the audience engagement because someone can just copy and paste some parts of the white paper and pay for some bots to upvote for them. While those who genuinely did a creative work won't get any pay.

[oudekaas]

Yeh, I had the same problem. But after that I improved my blog and it's all ok. Bounty managers also do their work and they are not interested in cheating. I think that you blog doesn't have the requirement amout of followers.