What happened to my trust. Admins, help me please...

[Saint-loup]

So if you're not able to respect the first rule of this forum, I don't know why are you here?

You're not a moderator though. Report shitposts to moderators, let them deal with it.

"No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads."

That has nothing to do with his/her/it's trustworthyness unfortunately.

If you believe that account is an alt, you should tag it as an alt, not as a spammer.

I will not argue for hours because I hate that.
If you think it's the best way to do, it's ok for me, I leave you the responsibility of the case.

[LoyceV]

I'll throw in my 2 satoshis too: OP is a bounty spammer, but that seems to be accepted on the bounty boards. Even if it wouldn't be accepted, it's something Mods should handle, and not something that DT should tag.
Posting on the wrong board can happen to anyone if you use enough open tabs. Not moving it by yourself is dumb/spam, but still not a reason to tag it. I've reported 100 times more posts than I've tagged, which is how spam should be handled.

I was going to Merit OP for his post that's worth reading, until I read his first post was asking about Merit. I can't verify it though, after OP deleted many of his posts. I assume OP has more accounts, and uses them to spam bounties (just like many other or even all bounty spammers do), and I don't want to give OP a Jr. Member signature to spam with.

Can I ask you something, be honest. Why does someone who knows the word 'scoundrel' participate in social media bounties?

I was wondering this too, and it makes sense if OP has more accounts.

TL;DR I think this shouldn't be tagged.

[asche]

~snip~

Was going to say the exact same thing.

[mikeywith]

If you think it's the best way to do, it's ok for me, I leave you the responsibility of the case.

This is the mod's responsibility , all what we are somehow morally obligated to do is report these incidents , i understand that your intention is to reduce low quality content, but sadly your tag does not accomplish it, the user will still be able to post whatever they want in the ANN section and now even in Meta because of the tag he got.

you spent the time to read his posts and seems like you were fairly confident that he is a spammer, i think if you reported a few posts of his or if you happened to find plagiarized content and reported those to the mods, he would have been already banned .

having said that, i still stand to my opinion that while this user might deserve to be banned, he does not deserve a negative at all, simply because he is not a scammer but rather a spammer.

[TheBeardedBaby]

Seems like the bounty report posted in the french local board was the tipping point for Saint-loup.
I agree that those posts are quite annoying outside of the bounty section but surly they deserve way "better" treatment.

If it was me, I would remove my negative feedback and focus on the plagiarism, it's much better to get them banned completely.
Trust and feedback are for different occasions.  

[Saint-loup]

OK
Done.

[asche]

~snip~

This is a neutral review. He is expressing his opinion which he is entitled too based on the reference.

You won what you came here for, I wouldn't be pushing it.

Edit: also the review says "suspected".

I am myself convinced that you are an alt too.

[The Cryptovator]

Why Saint-loup feedback's not visible to me by default even he is on DT2 . I had not excluded him. His feedback's showing to me on untrusted feedback's. Am I missing something ?

It appears to me even when adding ;dt.

I can see also if add ;dt. But his feedback should visible by default to all member if did not exclude. Am I right ? So why not showing to me

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I will be deprived of awards, because of your comment.

You won't be, believe me.  No bounty manager is going to give one shit about a neutral left by a DT member.  If it ain't red, it ain't read. 

Told you this would be resolved in a (semi) satisfactory way.  Thanks for being reasonable, Saint-loup.

[asche]

Why Saint-loup feedback's not visible to me by default even he is on DT2 . I had not excluded him. His feedback's showing to me on untrusted feedback's. Am I missing something ?

Weird.
It appears to me even when adding ;dt.

[LoyceV]

I'll also delete my review. Please.

Are you trying to use your trust as a bargaining chip? You shouldn't have left retaliation feedback in the first place!

Note that your account is now under scrutiny, don't break forum rules

[suchmoon]

I can see also if add ;dt. But his feedback should visible by default to all member if did not exclude. Am I right ? So why not showing to me

What's your depth setting? If it's 1 you're not going to see DT2.

[TheBeardedBaby]

I think it's time for this thread to be locked.

We gonna keep an eye on you SvetaIvanova, low quality posters are allowed here but will be monitored.
Feel sorry for Saint-loup, I know exactly how he feels but sometimes, life give us lemons...
Hope the lesson is learned, the trust feedback cannot replace the moderators job.

Let's put an end to this case.

[suzanne5223]

I'll throw in my 2 satoshis too: OP is a bounty spammer, but that seems to be accepted on the bounty boards. Even if it wouldn't be accepted, it's something Mods should handle, and not something that DT should tag.
Posting on the wrong board can happen to anyone if you use enough open tabs. Not moving it by yourself is dumb/spam, but still not a reason to tag it. I've reported 100 times more posts than I've tagged, which is how spam should be handled.

Exactly. In this kind of situation the OP should be report or tell him to do the right correction not red trust cause that seems like placing ones above others.
It good the matter is solve though.

[Saint-loup]

I'll throw in my 2 satoshis too: OP is a bounty spammer, but that seems to be accepted on the bounty boards. Even if it wouldn't be accepted, it's something Mods should handle, and not something that DT should tag.
Posting on the wrong board can happen to anyone if you use enough open tabs. Not moving it by yourself is dumb/spam, but still not a reason to tag it. I've reported 100 times more posts than I've tagged, which is how spam should be handled.

Exactly. In this kind of situation the OP should be report or tell him to do the right correction not red trust cause that seems like placing ones above others.
It good the matter is solve though.

You should read more carefully the OP I think...

Why should I change my goals in order to satisfy this scoundrel's thirst
for power?
[...]
I see it as a violation of my personality.

[asche]

You should read more carefully the OP I think...

I guess good ol' suzanne was thinking to get a quick merit for that post.

[Thule]

I'll throw in my 2 satoshis too: OP is a bounty spammer, but that seems to be accepted on the bounty boards. Even if it wouldn't be accepted, it's something Mods should handle, and not something that DT should tag.
Posting on the wrong board can happen to anyone if you use enough open tabs. Not moving it by yourself is dumb/spam, but still not a reason to tag it. I've reported 100 times more posts than I've tagged, which is how spam should be handled.

Exactly. In this kind of situation the OP should be report or tell him to do the right correction not red trust cause that seems like placing ones above others.
It good the matter is solve though.

You should read more carefully the OP I think...

Why should I change my goals in order to satisfy this scoundrel's thirst
for power?
[...]
I see it as a violation of my personality.

Giving false accusations based on opinions ?
You think people from outside of bitcointalk are not talking about merit on other forums expecially in russia ?
If you start giving negative feedback even its shown as neutral its a clear abuse.
You have completly no evidence that this account is an alt.
In my opinion you should be removed as DT2 as you clearly have an ego issue to just remove the false tagging.

[asche]

If you start giving negative feedback even its shown as neutral its a clear abuse.

You should learn to read.

He wrote suspected, which it is.
Also he put some evidence of his logic in this very thread.

[Thule]

He has clearly an ego issue like many DT's .
He tagged op for shitposting .Not a single word about being a possible alt.
Now he had to remove that negative tagg and instantly found a new reason to add a neutral tagg as being a possible alt.
Reason ?OP talked to quickly about merit.

You know what it reminds me?Hitler time when people are not allowed to speak publicly about topics which level they don't represent or they will get marked.

Maybe we should start marking newbies who have knowledge about crypto or bounties ?
Its highly possible that these accounts are alts since how would a noob normly have any knowledge about crypto or that bounties exist at BCT ?
There is no world outside of BCT where they could get that kind of info.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

If you start giving negative feedback even its shown as neutral its a clear abuse.

This thread has gone on longer than it should have, and OP should lock it.

By the way, Thule--why don't you bitch to TECSHARE that he left me a horrible, unjust neutral feedback based on a disagreement we had?  Go ahead and check my trust page, it's there.