Buy Telegram members | Very High Quality bots at low prices!

[telegramstock]

Very high quality bots at low prices!

* Rookie:
500 Telegram members for 5$
* Average Joe:
1,000 Telegram members for 8$
* Business Mogul:
5,000 Telegram members for 35$
* Pro Telegramer:
10,000 Telegram members for 60$
* Any amount (>30k):
1 Telegram member for 0.01$

Order now at https://telegramstock.com/
If you want to test 50 members, write to me: @easymethod

[1714119350]

1714119350

[1714119350]

1714119350

[1714119350]

1714119350

[1714119350]

1714119350

[Slow death]

How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign  managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?

[greenlanternlight01]

How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign  managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?

Absolutely right. We don't need any more bots in our telegram channels

[telegramstock]

With the help of bots, you can slightly embellish the performance of the channel, it all depends on the owner’s good faith. The ideal ratio of 50% bots and 50% live. Not all owners have a budget to provide 100% of 20,000 subscribers in the channel, and we help such owners. I think it's good.

[r1a2y3m4]

With the help of bots, you can slightly embellish the performance of the channel

Can attract more investors on their group but you cannot answer the credibility of your group if the investors found out that you are using bot to attract users on your group.  :/

[telegramstock]

With the help of bots, you can slightly embellish the performance of the channel

Can attract more investors on their group but you cannot answer the credibility of your group if the investors found out that you are using bot to attract users on your group.  :/

It is reasonable to mix real users and bots. If you do everything correctly, no one will know.

[telegramstock]

I see another topic that they sell 1000 member Telegram, only 2$.

What is the point to buy bots for $ 2? They will unsubscribe the next day in a better case. And they look terrible, if you add them to the chat, it will be immediately clear that they are not real.

[julerz12]

How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign  managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?

Indeed. I once saw a newly built telegram group for a particular project and within a few hours, it already have around 10k members, most of which were bots and some are just random people being added to the group without their consent. What's worst is that whoever added those people/bots also had the audacity to even enroll those telegram usernames on the project's telegram bounty campaign. 
Organic growth is still the best way to create a strong and vibrant telegram community.

[telegramstock]

How You collect those membres, source.
I believe that You member will be real, but i need to know source.

These are bots, like living, real people.
We make them ourselves.

[1miau]

How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign  managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?

Indeed. I once saw a newly built telegram group for a particular project and within a few hours, it already have around 10k members, most of which were bots and some are just random people being added to the group without their consent. What's worst is that whoever added those people/bots also had the audacity to even enroll those telegram usernames on the project's telegram bounty campaign. 
Organic growth is still the best way to create a strong and vibrant telegram community.

Totally agree, it's a big no-go if I see that a project is using bought Telegram bots and if I'm checking the members in this group all members are fake, it's easy to spot. 

Better allocate a little part in the bounty to give people a reward when they join. And kick all bot/inactive accounts when it comes to final checking one or two weeks after the bounty is over. Disadvantage: the rewards are tiny for each participant and it can happen that there are so many transactions to be done, the transaction costs are far too high for the little amount of tokens for each participant.

To solve this problem of too much transaction costs a better solution is to create the Telegram bounty as invitation bounty where participants can invite their friends to the Telegram group. That would solve the problem that you don't have to send tiny amounts of tokens to thousands of users because the participants who are inviting their friends will get the reward. If each user invites 10 friends on average you'll save 9x transaction costs.

Like in every campaign it's also importand to weed out cheaters like if they are not inviting their friends but instead random people from other chats without their permission or if they add bots:
- When the final checking will be done (around one week after the bounty) to check if all participants are still in the group, kick everyone who has a last active time more than one week ago. (The invited friends have to enable last active time in the Telegram settings and that needs to be mentioned in the rules that they need to enable it. Users where the last active time is not enabled will count as not eligible).
- Kick every participant where more than 50% of his invited friends left the group or if they are not eligible (no last active time enabled or last active time more than 1 week ago) when you check final stakes.

That would save huge transaction costs and be a legit way to increase number of members in a Telegram group.

[telegramstock]

How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign  managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?

Indeed. I once saw a newly built telegram group for a particular project and within a few hours, it already have around 10k members, most of which were bots and some are just random people being added to the group without their consent. What's worst is that whoever added those people/bots also had the audacity to even enroll those telegram usernames on the project's telegram bounty campaign. 
Organic growth is still the best way to create a strong and vibrant telegram community.

Totally agree, it's a big no-go if I see that a project is using bought Telegram bots and if I'm checking the members in this group all members are fake, it's easy to spot. 

Better allocate a little part in the bounty to give people a reward when they join. And kick all bot/inactive accounts when it comes to final checking one or two weeks after the bounty is over. Disadvantage: the rewards are tiny for each participant and it can happen that there are so many transactions to be done, the transaction costs are far too high for the little amount of tokens for each participant.

To solve this problem of too much transaction costs a better solution is to create the Telegram bounty as invitation bounty where participants can invite their friends to the Telegram group. That would solve the problem that you don't have to send tiny amounts of tokens to thousands of users because the participants who are inviting their friends will get the reward. If each user invites 10 friends on average you'll save 9x transaction costs.

Like in every campaign it's also importand to weed out cheaters like if they are not inviting their friends but instead random people from other chats without their permission or if they add bots:
- When the final checking will be done (around one week after the bounty) to check if all participants are still in the group, kick everyone who has a last active time more than one week ago. (The invited friends have to enable last active time in the Telegram settings and that needs to be mentioned in the rules that they need to enable it. Users where the last active time is not enabled will count as not eligible).
- Kick every participant where more than 50% of his invited friends left the group or if they are not eligible (no last active time enabled or last active time more than 1 week ago) when you check final stakes.

That would save huge transaction costs and be a legit way to increase number of members in a Telegram group.

If you do everything correctly and use the methods in a complex, then you will never know that there are bots in the group.
Users who have come for a reward, as I think are worse than bots.

[1miau]

If you do everything correctly and use the methods in a complex, then you will never know that there are bots in the group.

Definitely not.
All I need to do is having a look at the members in that group, that's possible publicly in groups / supergroups and I can scroll a little bit back to see the members. If there is a significant number of bot accounts it's easily to detect them for experienced shitcoin analysts. If someone is not that dumb they won't be fooled.

Users who have come for a reward, as I think are worse than bots.

Why do you think that? If they receive their reward as promised there is not a single reason why invited people should be worse than fake bots. And in addition maybe some of these members are going to invest if it's not a scam shitcoin project. As a shitcoin artist () I woudn't think a second about inviting bots because it's not just useless, it's harmful for a project. Same as bumping services. If I see such shady marketing, my first impression is GTFO.

[telegramstock]

If you do everything correctly and use the methods in a complex, then you will never know that there are bots in the group.

Definitely not.
All I need to do is having a look at the members in that group, that's possible publicly in groups / supergroups and I can scroll a little bit back to see the members. If there is a significant number of bot accounts it's easily to detect them for experienced shitcoin analysts. If someone is not that dumb they won't be fooled.

Users who have come for a reward, as I think are worse than bots.

Why do you think that? If they receive their reward as promised there is not a single reason why invited people should be worse than fake bots. And in addition maybe some of these members are going to invest if it's not a scam shitcoin project. As a shitcoin artist () I woudn't think a second about inviting bots because it's not just useless, it's harmful for a project. Same as bumping services. If I see such shady marketing, my first impression is GTFO.

You cannot see it. On the contrary, shady marketing should consider the methods listed above. People who have come for money except for the constant outflow will not give anything to the project. They came exclusively for the money, so that after they were received, they would immediately exit.

[cooltoadfrommoon]

How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign  managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?

In that case, the bounty manager should investigate the telegram activity. I guess the bots of the telegram group are detectable.

[Ghild]

How could this be good? somebody goes into the bounty campaign and says he has 20,000 members, but those 20,000 members are bots bought, the project owners are happy that only one person is being able to announce their project to 20,000 people, that would be a good thing if those 20,000 people were real people. These bots are a big problem for bounty campaign  managers and owners of ICOs, I'm wrong?

People that do bounty for a living aren't foold and can simply check all those info

[telegramstock]

It's actual!

[Yettanasha]

What do you mean by saying 'high quality'? You mean they won't be banned?

[telegramstock]

What do you mean by saying 'high quality'? You mean they won't be banned?

low ban chance and high realism

[telegramstock]

thats actual!
high quality bots !

[jackricles54d51c]

Great Job! If you want to buy Telegram bots with cheap price or buy Telegram members try www.addtelegrammember.com website. i hope that will help you guys.