Distribution of tokens in installments

[rencong bitcoin]

I thought it was a new and exact method that the dev had done, it was anticipated that there would be no big sales, so the dev would be easier to stabilize prices, but I see the method only done on a few projects, I hope that done on all projects.

[martabaktelor]

With the condition of the Crypto market currently still very low. So that it can be a good solution to keep the price of tokens stable. Previously there was an ATLANT project that was distributed every month and is currently still running.

[CryptoBry]

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

The staggered distribution of the tokens that you earned is done of course in order to control the sale of the same with different exchanges (am assuming it is already available in the exchange) and can be because in our experience there is a strong possibility of dumping once the tokens are already in our hands. Though bounty hunters' holdings just comprise not more than 5% of the total available tokens still people behind a project can be afraid of strong dumping. Nowadays, the market is not getting very good for many ICO projects especially the new ones...and this is the reason why people are looking for something much better like the STO which many are demanding to replace the usual ICO.

[Abal Abal]

I have ever met, such a thing is done to measure the time, besides that the team did it to avoid a dramatic drop in prices.

[CryptoTech_]

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

if what you mean is a bounty distribution, I think that is one of the efforts of the dev to stabilize prices in the market
I also got a project like that, he distributed tokens every month for 18 months, but it cannot be relied upon to stabilize the price of tokens, because inevitably the price of tokens always goes down, especially in the current market conditions

[siena23]

Maybe it could be a solution so that the price of tokens does not go down. But it's better to just ask the project team what the purpose of the distribution is in stages. Maybe that includes the project team's plans or goals.

[RasenShuriken]

it's better than a coin whoever make the distribution in 4 months because they really wanted to make sure there will be no dumps on their tokens. You have to be grateful.

[Argoo]

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

I have not heard of such a new knowledge on the part of the ICO team. Of course, this may be logical in order not to devalue the new token. I even better agree that the ICO team immediately pays out all the tokens and then blocks it for 6-8 months. I would know that the tokens are in my wallet. And this is how much work, the number of transactions increases exactly ten times. Here they will surely confuse something, there will be many complaints. No, this is a bad way to depreciate the token, it is unlikely to take root.

[Darklinkz]

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

It's clearly decided for that reason.  But 10% or not, I don't think you can trade them for a lot of profit because almost the new listed coins has no volume at all and sellers dominate it and it just get dumped harder.

[rosezionjohn]

It is probably to prevent the bounty hunters from dumping. Many projects believe that hunters are responsible for selling at cheap prices and this method of paying in installment is their way to prevent that from happening. The team may have other reasons, you should ask them directly.

[Indrawan77]

Its one of the way for the developers to prevent a sudden huge drop, it's important to keep the value high especially when just launched on the exchanges, usually the developers will distribute the token in several waves, but this seems like a better way, but the developers need to pay attention to the length, if its too long I am sure the bounty hunters will complain

[Ociwiw]

It seems to me that projects are trying to test their tokens in action and see how they behave in the market!

[qomariah95]

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

I have also experienced this, the project was canceled not once a month but every 3 months it was distributed. This is actually the purpose of the project. But with this method actually I also do not agree because the bounty hunter also doesn't get much tokens from the project.

[Gabmot]

Well,  i don't see this as any huge difference,  however,  i think the only thing/opportunity this offers is an assurance of getting the due rewards after doing the work expected.

[babysweetTiger0401]

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

In that case, we really do nothing about it. But to accept, unlike they never give the payments, isn't right?
The reason of course why they made that decision is really to avoid dumping the price value of their token, probably they are afraid for that.
But even they don't apply it, the price will still get dump whether they like it or not, because this is trading business industry.

[Chibongvdg]

I think it's a good way to distribute coins. Just as Deeponion did during the period they conducted their bounty campaign / airdrop distribution. Every week Only 10% of the coins you can sell, when you exceed the limit, you will be removed from the whole campaign. In this way the extreme dump of their coins was avoided and the price went on high stage

[eann014]

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

Yes, it is also their way to stabilize the prices. It is still fine as long as you receive all your payment even if you receive it every month but of course we all know that it is still better to get all hard work at one-time payment, but we just need to just accept their rules.

[therhslv]

Why people think that bounty participants is the ones that dump the price . I can name so many projects where bounty distribution was made same time with ICO participants and price didn't even dump . And there is projects out there like Elysian who still didn't distribute bounty tokens , but price is already down 99% from ICO price =D

[Vit83]

Why people think that bounty participants is the ones that dump the price . I can name so many projects where bounty distribution was made same time with ICO participants and price didn't even dump . And there is projects out there like Elysian who still didn't distribute bounty tokens , but price is already down 99% from ICO price =D

This a myth that bounty hunters can dump the price) IMHO great projects will nly grow after reaching the market, because of demand of people who couldn't buy on the ICO. If project is bad, and ICO team doing strange things and late with the development this wouldn't help at all)

[mirawantirinjana]

I bet you are talking about LYFE project, based on the data that I gathered from the team and the participant. They did that in order to avoid any dumpage from the bounty hunters. but from the other side(bounty hunter point of view), they did this because they wanted to minimize the cost.
there are so many reasons why would they do that, logically speaking. If they wanted to stabilize the price, they could pay them(the hunters) with BTC or ETH directly. But they did not, does not that mean they did it on purpose?

finally, someone can guess it, yes I still think positively until now, I hope they make the right strategy to prevent falling prices at the current market situation.

Thank you for strengthening my confidence in the project.